Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study

被引:811
|
作者
Pijls, Nico H. J. [1 ]
Fearon, William F. [2 ,3 ]
Tonino, Pim A. L.
Siebert, Uwe [4 ,5 ]
Ikeno, Fumiaki [2 ,3 ]
Bornschein, Bernhard [4 ]
van't Veer, Marcel
Klauss, Volker [6 ]
Manoharan, Ganesh [7 ]
Engstrom, Thomas [8 ]
Oldroyd, Keith G. [9 ]
Lee, Peter N. Ver [10 ,11 ]
MacCarthy, Philip A. [12 ]
De Bruyne, Bernard [13 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Dept Cardiol, NL-5623 EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Palo Alto VA Hlth Care Syst, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Hall In Tirol, Austria
[5] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Hosp, Med Poliklin, Munich, Germany
[7] Royal Victoria Hosp, Ctr Heart, Belfast BT12 6BA, Antrim, North Ireland
[8] Rigshosp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Golden Jubilee Natl Hosp, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[10] NE Cardiol Associates, Bangor, ME USA
[11] Eastern Maine Med Ctr, Bangor, ME USA
[12] Kings Coll Hosp London, London, England
[13] Cardiovasc Ctr Aalst, Aalst, Belgium
关键词
fractional flow reserve; multivessel coronary artery disease; drug-eluting stents; percutaneous coronary intervention; coronary pressure; pressure wire; OPTIMAL MEDICAL THERAPY; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; FUNCTIONAL SEVERITY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; PCI; STENOSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the 2-year outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Background In patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI, coronary angiography is the standard method for guiding stent placement. The FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study showed that routine FFR in addition to angiography improves outcomes of PCI at 1 year. It is unknown if these favorable results are maintained at 2 years of follow-up. Methods At 20 U.S. and European medical centers, 1,005 patients with multivessel CAD were randomly assigned to PCI with drug-eluting stents guided by angiography alone or guided by FFR measurements. Before randomization, lesions requiring PCI were identified based on their angiographic appearance. Patients randomized to angiography-guided PCI underwent stenting of all indicated lesions, whereas those randomized to FFR-guided PCI underwent stenting of indicated lesions only if the FFR was <= 0.80. Results The number of indicated lesions was 2.7 +/- 0.9 in the angiography-guided group and 2.8 +/- 1.0 in the FFR-guided group (p = 0.34). The number of stents used was 2.7 +/- 1.2 and 1.9 +/- 1.3, respectively (p < 0.001). The 2-year rates of mortality or myocardial infarction were 12.9% in the angiography-guided group and 8.4% in the FFR-guided group (p = 0.02). Rates of PCI or coronary artery bypass surgery were 12.7% and 10.6%, respectively (p = 0.30). Combined rates of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and revascularization were 22.4% and 17.9%, respectively (p = 0.08). For lesions deferred on the basis of FFR >0.80, the rate of myocardial infarction was 0.2 % and the rate of revascularization was 3.2 % after 2 years. Conclusions Routine measurement of FFR in patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents significantly reduces mortality and myocardial infarction at 2 years when compared with standard angiography-guided PCI. (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation [FAME]; NCT00267774) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 177-84) (C) 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 184
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding PCI in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Pijls, N.
    Fearon, W.
    [J]. HERZ, 2008, 33 (08) : 609 - 609
  • [2] A protocol update of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
    Zimmermann, Frederik M.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Desai, Manisha
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Reardon, Michael J.
    Wendler, Olaf
    Woo, Joseph
    Yeung, Alan C.
    Fearon, William F.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 214 : 156 - 157
  • [3] The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy
    Lim, Hong-Seok
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Yong, Andy S. C.
    Lee, Bong-Ki
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Fearon, William F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 177 (01) : 66 - 70
  • [4] Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
    Zimmermann, Frederik M.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Desai, Manisha
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Park, Seung-Jung
    Reardon, Michael J.
    Wendler, Olaf
    Woo, Joseph
    Yeung, Alan C.
    Fearon, William F.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 170 (04) : 619 - +
  • [5] Comment on: ⟪Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial ( Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)⟫
    Goncalves, Pedro de Araujo
    [J]. REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2017, 36 (12) : 967 - 969
  • [6] The Impact of Sex Differences on Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Substudy
    Kim, Hyun-Sook
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Yong, Andy S. C.
    Tremmel, Jennifer A.
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Fearon, William F.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 5 (10) : 1037 - 1042
  • [7] Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Siebert, Uwe
    Ikeno, Fumiaki
    van 't Veer, Marcel
    Klauss, Volker
    Manoharan, Ganesh
    Engstrom, Thomas
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Lee, Peter N. Ver
    MacCarthy, Philip A.
    Fearon, William F.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (03): : 213 - 224
  • [8] Angiographic Versus Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Stenoses in the FAME Study Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    Fearon, William F.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Leesar, Massoud A.
    Lee, Peter N. Ver
    MacCarthy, Philip A.
    van't Veer, Marcel
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (25) : 2816 - 2821
  • [9] Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Siebert, Uwe
    Ikeno, Fumiaki
    van 't Veer, Marcel
    Klauss, Volker
    Manoharan, Ganesh
    Engstrom, Thomas
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Verlee, Peter N.
    MacCarthy, Philip A.
    Fearon, William F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (10) : A6 - A6
  • [10] Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)
    Fearon, William F.
    Nishi, Takeshi
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Boothroyd, Derek B.
    Barbato, Emanuele
    Tonino, Pim
    Juni, Peter
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Hlatky, Mark A.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2018, 137 (05) : 480 - 487