Reinforcing the Staple Line During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Prospective Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Three Different Techniques

被引:151
|
作者
Dapri, Giovanni [1 ]
Cadiere, Guy Bernard [1 ]
Himpens, Jacques [1 ]
机构
[1] St Pierre Univ Hosp, European Sch Laparoscop Surg, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Sleeve gastrectomy; No staple line reinforcement; Buttressing staple line; Staple line suturing; Leak; Bleeding; Y GASTRIC BYPASS; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX; BARIATRIC SURGERY; DUODENAL SWITCH; MORBID-OBESITY; LEAKS; PRESSURE; FISTULAS; REDUCE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11695-009-0047-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Gastric leak and hemorrhage are the most important challenges after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). In order to reduce these complications, the staple line can be reinforced by absorbable sutures or by the use of glycolide trimethylene carbonate copolymer onto the linear stapler (Gore SeamguardA (R); W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, AZ). To our knowledge, there are no randomized studies showing the utility of staple line reinforcement during LSG. The purpose of this study was to randomly compare three techniques in LSG: no staple line reinforcement (group 1), buttressing of the staple line with Gore SeamguardA (R) (group 2), and staple line suturing (group 3). Between January 2008 and February 2009, 75 patients were prospectively and randomly enrolled in the three different techniques of handling the staple line during LSG. The patient groups were similar (NS). Mean operative time to perform the stomach sectioning was 15.9 +/- 5.9 min (group 1), 20.8 +/- 8.1 min (group 2), and 30.8 +/- 10.1 min (group 3) (p < 0.001). Mean total operative time was 47.4 +/- 10.7 min (group 1), 48.9 +/- 18.4 min (group 2), and 59.9 +/- 19.6 min (group 3) (p = 0.02). Mean blood loss during stomach sectioning was 19.5 +/- 21.3 mL (group 1), 3.6 +/- 4.7 mL (group 2), and 16.7 +/- 23.5 mL (group 3) (p < 0.001). Mean total blood loss was 48.9 +/- 67.1 mL (group 1), 32.5 +/- 46.5 mL (group 2), and 61.9 +/- 69.4 mL (group 3) (p = 0.03). Mean number of stapler cartridges used was 5.6 +/- 0.7 (group 1), 5.7 +/- 0.7 (group 2), and 5.8 +/- 0.6 (group 3) (NS). Postoperative leak affected one patient (group 1), two patients (group 2), and one patient (group 3) (NS). Mean hospital stay was 3.6 +/- 1.4 days (group 1), 3.9 +/- 1.5 days (group 2), and 2.8 +/- 0.8 days (group 3) (p = 0.01). In LSG, buttressing the staple line with Gore SeamguardA (R) statistically reduces blood loss during stomach sectioning as well as overall blood loss. No staple line reinforcement statistically decreases the time to perform stomach sectioning and the total operative time. No significant difference is evidenced in terms of postoperative leak between the three techniques of LSG.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 467
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prospective comparative study of the efficacy of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
    Konstantinos M. Stamou
    Evangelos Menenakos
    Dimitris Dardamanis
    Calliope Arabatzi
    Leonidas Alevizos
    Konstantinos Albanopoulos
    Emmanuel Leandros
    George Zografos
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 3526 - 3530
  • [22] Staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Does it affect clinical outcomes?
    Glaysher, Michael
    Khan, Omar A.
    Mabvuure, Nigel Tapiwa
    Wan, Andrew
    Reddy, Marcus
    Vasilikostas, Georgios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 11 (04) : 286 - 289
  • [23] The effect of oversewing the staple line in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: randomized control trial
    Kwiatkowski, Andrzej
    Janik, Michal R.
    Pasnik, Krzysztof
    Stanowski, Edward
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2016, 11 (03) : 149 - 155
  • [24] Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Absorbable Monofilament, Barbed Suture, Fibrin Glue, or Nothing? Results of a Prospective Randomized Study
    Carandina, S.
    Tabbara, M.
    Bossi, M.
    Valenti, A.
    Polliand, C.
    Genser, L.
    Barrat, Christophe
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 20 (02) : 361 - 366
  • [25] Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Absorbable Monofilament, Barbed Suture, Fibrin Glue, or Nothing? Results of a Prospective Randomized Study
    S. Carandina
    M. Tabbara
    M. Bossi
    A. Valenti
    C. Polliand
    L. Genser
    Christophe Barrat
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2016, 20 : 361 - 366
  • [26] STAPLE LINE REINFORCEMENT USING SEAMGUARD VERSUS OVERSEWING SUTURE DURING LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY FOR SUPERMORBID OBESE PATIENTS; a PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
    Elghadban, H.
    Negm, A.
    Samir, M.
    Besheer, M.
    Dawoud, I.
    Shoma, A.
    Abdallah, E.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 : 263 - 263
  • [27] Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes of Omentopexy and Clips along the Staple Line During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Study
    Muhammed Taha Demirpolat
    Mehmet Muzaffer Islam
    Mehmet Erman Bacaksiz
    Suleyman Caglar Ertekin
    Abdullah Sisik
    Obesity Surgery, 2024, 34 (11) : 4116 - 4124
  • [28] Outcome of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With and Without Staple Line Oversewing in Morbidly Obese Patients: A Randomized Study
    Aggarwal, Sandeep
    Sharma, Aditya Prakash
    Ramaswamy, Neelakandan
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (11): : 895 - 899
  • [29] Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study
    Tognoni, Valeria
    Benavoli, Domenico
    Bianciardi, Emanuela
    Perrone, Federico
    Ippoliti, Simona
    Gaspari, Achille
    Gentileschi, Paolo
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 2016
  • [30] STAPLE LINE MANAGEMENT DURING SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY. RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Sleeve gastrectomy
    Petrola Chacon, C.
    Vilallonga, R.
    Caubet, E.
    Gonzalez, O.
    Garcia, A.
    Balibrea, J.
    Blanco, R.
    Pera, M.
    Armengol, M.
    Fort, J.
    Ciuidin, A.
    Guerrero, M.
    Sanchez, M.
    Fidillo, E.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 : 324 - 324