共 50 条
Cost-Effectiveness of Dual Bronchodilator Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium for COPD Treatment in China
被引:1
|作者:
Gong, Shiyi
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
Hu, Hao
[5
]
Zhao, Kun
[5
]
Yang, Ting
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
机构:
[1] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Pulm & Crit Care Med, 2 Yinghua East St, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Clin Res Ctr Resp Dis, 2 Yinghua East St, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Inst Resp Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, 2 Yinghua East St, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Natl Hlth Commiss Peoples Republ China, China Natl Hlth Dev Res Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源:
关键词:
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
COPD;
dual bronchodilator;
cost-effectiveness analysis;
China;
PULMONARY-DISEASE EXACERBATIONS;
SALMETEROL/FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
TIOTROPIUM;
SALMETEROL;
COMBINATION;
PREVENTION;
BURDEN;
QVA149;
D O I:
10.2147/COPD.S276476
中图分类号:
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) is a once-daily dual bronchodilator for long-term treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The efficacy and safety of IND/GLY have been proved before, but the cost-effectiveness is unknown in China. Purpose: This study assessed cost-effectiveness of IND/GLY comparing with salmeterol/ fluticasone (SAL/FLU) and tiotropium. Methods: A patient-level simulation model was established from Chinese payer perspective. Patient parameters were randomly simulated through resampling from parameter distributions based on clinical trials and China-specific cost data to represent individual level health state and health state transitions in the model. We simulated patient-level health state, costs, life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of whole life horizon to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of IND/GLY comparing with SAL/FLU and tiotropium respectively. Results: Comparing with SAL/FLU, IND/GLY resulted in 0.384 LYs and 0.255 QALYs gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is -35,822 CNY/LY and the incremental costutility ratio (ICUR) is -53,834 CNY/QALY for IND/GLY versus SAL/FLU. Comparing with tiotropium, IND/GLY resulted in 0.232 LYs and 0.146 QALYs gained. The ICER is 39,729 CNY/ LY and the ICUR is 63,246 CNY/QALY for IND/GLY versus tiotropium. Conclusion: This study found that dual bronchodilator IND/GLY is cost-effective for stable COPD treatment in China from Chinese payer's perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 441
页数:9
相关论文