Dosage, deletions and dominance: Simple models of the evolution of gene expression

被引:25
|
作者
Hurst, LD [1 ]
Randerson, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Biol & Biochem, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jtbi.2000.2095
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Dominance of the wild-type allele over spontaneous null mutations, such as deletions, can be explained in terms of the effects of changes in enzyme dose on the flux of metabolic pathways. If ever increasing levels of enzyme activity have ever decreasing effects on the flux of the biochemical pathway, then halving of dosage will always have a lesser effect on flux than half the effect of complete removal of gene activity. Furthermore, if gene expression rates are high, then halving of dose can have a negligible effect on flux and dominance will be strong. Given that strong dominance appears to be common, this leaves open the issue of why enzyme activity levels are so high that a halving of expression rates is of minimal effect. Why produce so much surplus enzyme? One explanation, suggested by Haldane, is that selection favoured high expression levels as a defence against mutation. We model this scenario formally and show that protection from mutation is an extremely weak force determining expression levels. The selective coefficients are only of the order of the mutation rate. However, if we suppose a linear mapping of flux with fitness and a monotonic cost to increased gene expression, it follows simply that here exists an optimal level of gene expression. By contrast to the mutational model, doubling of gene expression rates when the system is distant from the optimum is associated with extremely high selective coefficients (orders of magnitude higher than the mutation rate). When the cost of gene expression is slight the optimal rate of expression is such that strong dominance will follow. (C) 2000 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 647
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EMPIRICAL AND STRUCTURAL MODELS FOR INSERTIONS AND DELETIONS IN THE DIVERGENT EVOLUTION OF PROTEINS
    BENNER, SA
    COHEN, MA
    GONNET, GH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1993, 229 (04) : 1065 - 1082
  • [32] Evaluating the Performance of Widely Used Phylogenetic Models for Gene Expression Evolution
    Dimayacyac, Jose Rafael
    Wu, Shanyun
    Jiang, Daohan
    Pennell, Matt
    [J]. GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 15 (12):
  • [33] Gene Expression Dosage Regulation in an Allopolyploid Fish
    Matos, I.
    Machado, M. P.
    Schartl, M.
    Coelho, M. M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03):
  • [34] GENE DOSAGE EFFECTS ON CATALASE EXPRESSION IN MAIZE
    TSAFTARIS, AS
    SCANDALIOS, JG
    MCMILLIN, DE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1981, 72 (01) : 11 - 14
  • [35] Evolutionary rate variation, genomic dominance and duplicate gene expression evolution during allotetraploid cotton speciation
    Flagel, Lex E.
    Wendel, Jonathan F.
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2010, 186 (01) : 184 - 193
  • [36] Efficient and simple generation of multiple unmarked gene deletions in Mycobacterium smegmatis
    Xu-Jian Mao
    Mei-Yi Yan
    Hui Zhu
    Xiao-Peng Guo
    Yi-Cheng Sun
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 6
  • [37] Efficient and simple generation of multiple unmarked gene deletions in Mycobacterium smegmatis
    Mao, Xu-Jian
    Yan, Mei-Yi
    Zhu, Hui
    Guo, Xiao-Peng
    Sun, Yi-Cheng
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [38] Gene dosage in the evolution and function of mammalian sex chromosomes
    Graves, JAM
    Disteche, CM
    Toder, R
    [J]. CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1998, 80 (1-4): : 94 - 103
  • [39] GENE DOSAGE COMPENSATION AND EVOLUTION OF SEX-CHROMOSOMES
    LUCCHESI, JC
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1978, 202 (4369) : 711 - 716
  • [40] CRITICALITY IN SIMPLE-MODELS OF EVOLUTION
    DEBOER, J
    JACKSON, AD
    WETTIG, T
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 1995, 51 (02): : 1059 - 1074