Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)

被引:201
|
作者
Fearon, William F. [1 ]
Nishi, Takeshi [1 ]
De Bruyne, Bernard [4 ]
Boothroyd, Derek B. [2 ]
Barbato, Emanuele [4 ,5 ]
Tonino, Pim [6 ]
Juni, Peter [7 ]
Pijls, Nico H. J. [6 ]
Hlatky, Mark A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Div Cardiovasc Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Quantitat Sci Unit, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] CA Cardiovasc Ctr Aalst, Stanford Cardiovasc Inst, Aalst, Belgium
[5] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, Naples, Italy
[6] Catharina Hosp, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[7] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Appl Hlth Res Ctr, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
angiography; coronary artery disease; fractional flow reserve; myocardial; percutaneous coronary intervention; stents; MEDICAL THERAPY; PCI;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031907
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Previous studies found that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does not improve outcome compared with medical therapy (MT) in patients with stable coronary artery disease, but PCI was guided by angiography alone. FAME 2 trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) compared PCI guided by fractional flow reserve with best MT in patients with stable coronary artery disease to assess clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Methods: A total of 888 patients with stable single-vessel or multivessel coronary artery disease with reduced fractional flow reserve were randomly assigned to PCI plus MT (n=447) or MT alone (n=441). Major adverse cardiac events included death, myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization. Costs were calculated on the basis of resource use and Medicare reimbursement rates. Changes in quality-adjusted life-years were assessed with utilities determined by the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions health survey at baseline and over follow-up. Results: Major adverse cardiac events at 3 years were significantly lower in the PCI group compared with the MT group (10.1% versus 22.0%; P<0.001), primarily as a result of a lower rate of urgent revascularization (4.3% versus 17.2%; P<0.001). Death and myocardial infarction were numerically lower in the PCI group (8.3% versus 10.4%; P=0.28). Angina was significantly less severe in the PCI group at all follow-up points to 3 years. Mean initial costs were higher in the PCI group ($9944 versus $4440; P<0.001) but by 3 years were similar between the 2 groups ($16792 versus $16737; P=0.94). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for PCI compared with MT was $17300 per quality-adjusted life-year at 2 years and $1600 per quality-adjusted life-year at 3 years. The above findings were robust in sensitivity analyses. ConclusionS: PCI of lesions with reduced fractional flow reserve improves long-term outcome and is economically attractive compared with MT alone in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01132495.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 487
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comment on: ⟪Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial ( Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)⟫
    Goncalves, Pedro de Araujo
    [J]. REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2017, 36 (12) : 967 - 969
  • [2] Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Fearon, William F.
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    Siebert, Uwe
    Ikeno, Fumiaki
    Bornschein, Bernhard
    van't Veer, Marcel
    Klauss, Volker
    Manoharan, Ganesh
    Engstrom, Thomas
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Lee, Peter N. Ver
    MacCarthy, Philip A.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 56 (03) : 177 - 184
  • [3] The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy
    Lim, Hong-Seok
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Yong, Andy S. C.
    Lee, Bong-Ki
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Fearon, William F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 177 (01) : 66 - 70
  • [4] Does Age Affect Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? A FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Trial Substudy
    Lim, Hong-Seok
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Fearon, William F.
    Lee, Bong-Ki
    Pijls, Nico
    Tonino, Pim A.
    Yong, Andy S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (18) : B25 - B25
  • [5] Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
    Zimmermann, Frederik M.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Desai, Manisha
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Park, Seung-Jung
    Reardon, Michael J.
    Wendler, Olaf
    Woo, Joseph
    Yeung, Alan C.
    Fearon, William F.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 170 (04) : 619 - +
  • [6] A protocol update of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
    Zimmermann, Frederik M.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Desai, Manisha
    Oldroyd, Keith G.
    Reardon, Michael J.
    Wendler, Olaf
    Woo, Joseph
    Yeung, Alan C.
    Fearon, William F.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 214 : 156 - 157
  • [7] The Impact of Sex Differences on Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Substudy
    Kim, Hyun-Sook
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Yong, Andy S. C.
    Tremmel, Jennifer A.
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Fearon, William F.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 5 (10) : 1037 - 1042
  • [8] Three-Year Outcomes With Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided or Angiography-Guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction
    Puymirat, Etienne
    Cayla, Guillaume
    Simon, Tabassome
    Steg, Philippe Gabriel
    Montalescot, Gilles
    Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
    Siaha, Fabiola Ngaleu
    Gallet, Romain
    Khalife, Khalife
    Morelle, Jean-Francois
    Motreff, Pascal
    Lemesle, Gilles
    Dillinger, Jean-Guillaume
    Lhermusier, Thibault
    Silvain, Johanne
    Roule, Vincent
    Labeque, Jean-Noel
    Range, Gregoire
    Ducrocq, Gregory
    Cottin, Yves
    Blanchard, Didier
    Nelson, Anais Charles
    Djadi-Prat, Juliette
    Chatellier, Gilles
    Danchin, Nicolas
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 17 (06)
  • [9] Cost utility of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel coronary artery disease in Brazil
    Stella, Steffan Frosi
    Polanczyk, Carisi Anne
    Arvandi, Marjan
    Siebert, Uwe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 31 (09) : 676 - 681
  • [10] Economic Evaluation of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Disease
    Fearon, William F.
    Bornschein, Bernhard
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    Gothe, Raffaella M.
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Pijls, Nico H. J.
    Siebert, Uwe
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (24) : 2545 - 2550