Comparative Study between the CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) and CRISPR/Cas9 Systems for Multiplex Gene Editing in Maize

被引:13
|
作者
Gong, Chongzhi [1 ]
Huang, Shengchan [1 ]
Song, Rentao [2 ]
Qi, Weiwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Life Sci, Shanghai Key Lab Bioenergy Crops, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Agron & Biotechnol, Natl Maize Improvement Ctr,Joint Int Res Lab Crop, State Key Lab Plant Physiol & Biochem,Beijing Key, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
multiplex gene editing; Cpf1; CRISPR/Cas; maize genetics; editing efficiency; GENOME; CRISPR-CAS9; CPF1; ENDONUCLEASE; NUCLEASES; CLEAVAGE; BACTERIA; COMPLEX; RICE; RNAS;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture11050429
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Although the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system has been proved to be an efficient multiplex gene editing system in maize, it was still unclear how CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) system would perform for multiplex gene editing in maize. To this end, this study compared the CRISPR/Cpf1 system and CRISPR/Cas9 system for multiplex gene editing in maize. The bZIP transcription factor Opaque2 (O2) was used as the target gene in both systems. We found that in the T0 and T1 generations, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system showed lower editing efficiency than the CRISPR/Cas9 system. However, in the T2 generation, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system generated more types of new mutations. While the CRISPR/Cas9 system tended to edit within the on-target range, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system preferred to edit in between the targets. We also found that in the CRISPR/Cpf1 system, the editing efficiency positively correlated with the expression level of Cpf1. In conclusion, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system offers alternative choices for target-site selection for multiplex gene editing and has acceptable editing efficiency in maize and is a valuable alternative choice for gene editing in crops.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a for gene editing in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
    Ferenczi, Aron
    Fellbaum, Matthew
    Chew, Yen Peng
    Kidner, Catherine
    Molnar, Attila
    ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2024, 84
  • [2] Genome Editing of the Murine Calreticulin Gene Using the CRISPR/Cas9 and CPF1 System
    Watanabe, Daisuke
    Yasuda, Shunichiro
    Kawamata, Norihiko
    BLOOD, 2017, 130
  • [3] Efficient multiplex CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) genome editing system in Aspergillus aculeatus TBRC 277
    Abdulrachman, Dede
    Champreda, Verawat
    Eurwilaichitr, Lily
    Chantasingh, Duriya
    Pootanakit, Kusol
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 355 : 53 - 64
  • [4] The CRISPR Cas patent files, part 2: Is Cpf1/Cas12a a less conflict- prone alternative to Cas9?
    Storz, Ulrich
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 381 : 67 - 75
  • [5] Multiplex gene editing in rice with simplified CRISPR-Cpf1 and CRISPR-Cas9 systems
    Wang, Mugui
    Mao, Yanfei
    Lu, Yuming
    Wang, Zhidan
    Tao, Xiaoping
    Zhu, Jian-Kang
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY, 2018, 60 (08) : 626 - 631
  • [6] Multiplex gene editing in rice with simplified CRISPR-Cpf1 and CRISPR-Cas9 systems
    Mugui Wang
    Yanfei Mao
    Yuming Lu
    Zhidan Wang
    Xiaoping Tao
    Jian-Kang Zhu
    Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2018, 60 (08) : 626 - 631
  • [7] Cas9 versus Cas12a/Cpf1: Structure-function comparisons and implications for genome editing
    Swarts, Daan C.
    Jinek, Martin
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-RNA, 2018, 9 (05)
  • [8] Immunity to CRISPR Cas9 and Cas12a therapeutics
    Chew, Wei Leong
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-SYSTEMS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2018, 10 (01)
  • [9] Robust CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a)-mediated genome editing in allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)
    Li, Bo
    Rui, Hangping
    Li, Yajun
    Wang, Qiongqiong
    Alariqi, Muna
    Qin, Lei
    Sun, Lin
    Ding, Xiao
    Wang, Fuqiu
    Zou, Jiawei
    Wang, Yanqing
    Yuan, Daojun
    Zhang, Xianlong
    Jin, Shuangxia
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (10) : 1862 - 1864
  • [10] CRISPR/CAS9 GENE EDITING
    不详
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2015, : 26 - 27