Subpopulations, locations and fragmentation: applying IUCN red list criteria to herbarium specimen data

被引:66
|
作者
Rivers, Malin C. [1 ,2 ]
Bachman, Steven P. [1 ]
Meagher, Thomas R. [2 ]
Lughadha, Eimear Nic [1 ]
Brummitt, Neil A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Bot Gardens, Richmond TW9 3AB, Surrey, England
[2] Univ St Andrews, Sch Biol, Ctr Evolut Genes & Genom, St Andrews KY16 9TH, Fife, Scotland
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Extinction risk; Fragmentation; GIS; Herbarium specimens; IUCN red list; Leguminosae; Location; Madagascar; Subpopulation; EXTINCTION RISK; CONSERVATION; MADAGASCAR; PRIORITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10531-010-9826-9
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Despite the ecological and economic importance of plants, the majority of plant species and their conservation status are still poorly known. Based on the limited knowledge we have of many plant species, especially those in the tropics, the use of GIS techniques can give us estimates of the degree of population subdivision to be used in conservation assessments of extinction risk. This paper evaluates how best to use the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria to produce effective and consistent estimates of subpopulation structure based on specimen data available in the herbaria around the world. We assessed population structure through GIS-based analysis of the geographic distribution of collections, using herbarium specimen data for 11 species of Delonix sensu lato. We used four methods: grid adjacency, circular buffer, Rapoport's mean propinquity and alpha hull, to quantify population structure according to the terms used in the IUCN Red List: numbers of subpopulations and locations, and degree of fragmentation. Based on our findings, we recommend using the circular buffer method, as it is not dependent on collection density and allows points to be added, subtracted and/or moved without altering the buffer placement. The ideal radius of the buffer is debatable; however when dispersal characteristics of the species are unknown then a sliding scale, such as the 1/10th maximum inter-point distance, is the preferred choice, as it is species-specific and not sensitive to collection density. Such quantitative measures of population structure provide a rigorous means of applying IUCN criteria to a wide range of plant species that hitherto were inaccessible to IUCN classification.
引用
收藏
页码:2071 / 2085
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Applying IUCN red-listing criteria for assessing and reporting on the conservation status of fungal species
    Dahlberg, Anders
    Mueller, Gregory M.
    FUNGAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 4 (02) : 147 - 162
  • [32] Threatened primates experience high human densities: adding an index of threat to the IUCN Red List criteria
    Harcourt, AH
    Parks, SA
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 109 (01) : 137 - 149
  • [33] ESTABLISH IUCN RED LIST OF ECOSYSTEMS IN SOUTHWESTERN CHINA BASED ON REMOTE SENSING DATA
    Tan, Jianbo
    Li, Ainong
    Lei, Guangbin
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, : 1307 - 1310
  • [34] Marine Animals Protected by the IUCN Red Data List and CITES 1973 on Seagrass Ecosystems
    Pramudianto, Andreas
    Suharso, Putut
    Hidayati, Nurul
    1ST SRIWIJAYA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 2018 (1ST SRICOENV 2018), 2018, 68
  • [35] First Checklist of Stoneflies (Insecta: Plecoptera) of Bulgaria, with Application of the IUCN Red List Criteria at the National Level
    Tyufekchieva, Violeta
    Evtimova, Vesela
    Muranyi, David
    ACTA ZOOLOGICA BULGARICA, 2019, 71 (03): : 349 - 358
  • [36] Checklist of the Superfamilies Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of Bulgaria, with Application of the IUCN Red List Criteria at National Level
    Hristova, Hristina O.
    Beshkov, Stoyan Y.
    ACTA ZOOLOGICA BULGARICA, 2017, 69 (01): : 105 - 114
  • [37] Assessment of the Conservation Status of the Indian Ocean Humpback Dolphin (Sousa plumbea) Using the IUCN Red List Criteria
    Braulik, Gill T.
    Findlay, Ken
    Cerchio, Salvatore
    Baldwin, Robert
    HUMPBACK DOLPHINS (SOUSA SPP.): CURRENT STATUS AND CONSERVATION, PT 1, 2015, 72 : 119 - 141
  • [38] Sensitivity analyses of decision rules in World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List criteria using Australian plants
    Keith, DA
    Auld, TD
    Ooi, MKJ
    Mackenzie, BDE
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2000, 94 (03) : 311 - 319
  • [39] National assessment of threatened species using sparse data: IUCN Red List classification of Anatidae in Iran
    Nourani, E.
    Kaboli, M.
    Farhoodinia, M.
    Collen, B.
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 20 (01) : 42 - 50
  • [40] Testing the applicability of regional IUCN Red List criteria on ladybirds (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) in Flanders (north Belgium): opportunities for conservation
    Adriaens, Tim
    San Martin Y Gomez, Gilles
    Bogaert, Johan
    Crevecoeur, Luc
    Beuckx, Jean-Pierre
    Maes, Dirk
    INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY, 2015, 8 (05) : 404 - 417