共 50 条
- [1] Comment on: ⟪Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial ( Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)⟫ [J]. REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2017, 36 (12) : 967 - 969
- [2] Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 56 (03) : 177 - 184
- [5] Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 170 (04) : 619 - +
- [6] A protocol update of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 214 : 156 - 157