Controlling seizures in children: diazepam or midazolam? Systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Doshi, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Manchester Childrens Hosp, Emergency Dept, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
关键词
Benzodiazepines; buccal administration; rectal administration; TREATING ACUTE SEIZURES; INTRANASAL MIDAZOLAM; RECTAL DIAZEPAM; INTRAVENOUS DIAZEPAM; BUCCAL MIDAZOLAM; INTRAMUSCULAR MIDAZOLAM; EPILEPTIC SEIZURES; PROLONGED SEIZURES; ABSORPTION; CHILDHOOD;
D O I
10.1177/102490791001700219
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Diazepam is commonly used to treat acute childhood seizures, but difficulty gaining intravenous access and variability of absorption after rectal administration can limit its efficacy. Midazolam is a water soluble benzodiazepine that has a rapid onset of action after intranasal or buccal administration and provides an alternative to diazepam in the control of acute childhood seizures. Methods: A literature search was performed to identify papers comparing the efficacy and tolerability of midazolam and diazepam in the management of childhood seizures. Results: Intranasal or buccal midazolam are at least as effective as rectal or intravenous diazepam in controlling acute childhood seizures. In all robust studies reporting a significant difference, time to gain seizure control was shorter in patients treated with midazolam than those treated with diazepam, predominantly due to shorter drug administration time. The incidence of seizure recurrence was lower in patients treated with midazolam than diazepam. Respiratory depression was uncommon in both groups. Conclusion: Intranasal or buccal midazolam provides a safe, effective and acceptable alternative to intravenous or rectal diazepam in the management of acute childhood seizures. (Hong Kong j.emerg.med. 2010; 17:196-204)
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 204
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of buccal Midazolam and rectal diazepam for the acute treatment of seizures
    Baysun, A
    Aydin, ÖF
    Atmaca, E
    Gürer, YKY
    [J]. CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2005, 44 (09) : 771 - 776
  • [22] Intranasal midazolam vs rectal diazepam in acute childhood seizures
    Bhattacharyya, Madhumita
    Kalra, Veena
    Gulati, Sheffali
    [J]. PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2006, 34 (05) : 355 - 359
  • [23] BUCCAL MIDAZOLAM OR RECTAL DIAZEPAM FOR ONGOING SEIZURES - WHAT IS BEST?
    Nakken, K. O.
    Lossius, M. I.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2011, 52 : 75 - 75
  • [24] Efficacy of buccal midazolam compared to intravenous diazepam in controlling convulsions in children: A randomized controlled trial
    Talukdar, Bibek
    Chakrabarty, Biswaroop
    [J]. BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 31 (10): : 744 - 749
  • [25] Comparison of buccal midazolam with rectal diazepam in the treatment of prolonged seizures in Ugandan children: A randomized clinical trial
    Mpimbaza, Arthur
    Ndeezi, Grace
    Staedke, Sarah
    Rosenthal, Philip J.
    Byarugaba, Justus
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2008, 121 (01) : E58 - E64
  • [27] Comparative study of intranasal midazolam and intravenous diazepam sedation for procedures and seizures
    Pankaj Mittal
    Ram Manohar
    A. K. Rawat
    [J]. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2006, 73 (11) : 975 - 978
  • [28] MIDAZOLAM IN THE TREATMENT OF EPILEPTIC SEIZURES IN CHILDREN
    LAHAT, E
    ESHEL, G
    KATZ, Y
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1990, 28 (03) : 468 - 469
  • [29] Safety and efficacy of buccal midazolam versus rectal diazepam for emergency treatment of seizures in children: a randomised controlled trial
    McIntyre, J
    Robertson, S
    Norris, E
    Appleton, R
    Whitehouse, WP
    Phillips, B
    Martland, T
    Berry, K
    Collier, J
    Smith, S
    Choonara, L
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 366 (9481): : 205 - 210
  • [30] RECTAL NARCOTIC INTRODUCTION IN SMALL CHILDREN WITH DIAZEPAM AND MIDAZOLAM
    KRETZ, FJ
    LIEGL, M
    HEINEMEYER, G
    [J]. ANAESTHESIST, 1984, 33 (09): : 454 - 454