History of rainfed agriculture in Turkey

被引:0
|
作者
Aydin, M [1 ]
Kiliç, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Muskal Kemal Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Soil Sci, TR-31034 Antakya, Turkey
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Turkey, like most other Mediterranean countries, is an arid and semi-arid country. Turkey is also experiencing a population boom. This increase in population has led people to boost agricultural production by cultivating marginal land. In fact, until 1970, increases in food crop production were caused mostly by increases in the area of land that was cleared and cultivated. After 1970, with the help of more sophisticated techniques and more modern equipment, farmers aimed to conserve the moisture in the soil profile and produce greater yields by controlling the time of tilling, how many times a year soil was disturbed, and how deeply soil was cultivated. For a time; these new farming practices appeared to resolve Turkey's agricultural production problems. Between 1970 and 1990 while the area cultivated in wheat increased by only 9 % wheat production increased by 90 %. Nevertheless, Turkish farmers had much to learn about contending with periods of low rainfall, such as in 1989, when wheat production declined by 20 % from the year before. By the early 1990s, the increasing rate of production clearly showed that it was time to establish new guidelines for sustainable agriculture, particularly in the nation's dry regions. Indeed lack of rain during the growing season on the Central Plateau and other semiarid regions of Turkey poses the greatest challenge to the nation's agriculturalists. To address the pressing need for water the Turkish government launched the Southeastern Anatolian Development Project in 1987. The project covers an area of 74,000 km(2), roughly equal to one-tenth of Turkey's land surface. The project consists of 13 subprojects on the Euphrates and Tigris rivers.
引用
收藏
页码:1011 / 1015
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] No-tillage on corn production in rainfed agriculture in Northeast Brazil
    Silva, Antonio Sousa
    da Silva, Ivandro de Franca
    da Silva Neto, Luis de Franca
    de Souza, Cicero
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2011, 41 (09): : 1556 - 1562
  • [32] Microwatershed level water management for alleviating drought in rainfed agriculture
    Bhuiyan, SI
    OPERATIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1997, : 245 - 252
  • [33] Projected rainfall changes and their implications for rainfed agriculture in northern Ghana
    Klutse, Nana Ama Browne
    Owusu, Kwadwo
    Nkrumah, Francis
    Anang, Ohene Asa
    WEATHER, 2021, 76 (10) : 340 - 347
  • [34] The role of rainfed agriculture in securing food production in the Nile Basin
    Siderius, C.
    Van Walsum, P. E. V.
    Roest, C. W. J.
    Smit, A. A. M. F. R.
    Hellegers, P. J. G. J.
    Kabat, P.
    Van Ierland, E. C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 61 : 14 - 23
  • [35] IMPACT OF CLIMATE VARIABILITY ON RAINFED AGRICULTURE IN THE STATE OF TLAXCALA, MEXICO
    Bernal-Morales, Rogelio
    Angeles Velasco-Hernandez, Ma de los
    Morales-Acoltzi, Tomas
    Hernandez-Vazquez, Maricela
    Orozco-Flores, Saturnino
    Jimenez-Lopez, Jose
    AGRICULTURA SOCIEDAD Y DESARROLLO, 2020, 17 (04) : 713 - 733
  • [36] Managing water in rainfed agriculture-The need for a paradigm shift
    Rockstrom, Johan
    Karlberg, Louise
    Wani, Suhas P.
    Barron, Jennie
    Hatibu, Nuhu
    Oweis, Theib
    Bruggeman, Adriana
    Farahani, Jalali
    Qiang, Zhu
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 97 (04) : 543 - 550
  • [37] Dew trend analysis and its potential implications in rainfed agriculture
    Kumawat, Anita
    Singh, A. K.
    Singh, R. K.
    Kala, S.
    Rashmi, I
    JOURNAL OF AGROMETEOROLOGY, 2020, 22 (03): : 385 - 389
  • [38] Crop scheduling improvements for rainfed agriculture in the high jungle of Peru
    Meseth, Enrique
    Yu, Jason C. S.
    SCIENTIA AGROPECUARIA, 2014, 5 (04) : 187 - 197
  • [39] AGRICULTURE AND HISTORY
    Loehr, Rodney C.
    JOURNAL OF FARM ECONOMICS, 1948, 30 (03): : 537 - 544
  • [40] A History of Agriculture
    Falconer, J. I.
    JOURNAL OF FARM ECONOMICS, 1926, 8 (02): : 276 - 277