Outcomes after usage of a quality initiative program for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A comparison with on-pump surgery

被引:16
|
作者
Gobran, SR
Goldman, S
Ferdinand, F
Wertan, MA
Trace, C
Grunkemeier, GL
Wu, YX
Sutter, FP
机构
[1] Lankenau Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Main Line Hlth Syst, Wynnewood, PA USA
[2] Christina Care Hlth Serv, Dept Anesthesia, Wilmington, DE USA
[3] Providence Hlth Syst, Portland, OR USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2004年 / 78卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.05.084
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) may be associated with improved outcomes when compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass. This study evaluates the use of a system for access and stabilization (SAS) with a coronary stabilizer as well as a clinical effectiveness quality initiative (CEQI) process regarding outcomes. This included the development of an expanded heart care team as well as standardization and refinement of perioperative care at The Lankenau Hospital (ILH). Our aim was to evaluate morbidity and mortality of on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with OPCAB surgery using SAS in addition to a CEQI initiative. Methods. A retrospective consecutive cohort study using the Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) National Database was conducted. Three cohorts were analyzed: pre-SAS (December 1, 1999-August 31, 2000); use of SAS only (September 1, 2000-April 30, 2001), and the use of SAS + CEQI process (May 1, 2001-September 30, 2002). Morbidity and mortality for all on-pump CABG procedures performed over the time period of December 1, 1999-September 30, 2002 were compared with the SAS and SAS + CEQI groups only. Results. One-thousand two-hundred sixty-seven procedures were performed; 405 on-pump CABGs, 90 OPCABs pre-SAS, and 772 OPCABs with SAS, of which 552 were in the SAS + CEQI group. Statistically mortality was significantly lower in the SAS + CEQI vs the on-pump group (0.7% vs 3.0%, p < 0.01). The percentage of patients with prolonged ventilation was significantly lower statistically in the SAS + CEQI vs the on-pump group (4.2% vs 9.7%, p < 0.01). Statistically the length of stay was significantly lower in both SAS groups compared with the on-pump group (p < 0.01). Conclusions. OPCAB surgery using SAS in conjunction with a CEQI initiative improves outcomes for patients compared with on-pump CABG surgery. (C) 2004 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:2015 / 2021
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Postoperative stroke after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
    Biancari, Fausto
    Mosorin, Martti
    Rasinaho, Elsi
    Lahtinen, Jarmo
    Heikkinen, Jouni
    Niemela, Eija
    Anttila, Vesa
    Lepojarvi, Martti
    Juvonen, Tatu
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 133 (01): : 169 - 173
  • [22] Cardiac rehabilitation outcomes no different after on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
    Aron, Adrian
    Klinger, Troy A.
    McConnell, Timothy R.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOPULMONARY REHABILITATION AND PREVENTION, 2007, 27 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [23] Costs Five Years After Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
    Wagner, Todd H.
    Hattler, Brack
    Bakaeen, Faisal G.
    Collins, Joseph F.
    Almassi, G. Hossein
    Quin, Jacquelyn A.
    Grover, Frederick L.
    Bishawi, Muath
    Shroyer, A. Laurie W.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 107 (01): : 99 - 105
  • [24] Off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery
    Desai, ND
    Fremes, SE
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (17): : 1792 - 1792
  • [25] Endothelial Activation After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Comparison Between On-Pump and Off-Pump Techniques
    Vallely, Michael P.
    Bannon, Paul G.
    Bayfield, Matthew S.
    Hughes, Clifford F.
    Kritharides, Len
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2010, 19 (08): : 445 - 452
  • [26] Systemic inflammatory changes after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
    Shinde S.
    Kumar P.
    Neela P.
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006, 22 (1) : 10 - 14
  • [27] Comparison of intestinal ischemia after on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
    Soylu, Lutfi
    Aydin, Oguz Ugur
    Yildiz, Mehmet
    Serdaroglu, Hacer
    Kurtoglu, Murat
    Karademir, Sedat
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 49 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [28] Long-term outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery
    Nathoe, H. M.
    Van Dijk, D.
    Spoor, M.
    Hijman, R.
    Borst, C.
    Jansen, E. W. L.
    Doevendans, P. A. F. M.
    Grobbee, D. E.
    De Jaegere, P. P. T.
    Kalkman, C. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 : 354 - 354
  • [29] Benefit to quality of life after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery
    Immer, FF
    Berdat, PA
    Immer-Bansi, AS
    Eckstein, FS
    Müller, S
    Saner, H
    Carrel, TP
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 76 (01): : 27 - 31
  • [30] Pulmonary outcomes of off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in a randomized trial
    Staton, GA
    Williams, IH
    Mahoney, EA
    Hu, J
    Chu, HT
    Duke, PG
    Puskas, JD
    CHEST, 2005, 127 (03) : 892 - 901