Subpopulations, locations and fragmentation: applying IUCN red list criteria to herbarium specimen data

被引:66
|
作者
Rivers, Malin C. [1 ,2 ]
Bachman, Steven P. [1 ]
Meagher, Thomas R. [2 ]
Lughadha, Eimear Nic [1 ]
Brummitt, Neil A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Bot Gardens, Richmond TW9 3AB, Surrey, England
[2] Univ St Andrews, Sch Biol, Ctr Evolut Genes & Genom, St Andrews KY16 9TH, Fife, Scotland
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Extinction risk; Fragmentation; GIS; Herbarium specimens; IUCN red list; Leguminosae; Location; Madagascar; Subpopulation; EXTINCTION RISK; CONSERVATION; MADAGASCAR; PRIORITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10531-010-9826-9
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Despite the ecological and economic importance of plants, the majority of plant species and their conservation status are still poorly known. Based on the limited knowledge we have of many plant species, especially those in the tropics, the use of GIS techniques can give us estimates of the degree of population subdivision to be used in conservation assessments of extinction risk. This paper evaluates how best to use the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria to produce effective and consistent estimates of subpopulation structure based on specimen data available in the herbaria around the world. We assessed population structure through GIS-based analysis of the geographic distribution of collections, using herbarium specimen data for 11 species of Delonix sensu lato. We used four methods: grid adjacency, circular buffer, Rapoport's mean propinquity and alpha hull, to quantify population structure according to the terms used in the IUCN Red List: numbers of subpopulations and locations, and degree of fragmentation. Based on our findings, we recommend using the circular buffer method, as it is not dependent on collection density and allows points to be added, subtracted and/or moved without altering the buffer placement. The ideal radius of the buffer is debatable; however when dispersal characteristics of the species are unknown then a sliding scale, such as the 1/10th maximum inter-point distance, is the preferred choice, as it is species-specific and not sensitive to collection density. Such quantitative measures of population structure provide a rigorous means of applying IUCN criteria to a wide range of plant species that hitherto were inaccessible to IUCN classification.
引用
收藏
页码:2071 / 2085
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Subpopulations, locations and fragmentation: applying IUCN red list criteria to herbarium specimen data
    Malin C. Rivers
    Steven P. Bachman
    Thomas R. Meagher
    Eimear Nic Lughadha
    Neil A. Brummitt
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19 : 2071 - 2085
  • [2] Applying IUCN criteria to invertebrates: How red is the Red List of European butterflies?
    van Swaay, Chris
    Maes, Dirk
    Collins, Sue
    Munguira, Miguel L.
    Sasic, Martina
    Settele, Josef
    Verovnik, Rudi
    Warren, Martin
    Wiemers, Martin
    Wynhoff, Irma
    Cuttelod, Annabelle
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 144 (01) : 470 - 478
  • [3] Adapting the IUCN Red List criteria for invertebrates
    Cardoso, Pedro
    Borges, Paulo A. V.
    Triantis, Kostas A.
    Ferrandez, Miguel A.
    Martin, Jose L.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 144 (10) : 2432 - 2440
  • [4] Applying IUCN Red List criteria to birds at different geographical scales: similarities and differences
    Charra, M.
    Sarasa, M.
    ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2018, 41 (01) : 75 - 95
  • [5] Establishing IUCN Red List Criteria for Threatened Ecosystems
    Paul Rodriguez, Jon
    Rodriguez-Clark, Kathryn M.
    Baillie, Jonathan E. M.
    Ash, Neville
    Benson, John
    Boucher, Timothy
    Brown, Claire
    Burgess, Neil D.
    Collen, Ben
    Jennings, Michael
    Keith, David A.
    Nicholson, Emily
    Revenga, Carmen
    Reyers, Belinda
    Rouget, Mathieu
    Smith, Tammy
    Spalding, Mark
    Taber, Andrew
    Walpole, Matt
    Zager, Irene
    Zamin, Tara
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [6] The application of IUCN Red List criteria at regional levels
    Gärdenfors, U
    Hilton-Taylor, C
    Mace, GM
    Rodríguez, JP
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (05) : 1206 - 1212
  • [7] Conservation assessments, threats, and the IUCN Red List categories and criteria
    Proudlove, GS
    JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2004, 31 (07) : 1201 - 1202
  • [8] Using the IUCN Red List criteria to assess reintroduction success
    Seddon, P. J.
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 18 (05) : 407 - 408
  • [9] A practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria
    Paul Rodriguez, Jon
    Keith, David A.
    Rodriguez-Clark, Kathryn M.
    Murray, Nicholas J.
    Nicholson, Emily
    Regan, Tracey J.
    Miller, Rebecca M.
    Barrow, Edmund G.
    Bland, Lucie M.
    Boe, Kaia
    Brooks, Thomas M.
    Oliveira-Miranda, Maria A.
    Spalding, Mark
    Wit, Piet
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 370 (1662) : 1 - 9
  • [10] Implementation of IUCN criteria for the definition of the Red List of Ecosystems in Italy
    Capotorti, G.
    Zavattero, L.
    Copiz, R.
    Del Vico, E.
    Facioni, L.
    Bonacquisti, S.
    Frondoni, R.
    Allegrezza, M.
    Attorre, F.
    Bacchetta, G.
    Barni, E.
    Biondi, E.
    Brandmayr, P.
    Caccianiga, M. S.
    Carli, E.
    Casavecchia, S.
    Cerabolini, B. E. L.
    Chiarucci, A.
    Dell'Olmo, L.
    Fascetti, S.
    Fenu, G.
    Galdenzi, D.
    Gargano, D.
    Gianguzzi, L. A.
    Manes, F.
    Oddi, L.
    Orsenigo, S.
    Paolanti, M.
    Pinna, M. S.
    Rosati, L.
    Rossi, G.
    Sarandrea, P.
    Siniscalco, C.
    Spampinato, G.
    Tazzari, E. R.
    Tesei, G.
    Venanzoni, R.
    Viciani, D.
    Blasi, C.
    PLANT BIOSYSTEMS, 2020, 154 (06): : 1007 - 1011