Effects of perceptual learning on local stereopsis and neuronal responses of V1 and V2 in prism-reared monkeys

被引:17
|
作者
Nakatsuka, C.
Zhang, B.
Watanabe, I.
Zheng, J.
Bi, H.
Ganz, L.
Smith, E. L.
Harwerth, R. S.
Chino, Y. M.
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Coll Optometry, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[2] Kawasaki Med Sch, Dept Ophthalmol, Okayama, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1152/jn.01001.2006
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Visual performance improves with practice (perceptual learning). In this study, we sought to determine whether or not adult monkeys reared with early abnormal visual experience improve their stereoacuity by extensive psychophysical training and testing, and if so, whether alterations of neuronal responses in the primary visual cortex (V1) and/or visual area 2 (V2) are involved in such improvement. Strabismus was optically simulated in five macaque monkeys using a prism-rearing procedure between 4 and 14 wk of age. Around 2 yr of age, three of the prism-reared monkeys ("trained" monkeys) were tested for their spatial contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity. Two other prism-reared monkeys received no training or testing ("untrained" monkeys). Microelectrode experiments were conducted around 4 yr of age. All three prism-reared trained monkeys showed improvement in stereoacuity by a factor of 7 or better. However, final stereothresholds were still similar to 10-20 times worse than those in normal monkeys. In V1, disparity sensitivity was drastically reduced in both the trained and untrained prism-reared monkeys and behavioral training had no obvious effect. In V2, the disparity sensitivity in the trained monkeys was better by a factor of similar to 2.0 compared with that in the untrained monkeys. These data suggest that the observed improvement in stereoacuity of the trained prism-reared monkeys may have resulted from better retention of disparity sensitivity in V2 and/ or from "learning" by upstream neurons to more efficiently attend to residual local disparity information in V1 and V2.
引用
收藏
页码:2612 / 2626
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Postnatal development of onset transient responses in macaque V1 and V2 neurons
    Zhang, Bin
    Smith, Earl L., III
    Chino, Yuzo M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 100 (03) : 1476 - 1487
  • [32] Responses to Orientation Discontinuities in V1 and V2: Physiological Dissociations and Functional Implications
    Schmid, Anita M.
    Purpura, Keith P.
    Victor, Jonathan D.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 34 (10): : 3559 - 3578
  • [33] Cartesian and non-Cartesian responses in LGN, V1, and V2 cells
    Mahon, LE
    De Valois, RL
    VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 18 (06) : 973 - 981
  • [34] Perceptual learning: Is V1 up to the task?
    Thiele, A
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (16) : R671 - R673
  • [35] A VASOPRESSIN ANALOG THAT BINDS BUT DOES NOT ACTIVATE V1 OR V2 VASOPRESSIN RECEPTORS IS NOT INTERNALIZED INTO CELLS THAT EXPRESS V1 OR V2 RECEPTORS
    LUTZ, W
    LONDOWSKI, JM
    SANDERS, M
    SALISBURY, J
    KUMAR, R
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1992, 267 (02) : 1109 - 1115
  • [36] Development of temporal response properties and contrast sensitivity of V1 and V2 neurons in macaque monkeys
    Zheng, J.
    Zhang, B.
    Bi, H.
    Maruko, I.
    Watanabe, I.
    Nakatsuka, C.
    Smith, E. L.
    Chino, Y. M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 97 (06) : 3905 - 3916
  • [37] Discrimination of occlusions by end-stopped cells in areas V1 and V2 of alert monkeys
    Peterhans, E
    vanderZwan, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 48454 - 48454
  • [38] Directional bias of neurons in V1 and V2 of strabismic monkeys: Temporal-to-nasal asymmetry?
    Watanabe, I
    Bi, H
    Zhang, B
    Sakai, E
    Mori, T
    Harwerth, RS
    Smith, EL
    Chino, YM
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46 (10) : 3899 - 3905
  • [39] Neuronal responses from beyond the classic receptive field in V1 of alert monkeys
    Wu Li
    Peter Thier
    Christian Wehrhahn
    Experimental Brain Research, 2001, 139 : 359 - 371
  • [40] “V1着V1着……V2……”句式语法语义分析
    侯友兰
    徐阳春
    语言教学与研究, 2002, (05) : 36 - 40