Single-stage versus two-stage reconstruction in chronic multi ligament knee injury

被引:1
|
作者
Khan, Mohammad Jesan [1 ]
Asif, Naiyer [1 ]
Sharma, Anubhav [1 ]
Siddiqui, Yasir Salam [1 ]
Khan, Abdul Qayyum [1 ]
机构
[1] AMU, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, JN Med Coll, Aligarh 202002, Uttar Pradesh, India
来源
关键词
Multi ligament knee injury; single-stage; two-stage; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ASSISTED COMBINED ANTERIOR; POSTEROLATERAL CORNER; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; MIDTERM OUTCOMES; MANAGEMENT; DISLOCATION; GRAFT; REPAIR; PCL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Multi ligament knee injury (MLKI) refers to the disruption of at least 2 of the 4 major knee ligaments. These injuries are managed in single and two-stage surgeries however, treatment guidelines for best practice are unsettled. There is no study in the literature that compares single and two-stage surgery for the management of chronic multiligament knee injury. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome between single-stage and two-stage surgical fixation in chronic multi-ligament knee injury. Methods: Twenty seven patients with chronic MLKI with at least 2 years of follow up were included. Fourteen patients underwent reconstruction of torn ligaments in a single-stage operation (Group I) and 13 patients underwent reconstruction of torn ligaments in two stages (Group II). Assessment of clinical outcome was done with IKDC knee score, TEGNER LYSHOLM knee score, range of movement and laxity tests (Anterior drawer test, Lachman, Posterior drawer test, pivot shift test, dial test, varus and valgus stress test). Results: At final follow up, there was no significant difference in post-operative IKDC knee scores in group I and group II (84.7 +/- 7.1 and 81.4 +/- 8.4 respectively, p=0.3) and Lysholm scores (85.8 +/- 8.3 and 80.9 +/- 8.3 respectively, p=0.1), range of movement (133.2 +/- 5.7 and 131.5 +/- 6.6 respectively, p=0.5) and all the patients regained full extension. At the final follow up 12/14 patients (85.7%) in group I and 11/13 patients (84.6%) in group II had a negative/grade 1 anterior drawer test (p=0.6), 14/14 (100%) in group I and 13/13 (100%) patients had negative/grade 1 lachman test (p=0.6), 13/14 patients (92.8%) in group I and 13/13 patients (100%) patients in group II had negative/grade 1 pivot shift test (p=0.4), 9/10 patients (90%) in group I and 12/13 patients (92.3%) in group II had negative/grade 1 posterior drawer (p=0.6), 6/6 patients (100%) in group I and 6/7 patients (85.7%) in group II had negative/grade 1 dial test (p=0.3), 5/6 patients (83.3%) in group I and 5/7 patients (71.4%) in group II had negative/grade 1 varus stress test (p=0.4), 6/7 patients (85.7%) in group I and 7/7 patients (100%) in group II had negative/grade 1 valgus stress test (p=0.1). Conclusion: Chronic MLKI managed by single stage and two stage reconstruction provides similar functional outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level III Retrospective Cohort Study.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 44
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcome of single-stage versus two-stage exchange for revision knee arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic infection
    Pangaud, Corentin
    Ollivier, Matthieu
    Argenson, Jean-Noel
    [J]. EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2019, 4 (08) : 495 - 502
  • [2] Single-stage versus two-stage bone flap reconstruction in chronic osteomyelitis: Multicenter outcomes comparison
    Piccato, Alice
    Crosio, Alessandro
    Antonini, Andrea
    Battiston, Bruno
    Titolo, Paolo
    Tos, Pierluigi
    Ciclamini, Davide
    [J]. MICROSURGERY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [3] BASK and research: Single-stage versus two-stage bilateral knee replacement, a randomised control trial
    Donell, Simon
    [J]. KNEE, 2006, 13 (04): : 259 - 259
  • [4] Outcomes of Two-Stage Interpolated Flaps Versus Single-Stage Techniques for Reconstruction of Intermediate Nasal Defects
    Kenerson, Michael C.
    Hughes, Jacob D.
    Sanchez, Anthony E.
    DePerrior, Sarah
    Rubinstein, Benjamin J.
    Dobratz, Eric J.
    [J]. FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY & AESTHETIC MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (05) : 383 - 388
  • [5] Single-stage versus two-stage arteriovenous loop microsurgical reconstruction: A meta-analysis of the literature
    Knackstedt, Rebecca
    Aliotta, Rachel
    Gatherwright, James
    Djohan, Risal
    Gastman, Brian
    Schwarz, Graham
    Hendrickson, Mark
    Gurunluoglu, Raffi
    [J]. MICROSURGERY, 2018, 38 (06) : 706 - 717
  • [6] Two-Stage Versus Single-Stage Inventory Models with or without Repair Ability
    Bakal, Ismail Serdar
    Ozpamukcu, Serkan
    Bayindir, Pelin
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH PROCEEDINGS 2012, 2014, : 555 - 560
  • [7] Two-stage versus single-stage repair for severe hypospadias with moderate chordee
    Hassan, Mohamed E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2014, 10 (04): : 125 - 129
  • [8] Single-stage versus two-stage surgery of pulmonary and hepatic hydatid cysts
    Kabiri, El Hassane
    El Hammoumi, Massine
    Bhairis, Mohamed
    [J]. KARDIOCHIRURGIA I TORAKOCHIRURGIA POLSKA-POLISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 18 (03) : 139 - 144
  • [9] CLINICAL OUTCOMES AFTER TWO-STAGE BICRUCIATE KNEE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
    Inada, Mauro Mituso
    Piedade, Sergio Rocha
    [J]. ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2021, 29 (01): : 7 - 11
  • [10] Two-stage ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation as treatment of knee dislocation
    Ma, Wenpu
    Yang, Yiqun
    Ha, Xin
    [J]. BMC SURGERY, 2023, 23 (01)