Parental perception of neonatal intensive care in public sector hospitals in South Africa

被引:0
|
作者
Ranchod, TM [1 ]
Ballot, DE
Martinez, AM
Cory, BJ
Davies, VA
Partridge, JC
机构
[1] Santa Clara Valley Med Ctr, Santa Clara, CA USA
[2] San Francisco Gen Hosp, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, Dept Paediat, ZA-2050 Wits, South Africa
[4] Johannesburg Gen Hosp, Johannesburg, South Africa
来源
SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2004年 / 94卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Little is known about parental experience and decision making with regard to premature infants requiring intensive care in developing countries. We undertook this study to characterise parents' experience of physician counselling and their role in making life-support decisions for very low-birth-weight (VLBW) (birth weight < 1501 g) infants born in South Africa's public-sector neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Methods. Parents of surviving VLBW infants treated in three Johannesburg-area public hospitals and attending follow-up clinics in August 2001 were interviewed regarding their experience of perinatal counselling on outcomes (pain, survival, disability), perception of actual and optimal decision making, and satisfaction with NICU communication. Results. Parents of 51 infants were interviewed. Seventy-five per cent of parents reported antenatal counselling by physicians on at least one perinatal topic (severe disability, pain, death, finances or religious/moral considerations). The majority of parents ( > 60%) who received counselling thought that these topics had been discussed adequately. Most parents reported that doctors had the primary decision-making role, either without consulting them (41%) or after consulting them (37%). joint decision making was rare (14%). Parents wanted more input in life-support decisions than they reported being given. Conclusion. Counselling is not consistently provided in public-sector hospitals in Johannesburg. Parents of premature infants want a larger share in NICU decision making than they currently experience. Most parents were satisfied with communication later during their infant's hospitalisation. South Africa presents a unique opportunity to study the use of advanced medical technologies in a nation with marked disparities in access to care.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 916
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Parental Understanding of Surgical Care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
    Wright, Robert C.
    Mueller, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 255 : 118 - 123
  • [22] Stakeholder influence in public sector information systems strategy implementation-The case of public hospitals in South Africa
    Hwabamungu, Boroto
    Brown, Irwin
    Williams, Quentin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 109 : 39 - 48
  • [23] The indirect costs of agency nurses in South Africa: a case study in two public sector hospitals
    Rispel, Laetitia C.
    Moorman, Julia
    GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2015, 8 : 67 - 75
  • [24] Parental perception of neonatal retro-transfers from level 3 to level 2 neonatal intensive care units
    Murthy, P.
    Dosani, A.
    Sikdar, K. C.
    Koleade, A.
    Rai, B.
    Scotland, J.
    Lodha, A.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 5546 - 5554
  • [27] Intensive care nursing in South Africa
    de Beer, J.
    Brysiewicz, P.
    Bhengu, B. R.
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 27 (01) : 6 - 10
  • [28] Measuring Parental Presence in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
    Powers, Shelby A.
    Taylor, Katherine
    Tumin, Dmitry
    Sr, John A. Kohler
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2022, 39 (02) : 134 - 143
  • [29] Infants in a neonatal intensive care unit: parental response
    Carter, JD
    Mulder, RT
    Bartram, AF
    Darlow, BA
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2005, 90 (02): : 109 - 113
  • [30] Neonatal intensive care and parental participation in decision making
    Cuttini, M
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2001, 84 (01): : F78 - F78