Assessing the environmental sustainability of grass silage and cattle slurry for biogas production

被引:20
|
作者
Beausang, Ciara [1 ]
McDonnell, Kevin [1 ]
Murphy, Fionnuala [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Biosyst & Food Engn, Room 3-29, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Consequential life cycle assessment; Biomethane; Bioenergy; Agricultural feedstocks; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CO-DIGESTION; ENERGY; MANURE; CONSEQUENCES; PERFORMANCE; FUTURE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126838
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Grass silage and cattle slurry have been identified as potential significant resources for biogas produc-tion. While a higher proportion of grass silage enables a higher specific methane yield to be achieved, there are concerns that using high shares of grass silage may have negative environmental impacts. Previous studies which consider grass as a feedstock have focused on environmental sustainability in the context of greenhouse gas mitigation. However, there is a potential risk of burden shifting occurring if other environmental impacts, such as eutrophication and terrestrial acidification, are not taken into account. A consequential life cycle assessment was conducted to examine mono-digestion of cattle slurry and co-digestion with grass silage in different ratios on a volatile solids (VS) basis. The prior uses of the feedstocks were considered, along with the processes displaced by the biogas and digestate produced. The net environmental impact varied according to the proportion of silage and slurry digested. Higher environmental burdens were observed for mixes with a greater ratio of grass silage to slurry. The op-timum environmental performance for the baseline scenario was observed at a VS ratio of 0.4:0.6 for silage and slurry, where there is a net reduction for all impact categories considered. The choice of marginal technologies that are displaced has a significant influence on the results, as have the as-sumptions about how the grass silage is sourced. This study provides greater insight into the environ-mental impacts of co-digesting an energy crop with animal manure in varying proportions. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of different slurry application methods on grass silage quality
    Wyss, Ueli
    Latsch, Annett
    Nyfeler, Daniel
    AGRARFORSCHUNG SCHWEIZ, 2017, 8 (04): : 134 - 141
  • [32] Effects of slurry application method and timing on grass silage quality
    Laws, JA
    Smith, KA
    Jackson, DR
    Pain, BF
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2002, 139 : 371 - 384
  • [33] DIGESTION OF GRASS SILAGE AND DAIRY SLURRY AT BATCH AND CONTINUOUS SCALE
    Wall, D. M.
    O'Kiely, P.
    Murphy, J. D.
    PAPERS OF THE 22ND EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2014, : 493 - 497
  • [34] THE EFFECTS OF CATTLE AND PIG SLURRY FERTILIZERS ON EARTHWORMS (OLIGOCHAETA, LUMBRICIDAE) IN GRASSLAND MANAGED FOR SILAGE PRODUCTION
    COTTON, DCF
    CURRY, JP
    PEDOBIOLOGIA, 1980, 20 (03) : 181 - 188
  • [35] Comparison of nanoparticles effects on biogas and methane production from anaerobic digestion of cattle dung slurry
    Abdelsalam, E.
    Samer, M.
    Attia, Y. A.
    Abdel-Hadi, M. A.
    Hassan, H. E.
    Badr, Y.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 87 : 592 - 598
  • [36] Elephant grass clones for silage production
    Cipriano dos Santos, Rerisson Jose
    Lira, Mario de Andrade
    Guim, Adriana
    Ferreira dos Santos, Mercia Virgnia
    Batista Dubeux Junior, Jose Carlos
    de Leao de Mello, Alexandre Carneiro
    SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2013, 70 (01): : 6 - 11
  • [37] ENERGY RETENTION AND UTILIZATION OF GRASS AND LEGUME SILAGE BY CATTLE
    TYRRELL, HF
    THOMSON, DJ
    WALDO, DR
    GOERING, HK
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 1982, 41 (01) : A23 - A23
  • [38] VALUE OF DIFFERENT SUPPLEMENTS TO GRASS SILAGE FOR FATTENING CATTLE
    INNES, GM
    KAY, M
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1977, 24 (FEB): : 152 - 152
  • [39] Effect of additives on grass silage fermentation and effluent production, and on intake and liveweight change of young cattle
    Haigh, PM
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 1998, 69 (02): : 141 - 148
  • [40] Comparison of Environmental Performance Between Conventional and Organic Roughage Production: Grass and Silage Maize
    Masuda, Kiyotaka
    Yamamoto, Yasutaka
    AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2013, 37 (10) : 1120 - 1143