Paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation versus general anaesthesia for women undergoing breast cancer surgery

被引:18
|
作者
Chhabra, Anjolie [1 ]
Chowdhury, Apala Roy [1 ]
Prabhakar, Hemanshu [2 ]
Subramaniam, Rajeshwari [1 ]
Arora, Mahesh Kumar [1 ]
Srivastava, Anurag [3 ]
Kalaivani, Mani [4 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol, Pain Med & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Neuroanaesthesiol & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Surg, New Delhi, India
[4] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Biostat, New Delhi, India
关键词
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; BLOCK; RECURRENCE; ANALGESIA; METAANALYSIS; SURVIVAL; EFFICACY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD012968.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among women. Surgical removal of the cancer is the mainstay of treatment; however, tumour handling during surgery can cause microscopic dissemination of tumour cells and disease recurrence. The body's hormonal response to surgery (stress response) and general anaesthesia may suppress immunity, promoting tumour dissemination. Paravertebral anaesthesia numbs the site of surgery, provides good analgesia, and blunts the stress response, minimising the need for general anaesthesia. Objectives To assess the eHects of paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation compared to general anaesthesia in women undergoing breast cancer surgery, with important outcomes of quality of recovery, postoperative pain at rest, and mortality. Search methods On 6 April 2020, we searched the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group (CBCG); CENTRAL (latest issue), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (via OvidSP); Embase (via OvidSP); the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) search portal; and ClinicalTrials.gov for all prospectively registered and ongoing trials. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in adult women undergoing breast cancer surgery in which paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation was compared to general anaesthesia. We did not include studies in which paravertebral anaesthesia was given as an adjunct to general anaesthesia and then this was compared to use of general anaesthesia. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently extracted details of trial methods and outcome data from eligible trials. When data could be pooled, analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis, and the random-eHects model was used if there was heterogeneity. When data could not be pooled, the synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) approach was applied. The GRADE approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. Main results Nine studies (614 participants) were included in the review. All were RCTs of parallel design, wherein female patients aged > 18 years underwent breast cancer surgery under paravertebral anaesthesia or general anaesthesia. None of the studies assessed quality of recovery in the first three postoperative days using a validated questionnaire; most assessed factors aHecting quality of recovery such as postoperative analgesic use, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), hospital stay, ambulation, and patient satisfaction. Paravertebral anaesthesia may reduce the 24-hour postoperative analgesic requirement (odds ratio (OR) 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.34; 5 studies, 305 participants; low-certainty evidence) compared to general anaesthesia. Heterogeneity (IM = 70%) was attributed to the fixed dose of opioids and non-steroidal analgesics administered postoperatively in one study (70 participants), masking a diHerence in analgesic requirements between groups. Paravertebral anaesthesia probably reduces the incidence of PONV (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.30; 6 studies, 324 participants; moderatecertainty evidence), probably results in a shorter hospital stay (mean diHerence (MD) -79.39 minutes, 95% CI -107.38 to -51.40; 3 studies, 174 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and probably reduces time to ambulation compared to general anaesthesia (SWiM analysis): percentages indicate vote counting based on direction of eHect (100%, 95% CI 51.01% to 100%; P = 0.125; 4 studies, 375 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Paravertebral anaesthesia probably results in higher patient satisfaction (MD 5.52 points, 95% CI 1.30 to 9.75; 3 studies, 129 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) on a 0 to 100 scale 24 hours postoperatively compared to general anaesthesia. Postoperative pain at rest and on movement was assessed at 2, 6, and 24 postoperative hours on a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale (VAS). Four studies (224 participants) found that paravertebral anaesthesia as compared to general anaesthesia probably reduced pain at 2 postoperative hours (MD -2.95, 95% CI -3.37 to -2.54; moderate-certainty evidence). Five studies (324 participants) found that paravertebral anaesthesia may reduce pain at rest at 6 hours postoperatively (MD -1.54, 95% CI -3.20 to 0.11; low-certainty evidence). Five studies (278 participants) found that paravertebral anaesthesia may reduce pain at rest at 24 hours postoperatively (MD -1.19, 95% CI -2.27 to -0.10; low-certainty evidence). DiHerences in the methods of two studies (119 participants) and addition of clonidine to the local anaesthetic in two studies (109 participants), respectively, contributed to the heterogeneity (IM = 96%) observed for these two outcomes. Two studies (130 participants) found that paravertebral anaesthesia may reduce pain on movement at 6 hours (MD-2.57, 95% CI -3.97 to -1.17) and at 24 hours (MD -2.12, 95% CI -4.80 to 0.55; low-certainty evidence). Heterogeneity (IM = 96%) was observed for both outcomes and could be due to methodological diHerences between studies. None of the studies reported mortality related to the anaesthetic technique. Eight studies (574 participants) evaluated adverse outcomes with paravertebral anaesthesia: epidural spread (0.7%), minor bleeding (1.4%), pleural puncture not associated with pneumothorax (0.3%), and Horner's syndrome (7.1%). These complications were self-limiting and resolved without treatment. No data are available on disease-free survival, chronic pain, and quality of life. Blinding of personnel or participants was not possible in any study, as a regional anaesthetic technique was compared to general anaesthesia. Risk of bias was judged to be serious, as seven studies had concerns of selection bias and three of detection bias. Authors' conclusions Moderate-certainty evidence shows that paravertebral anaesthesia probably reduces PONV, hospital stay, postoperative pain (at 2 hours), and time to ambulation and results in greater patient satisfaction on the first postoperative day compared to general anaesthesia. Paravertebral anaesthesia may also reduce postoperative analgesic use and postoperative pain at 6 and 24 hours at rest and on movement based on low-certainty evidence. However, RCTs using validated questionnaires are needed to confirm these results. Adverse events observed with paravertebral anaesthesia are rare.
引用
收藏
页数:58
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ultrasound guided surgery under Dilutional Local Anaesthesia and no sedation in breast cancer patients
    Nadeem, Muhammad
    Sahu, Ajay
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2020, 18 (02): : 91 - 94
  • [22] Postoperative complaints after spinal and thiopentone-isoflurane anaesthesia in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery - Spinal versus general anaesthesia
    Standl, T
    Eckert, S
    Esch, ISA
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 40 (02) : 222 - 226
  • [23] Quoted ERCP: sedation or general anaesthesia?
    Beeton, A.
    [J]. SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 17 (01) : 124 - 125
  • [24] Outcomes after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with general anaesthesia versus sedation
    Althoff, Friederike C.
    Agnihotri, Abhishek
    Grabitz, Stephanie D.
    Santer, Peter
    Nabel, Sarah
    Tran, Tuyet
    Berzin, Tyler M.
    Sundar, Eswar
    Xu, Xinling
    Sawhney, Mandeep S.
    Eikermann, Matthias
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 126 (01) : 191 - 200
  • [25] Comparison of local anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine sedation and general anaesthesia during septoplasty
    Dogan, Rafi
    Erbek, Selim
    Gonencer, Huseyin H.
    Erbek, H. Seyra
    Isbilen, Cengiz
    Arslan, Gulnaz
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (11) : 960 - 964
  • [26] Paravertebral block with propofol anaesthesia does not improve survival compared with sevoflurane anaesthesia for breast cancer surgery: independent discussion of a randomised controlled trial
    Cata, Juan P.
    Forget, Patrice
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 124 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [27] General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery
    Urwin, S
    Griffiths, R
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 85 (03) : 492 - 492
  • [28] Continuous paravertebral block for postoperative pain compared to general anaesthesia and wound infiltration for major oncological breast surgery
    Bouman, Esther A. C.
    Theunissen, Maurice
    Kessels, Alfons G. H.
    Keymeulen, Kristien B. M. I.
    Joosten, Elbert A. J.
    Marcus, Marco A. E.
    Buhre, Wolfgang F.
    Gramke, Hans-Fritz
    [J]. SPRINGERPLUS, 2014, 3
  • [29] Is topical anaesthesia and sedation with remifentanyl a substitute for retrobulbar anaesthesia in glaucoma surgery?
    Bocos, F. J.
    Salgado, I.
    Nadal, E.
    Agreda, G.
    Cabre, P.
    Raich, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 : 15 - 15
  • [30] Paravertebral anaesthesia for breast surgery - An initial experience at the university hospital of the West Indies
    Crawford-Sykes, AM
    Chin, DE
    Hambleton, IR
    [J]. WEST INDIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 53 (03): : 174 - 177