Economic and environmental assessment of a multifunctional poplar plantation for roundwood and wood chip production in Spain

被引:3
|
作者
Laina, Ruben [1 ]
Herrero, Sara J. [2 ]
Corona, Blanca [3 ]
Tolosana, Eduardo [1 ]
Teresa de la Fuente, M. [1 ]
San Miguel, Guillermo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Ciudad Univ, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Minist Agr, Gran Via San Francisco 4-6, Madrid 28005, Spain
[3] Univ Utrech, Vening Meinesz Bldg A,Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Populus sp; life cycle assessment; operational cost; forest harvesting; profitability; environmental impacts; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SHORT-ROTATION COPPICE; BIOENERGY SYSTEMS; BIOMASS; ENERGY; IMPACTS; CHAINS; LCA;
D O I
10.5424/fs/2022311-18485
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Aim of study: To analyze the environmental and economic performance of a multifunctional poplar plantation (MPP), which was managed to produce timber for sawn wood and chips for bioenergy. Study area: The plantation was located in Southern Spain producing roundwood and woodchips (from tops and branches). Materials and methods: The life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was chosen to perform the environmental impact assessment from a cradle-to-gate perspective. Capital goods, including machinery-manufacturing processes, were included. One oven dry tonne (odt) of forest biomass was chosen as functional unit. The economic analysis was performed using present costs and common indicators: net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR). Main results: The harvest operations are the most environmental impacting subsystem and cultivation the costliest. Chipping was the process contributing the most to the environmental burden. The use of fertilizers, within the cultivation subsystem, had a notable impact on certain midpoint categories. In terms of climate change potential, 1 odt of delivered wood chips generated 64.1 kg CO2-eq. When considering the whole system (including the roundwood fraction), this value was 45.2 kg CO2-eq odt(-1). MPP was hardly profitable with land rental and irrigation being the most expensive items. NPV, including harvesting and transport subsystems, was 1,582 (sic) ha(-1), while IRR reached 6.3%. Research highlights: Our results allow to identify the costliest operations and those with the greatest impact to improve the system. Finally, these figures can be compared with other crop alternatives such us poplar short rotation coppice (SRC).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing the environmental impacts of furfural production in a poplar wood biorefinery: A study on the role of mannitol concentration and catalyst type
    Khounani, Zahra
    Razak, Normy Norfiza Abdul
    Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa
    Madadi, Meysam
    Sun, Fubao
    Fattah, Islam Md Rizwanul
    Karimi, Keikhosro
    Gupta, Vijai Kumar
    Aghbashlo, Mortaza
    Tabatabaei, Meisam
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2023, 203
  • [32] Selected environmental impacts of the technical production of wood chips from poplar short rotation coppice on marginal land
    Schweier, Janine
    Schnitzler, Joerg-Peter
    Becker, Gero
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2016, 85 : 235 - 242
  • [33] Economic and environmental assessment of different hydrogen production and transportation modes
    Sayer, Marlene
    Ajanovic, Amela
    Haas, Reinhard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 65 : 626 - 638
  • [34] ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF PLANTING COVER CROPS FOR ENERGY PRODUCTION
    Golkowska, K.
    Igos, E.
    Koster, D.
    Vervisch, B.
    Benetto, E.
    [J]. PAPERS OF THE 23RD EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2015, : 1372 - 1375
  • [35] Economic and Environmental Assessment of Redmud as Aggregate in Cement Clinker Production
    Hong, Jingmin
    Wang, Ling
    Hong, Jinglan
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2011, 90-93 : 3254 - +
  • [36] Assessment of Biocatalytic Production Parameters to Determine Economic and Environmental Viability
    Gunukula, Sampath
    Runge, Troy
    Anex, Robert
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2017, 5 (09): : 8119 - 8126
  • [37] An economic and environmental assessment of a glyphosate ban for the example of maize production
    Boecker, Thomas
    Britz, Wolfgang
    Moehring, Niklas
    Finger, Robert
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 47 (02) : 371 - 402
  • [38] An environmental and economic assessment from bioenergy production and biochar application
    Nie, Aiyun
    Kung, Shan-Shan
    Li, Hailing
    Zhang, Liguo
    He, Xiaogang
    Kung, Chih-Chun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SAUDI CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 25 (01)
  • [39] Economic and Environmental Assessment Using Emergy of Sheep Production in Brazil
    dos Reis, Beatriz Queiroz
    Rojas Moreno, Danny Alexander
    Nacimento, Rafael Araujo
    Luiz, Vitoria Toffolo
    Alves, Laya Kannan Silva
    Giannetti, Biagio Fernando
    Gameiro, Augusto Hauber
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [40] An environmental and economic assessment of topsoil production from dredge material
    Sheehan, C.
    Harrington, J.
    Murphy, J. D.
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2010, 55 (02) : 209 - 220