Dynamic range in the C. elegans brain network

被引:10
|
作者
Antonopoulos, Chris G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Dept Math Sci, Wivenhoe Pk, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
SMALL-WORLD; NEURONS; ORGANIZATION;
D O I
10.1063/1.4939837
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
We study external electrical perturbations and their responses in the brain dynamic network of the Caenorhabditis elegans soil worm, given by the connectome of its large somatic nervous system. Our analysis is inspired by a realistic experiment where one stimulates externally specific parts of the brain and studies the persistent neural activity triggered in other cortical regions. In this work, we perturb groups of neurons that form communities, identified by the walktrap community detection method, by trains of stereotypical electrical Poissonian impulses and study the propagation of neural activity to other communities by measuring the corresponding dynamic ranges and Steven law exponents. We show that when one perturbs specific communities, keeping the rest unperturbed, the external stimulations are able to propagate to some of them but not to all. There are also perturbations that do not trigger any response. We found that this depends on the initially perturbed community. Finally, we relate our findings for the former cases with low neural synchronization, self-criticality, and large information flow capacity, and interpret them as the ability of the brain network to respond to external perturbations when it works at criticality and its information flow capacity becomes maximal. (C) 2016 AIP Publishing LLC.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] C. Elegans Chromosomes Connect to Centrosomes by Anchoring into the Spindle Network
    Redemann, Stefanie
    Baumgart, Johannes
    Lindow, Norbert
    Shelley, Michael
    Nazockdast, Ehssan
    Kratz, Andrea
    Prohaska, Steffen
    Brugues, Jan
    Furthauer, Sebastian
    Mueller-Reichere, Thomas
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 114 (03) : 382A - 382A
  • [32] Remote response modes on the paced excitable C. elegans network
    Qian, Yu
    Chen, Zhili
    Yang, Runru
    Gao, Hongyan
    Lei, Zhao
    Zheng, Zhigang
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH, 2024, 6 (03):
  • [33] Robust Sigmoidal Control Response of C. elegans Neuronal Network
    Badhwar, Rahul
    Bagler, Ganesh
    ROUGH SETS, IJCRS 2017, PT II, 2017, 10314 : 393 - 402
  • [34] A Game-Theoretical Network Formation Model for C. elegans Neural Network
    Khajezade, Mohamad
    Goliaei, Sama
    Veisi, Hadi
    FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [35] STUDY ON CHEMOTAXIS BEHAVIORS OF C. ELEGANS USING DYNAMIC NEURAL NETWORK MODELS: FROM ARTIFICIAL TO BIOLOGICAL MODEL
    Xu, Jian-Xin
    Deng, Xin
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, 2010, 18 : 3 - 33
  • [36] Dynamic Encoding of Perception, Memory, and Movement in a C. elegans Chemotaxis Circuit
    Luo, Linjiao
    Wen, Quan
    Ren, Jing
    Hendricks, Michael
    Gershow, Marc
    Qin, Yuqi
    Greenwood, Joel
    Soucy, Edward R.
    Klein, Mason
    Smith-Parker, Heidi K.
    Calvo, Ana C.
    Colon-Ramos, Daniel A.
    Samuel, Aravinthan D. T.
    Zhang, Yun
    NEURON, 2014, 82 (05) : 1115 - 1128
  • [37] C. elegans detects toxicity of traumatic brain injury generated tau
    Zanier, Elisa R.
    Barzago, Maria Monica
    Vegliante, Gloria
    Romeo, Margherita
    Restelli, Elena
    Bertani, Ilaria
    Natale, Carmina
    Colnaghi, Luca
    Colombo, Laura
    Russo, Luca
    Micotti, Edoardo
    Fioriti, Luana
    Chiesa, Roberto
    Diomede, Luisa
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE, 2021, 153
  • [38] Computing Temporal Sequences Associated With Dynamic Patterns on the C. elegans Connectome
    George, Vivek Kurien
    Puppo, Francesca
    Silva, Gabriel A.
    FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [39] Colored Motifs Reveal Computational Building Blocks in the C. elegans Brain
    Qian, Jifeng
    Hintze, Arend
    Adami, Christoph
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (03):
  • [40] The whole worm: brain-body-environment models of C. elegans
    Lzquierdo, Eduardo J.
    Beer, Randall D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2016, 40 : 23 - 30