Assessment Practices in Adapted Physical Education

被引:0
|
作者
Bittner, Melissa [1 ]
Foster, Elizabeth [2 ]
Lavay, Barry [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Long Beach, Long Beach, CA 90840 USA
[2] Calif State Polytech Univ Pomona, Pomona, CA 91768 USA
关键词
Assessment; physical education; adapted physical education; motor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Determining current motor assessment practices used in adapted physical education (APE) settings is necessary to provide information about appropriate application for students with disabilities, including how it may affect student placement, and progression of motor skills. However, there is very little research to examine the most appropriate and widely used assessment instruments by APE teachers. The purpose of this study was to investigate motor assessments used and determinants for selecting assessments by APE teachers in the United States. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 146 APE teachers from across the United States who are currently assessing students with disabilities. The APE Assessment Questionnaire, designed to determine which assessment instruments are being used nationally by APE teachers, consisted of four sections: (a) participant demographics, (b) school demographics, (c) assessment questions, and (d) professional development. Mann Whitney U nonparametric statistics and frequency analysis was used to determine which assessment instruments are being used by APE teachers. Results indicated the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (50%), Adapted Physical Education Assessment Scale (42%), and Competency Testing for Adapted Physical Education (39%) were the most frequently used motor assessments nationally by APE teachers. It is necessary for APE teachers to be exposed to a variety and the most appropriate assessments for students with disabilities in physical education environments. Additional information gathered from the study provides current gaps within the assessment tools available to APE teachers.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 54
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ADAPTED GRADING in Physical Education for Students with Disabilities
    Roth, Kristi
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION RECREATION AND DANCE, 2020, 91 (05): : 43 - 50
  • [42] Adapted Physical Education teachers and teaching knowledge
    da Silva, Claudio Silverio
    de Souza Neto, Samuel
    Drigo, Alexandre Janotta
    MOTRIZ-REVISTA DE EDUCACAO FISICA, 2009, 15 (03): : 481 - 492
  • [43] Marketable features of the adapted physical education career in higher education
    Zhang, JB
    Joseph, D
    Horvat, M
    ADAPTED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUARTERLY, 1999, 16 (02) : 178 - 186
  • [44] Boccia as an adapted and sensitizing sport in Physical Education in Secondary Education
    Abellan, Jorge
    Maria Saez-Gallego, Nieves
    Carrion Olivares, Sebastian
    SPORT TK-REVISTA EUROAMERICANA DE CIENCIAS DEL DEPORTE, 2018, 7 (02): : 109 - 113
  • [45] Recruitment and initial socialization into adapted physical education teacher education
    Richards, K. Andrew R.
    Wilson, Wesley J.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2020, 26 (01) : 54 - 69
  • [46] Adapted Physical Education Advocacy and the Role of the NCPEID
    Piletic, Cindy K.
    Sullivan, Ann-Catherine
    Dillon, Suzanna Rocco
    PALAESTRA, 2020, 34 (04) : 50 - 58
  • [47] Adapted Physical Education National Standards is on Facebook
    不详
    PALAESTRA, 2012, 26 (01) : 8 - 8
  • [48] Health education assessment practices used by physical education and health teachers in a collaborative action research
    Bezeau, David
    Turcotte, S.
    Beaudoin, S.
    Grenier, J.
    PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT PEDAGOGY, 2020, 25 (04) : 379 - 393
  • [49] Making the case for democratic assessment practices within a critical pedagogy of physical education teacher education
    Lorente-Catalan, Eloisa
    Kirk, David
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2014, 20 (01) : 104 - 119
  • [50] Physical and meditative practices: Physical Education on the sidelines?
    de Oliveira, Rogerio Cruz
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2018, 34 (07):