Comparative Study between the CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) and CRISPR/Cas9 Systems for Multiplex Gene Editing in Maize

被引:13
|
作者
Gong, Chongzhi [1 ]
Huang, Shengchan [1 ]
Song, Rentao [2 ]
Qi, Weiwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Life Sci, Shanghai Key Lab Bioenergy Crops, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Agron & Biotechnol, Natl Maize Improvement Ctr,Joint Int Res Lab Crop, State Key Lab Plant Physiol & Biochem,Beijing Key, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
multiplex gene editing; Cpf1; CRISPR/Cas; maize genetics; editing efficiency; GENOME; CRISPR-CAS9; CPF1; ENDONUCLEASE; NUCLEASES; CLEAVAGE; BACTERIA; COMPLEX; RICE; RNAS;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture11050429
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Although the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system has been proved to be an efficient multiplex gene editing system in maize, it was still unclear how CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) system would perform for multiplex gene editing in maize. To this end, this study compared the CRISPR/Cpf1 system and CRISPR/Cas9 system for multiplex gene editing in maize. The bZIP transcription factor Opaque2 (O2) was used as the target gene in both systems. We found that in the T0 and T1 generations, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system showed lower editing efficiency than the CRISPR/Cas9 system. However, in the T2 generation, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system generated more types of new mutations. While the CRISPR/Cas9 system tended to edit within the on-target range, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system preferred to edit in between the targets. We also found that in the CRISPR/Cpf1 system, the editing efficiency positively correlated with the expression level of Cpf1. In conclusion, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system offers alternative choices for target-site selection for multiplex gene editing and has acceptable editing efficiency in maize and is a valuable alternative choice for gene editing in crops.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Single transcript unit CRISPR 2.0 systems for robust Cas9 and Cas12a mediated plant genome editing
    Tang, Xu
    Ren, Qiurong
    Yang, Lijia
    Bao, Yu
    Zhong, Zhaohui
    He, Yao
    Liu, Shishi
    Qi, Caiyan
    Liu, Binglin
    Wang, Yan
    Sretenovic, Simon
    Zhang, Yingxiao
    Zheng, Xuelian
    Zhang, Tao
    Qi, Yiping
    Zhang, Yong
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (07) : 1431 - 1445
  • [22] Tamoxifen- and Mifepristone-Inducible Versions of CRISPR Effectors, Cas9 and Cpf1
    Dominguez-Monedero, Alazne
    Davies, Jamie A.
    ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY, 2018, 7 (09): : 2160 - 2169
  • [23] CRISPR/Cas9 Essential Gene Editing in Drosophila
    Osadchiy, I. S.
    Kamalyan, S. O.
    Tumashova, K. Y.
    Georgiev, P. G.
    Maksimenko, O. G.
    ACTA NATURAE, 2023, 15 (02): : 70 - 74
  • [24] Optical Control of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing
    Hemphill, James
    Borchardt, Erin K.
    Brown, Kalyn
    Asokan, Aravind
    Deiters, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 137 (17) : 5642 - 5645
  • [25] Spatiotemporal control of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing
    Chenya Zhuo
    Jiabin Zhang
    Jung-Hwan Lee
    Ju Jiao
    Du Cheng
    Li Liu
    Hae-Won Kim
    Yu Tao
    Mingqiang Li
    Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 6
  • [26] GENE EDITING IN CHONDROCYTES USING CRISPR/CAS9
    Gibson, G.
    Yang, M.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2016, 24 : S2 - S3
  • [27] Spatiotemporal control of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing
    Zhuo, Chenya
    Zhang, Jiabin
    Lee, Jung-Hwan
    Jiao, Ju
    Cheng, Du
    Liu, Li
    Kim, Hae-Won
    Tao, Yu
    Li, Mingqiang
    SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND TARGETED THERAPY, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [28] An optimised CRISPR Cas9 and Cas12a mutagenesis toolkit for Barley and Wheat
    Lawrenson, Tom
    Clarke, Martha
    Kirby, Rachel
    Forner, Macarena
    Steuernagel, Burkhard
    Brown, James K. M.
    Harwood, Wendy
    PLANT METHODS, 2024, 20 (01)
  • [29] Insights into maize genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9
    Agarwal, Astha
    Yadava, Pranjal
    Kumar, Krishan
    Singh, Ishwar
    Kaul, Tanushri
    Pattanayak, Arunava
    Agrawal, Pawan Kumar
    PHYSIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF PLANTS, 2018, 24 (02) : 175 - 183
  • [30] Comparison of CCR5 knockout using Cas9 and Cpf1 CRISPR nucleases
    Omelchenko, D. O.
    Glazkova, D. V.
    Bogoslovskaya, E. V.
    Shipulin, G. A.
    HUMAN GENE THERAPY, 2017, 28 (12) : A58 - A59