A methodological note on a weighted voting experiment

被引:8
|
作者
Guerci, Eric [1 ,2 ]
Hanaki, Nobuyuki [3 ,4 ]
Watanabe, Naoki [5 ]
Esposito, Gabriele [6 ]
Lu, Xiaoyan [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nice Sophia Antipolis, ISEM, F-06189 Nice, France
[2] CNRS, GREDEG, UMR 7321, F-06034 Nice, France
[3] Aix Marseille Univ, Aix Marseille Sch Econ, CNRS, EHESS, Marseille, France
[4] IUF, Marseille, France
[5] Univ Tsukuba, Fac Engn Informat & Syst, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058573, Japan
[6] Commiss European Communities, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Prospect Technol Studies, Seville, Spain
[7] Janssen Pharmaceut NV, Beerse, Belgium
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
POWER;
D O I
10.1007/s00355-014-0814-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We conducted a sensitivity analysis of the results of weighted voting experiments by varying two features of the experimental protocol by Montero et al. (Soc Choice Welf 30(1):69-87, 2008): (1) the way in which the roles of subjects are reassigned in each round [random role (RR) vs. fixed role (FR)] and (2) the number of proposals that subjects can simultaneously approve [multiple approval (MA) vs. single approval (SA)]. It was observed that the differences in these protocols had impacts on the relative frequencies of minimum winning coalitions (MWCs) as well as how negotiations proceed. 3-player MWCs were more frequently observed, negotiations were much longer, subjects made less mistakes, and proposal-objection dynamics were more frequently observed, under the protocol with FR and SA than under the protocol with RR and MA.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 850
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A methodological note on a weighted voting experiment
    Eric Guerci
    Nobuyuki Hanaki
    Naoki Watanabe
    Gabriele Esposito
    Xiaoyan Lu
    [J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 2014, 43 : 827 - 850
  • [2] A note on hierarchies in weighted voting games and partitions
    Friedman, Jane
    [J]. RAMANUJAN JOURNAL, 2016, 41 (1-3): : 305 - 310
  • [3] A note on hierarchies in weighted voting games and partitions
    Jane Friedman
    [J]. The Ramanujan Journal, 2016, 41 : 305 - 310
  • [4] A note on the complexity of manipulating weighted Schulze voting
    Mueller, Julian
    Kosub, Sven
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 2020, 162
  • [5] Meaningful learning in weighted voting games: an experiment
    Guerci, Eric
    Hanaki, Nobuyuki
    Watanabe, Naoki
    [J]. THEORY AND DECISION, 2017, 83 (01) : 131 - 153
  • [6] Meaningful learning in weighted voting games: an experiment
    Eric Guerci
    Nobuyuki Hanaki
    Naoki Watanabe
    [J]. Theory and Decision, 2017, 83 : 131 - 153
  • [7] RE-PREDICTING VOTING PATTERNS IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY - METHODOLOGICAL NOTE
    MOORE, DW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 1975, 19 (02) : 199 - 211
  • [8] Consistency in the time of experiment participation and personality correlates: a methodological note
    Zelenski, JM
    Rusting, CL
    Larsen, RJ
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2003, 34 (04) : 547 - 558
  • [9] Reconsidering Meaningful Learning in a Bandit Experiment on Weighted Voting: Subjects’ Search Behavior
    Naoki Watanabe
    [J]. The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 2022, 16 : 81 - 107
  • [10] Reconsidering Meaningful Learning in a Bandit Experiment on Weighted Voting: Subjects' Search Behavior
    Watanabe, Naoki
    [J]. REVIEW OF SOCIONETWORK STRATEGIES, 2022, 16 (01): : 81 - 107