Teaching Today in the Practice Setting of the Future: Implementing Innovations in Graduate Medical Education

被引:3
|
作者
Kim, Jung G. [1 ]
Morris, Carl G. [2 ,3 ]
Ford, Paul [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Grp Hlth Family Med Residency, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
FAMILY MEDICINE; PRIMARY-CARE; HOME;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000001510
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Problem Implementing an innovation, such as offering new types of patient-physician encounters through the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model while maintaining Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation standards (e.g., patient encounter minimums for trainees), is challenging. Approach In 2009, the Group Health Family Medicine Residency (GHFMR) received an ACGME Program Experimentation and Innovation Project (PEIP) exception that redefined the minimum Family Medicine Resident Review Committee requirement to 1,400 face-to-face visits and 250 electronic visits (1 electronic visit defined as 3 secure message or telephone encounters). The authors report GHFMR residents' continuity clinic encounters, specifically volume, from 2006 through 2013 via pre- and post-PCMH implementation. They discuss the implications for leaders of high-performing practices who desire to innovate while maintaining accreditation. Outcomes Post-PCMH residents had 20% more overall patient contact. The largest change in care delivery method included a large increase in secure messages between patients and residents. Pre-PCMH residents had more face-to-face encounters; however, post-PCMH residents had more contact for all types of patient care encounters (face-to-face, secure messaging, and telephone) per hour of clinic time. Next Steps The ACGME PEIP exception, allowing the incorporation of the PCMH, facilitated an increase in patient access and immersed residents in primary care innovation (namely, practicing in a PCMH model during graduate medical education training). The next steps are to assess the effect of the PCMH on resident learning and clinical outcomes and to continue residents' access to training that keeps pace with today's health care delivery needs.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 665
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] TOWARD A SANE AND BETTER FUTURE IN GRADUATE MEDICAL-EDUCATION
    BURG, FD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1987, 141 (04): : 405 - 406
  • [43] Sleep Medicine and Graduate Medical Education-Prospects for the Future
    Quan, Stuart F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE, 2009, 5 (06): : 497 - 497
  • [44] Preparing for the Future: Funding for Graduate Medical Education in Cardiothoracic Surgery
    DiMaio, John Michael
    Preventza, Ourania
    Strobel, Raymond
    Conklin, Jeremy
    Moffatt-Bruce, Susan D.
    Thompson, Jess L.
    Whyte, Richard I.
    Horvath, Keith A.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 112 (06): : 1736 - 1740
  • [46] Accrediting Graduate Medical Education in Psychiatry: Past, Present, and Future
    Toni Johnson
    Nadyah Janine John
    Michael Lang
    P. G. Shelton
    Psychiatric Quarterly, 2017, 88 : 235 - 247
  • [47] The Case for Interprofessional Learning and Collaborative Practice in Graduate Medical Education
    Brienza, Rebecca S.
    Zapatka, Susan
    Meyer, Emily M.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2014, 89 (11) : 1438 - 1439
  • [48] The future of medical education and teaching: A psychiatric perspective
    Okasha, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 154 (06): : 77 - 86
  • [49] Accounting for graduate medical education funding in family practice training
    Chen, FM
    Phillips, RL
    Schneeweiss, R
    Andrilla, CHA
    Hart, LG
    Fryer, GE
    Casey, S
    Rosenblatt, RA
    FAMILY MEDICINE, 2002, 34 (09) : 663 - 668
  • [50] Future of Osteopathic Medicine Depends on Investing in Graduate Medical Education
    Tosca, Mark
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 2006, 106 (06): : 319 - 319