Analyzing costs of space debris mitigation methods

被引:5
|
作者
Wiedemann, C
Krag, H
Bendisch, J
Sdunnus, H
机构
[1] TU Braunschweig, Aerosp Syst, D-38108 Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Aerodata AG, D-38108 Braunschweig, Germany
[3] Eta Max Space GmbH, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
来源
SPACE DEBRIS | 2004年 / 34卷 / 05期
关键词
debris mitigation measures; cost estimation;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2003.10.041
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The steadily increasing number of space objects poses a considerable hazard to all kinds of spacecraft. To reduce the risks to future space missions different debris mitigation measures and spacecraft protection techniques have been investigated during the last years. However, the economic efficiency has not been considered yet in this context. Current studies have the objective to evaluate the mission costs due to space debris in a business as usual (no mitigation) scenario compared to the missions costs considering debris mitigation. The aim is an estimation of the time until the investment in debris mitigation will lead to an effective reduction of mission costs. This paper presents the results of investigations on the key issues of cost estimation for spacecraft and the influence of debris mitigation and shielding on cost. Mitigation strategies like the reduction of orbital lifetime and de- or re-orbit of non-operational satellites are methods to control the space debris environment. These methods result in an increase of costs. In a first step the overall costs of different types of unmanned satellites are analyzed. A selected cost model is simplified and generalized for an application on all operational satellites. In a next step the influence of space debris on-cost is treated, if the implementation of mitigation strategies is considered. (C) 2004 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1241 / 1245
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Space debris mitigation measures applied to European launchers
    Bonnal, Christophe
    Gigou, Jacques
    Aubin, Didier
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2009, 65 (11-12) : 1679 - 1688
  • [42] Cost and benefit analysis of space debris mitigation measures
    Wiedemann, C
    Oswald, M
    Bendisch, J
    Sdunnus, H
    Vörsmann, P
    SPACE DEBRIS AND SPACE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM 2003, 2004, 109 : 429 - 448
  • [43] Consequences of space debris mitigation guidelines on geostationary transfer orbits
    Alby, F
    Deguine, B
    Bonnal, C
    Ratte, PM
    JBIS-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH INTERPLANETARY SOCIETY, 2006, 59 (01): : 3 - 10
  • [44] Space Debris Mitigation in France, Germany, Italy and United Kingdom
    Portelli, Claudio
    Alby, Fernand
    Crowther, Richard
    Wirt, Uwe
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2010, 45 (08) : 1035 - 1041
  • [45] Energetic cost and viability of the proposed space debris mitigation measures
    Rossi, A
    SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2001, VOL 108, PTS 1 AND 2, 2001, 108 : 283 - 303
  • [46] Recent Status and Future Prospect on Space Debris Mitigation Guideline
    Kim, Hae-Dong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2020, 48 (04) : 311 - 321
  • [47] Evaluation of space debris mitigation measures by Neutrosophic MULTIMOORA Method
    Yorukoglu, Mehmet
    Aydin, Serhat
    2019 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT ADVANCES IN SPACE TECHNOLOGIES (RAST), 2019, : 681 - 687
  • [48] SPACE DEBRIS SAFETY AND MITIGATION: SOME INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ASPECTS
    Abashidze, Aslan
    Solntsev, Alexander
    FIRST IAA/AAS SCITECH FORUM ON SPACE FLIGHT MECHANICS AND SPACE STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS, 2020, 170 : 929 - 937
  • [49] "Catcher's Mitt" as an Alternative to laser Space Debris Mitigation
    Phipps, Claude
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HIGH POWER LASER ABLATION 2010, 2010, 1278 : 509 - 514
  • [50] Energetic cost and viability of the proposed space debris mitigation measures
    Rossi, A
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2002, 39 (04) : 540 - 550