共 50 条
- [2] A protocol update of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 214 : 156 - 157
- [4] Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 170 (04) : 619 - +
- [5] Comment on: ⟪Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial ( Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)⟫ [J]. REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2017, 36 (12) : 967 - 969
- [7] Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (03): : 213 - 224
- [10] Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) [J]. CIRCULATION, 2018, 137 (05) : 480 - 487