Tumour characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer patients carrying the germline CHEK2*1100delC variant

被引:90
|
作者
de Bock, GH
Schutte, M
Krol-Warmerdam, EMM
Seynaeve, C
Blom, J
Brekelmans, CTM
Meijers-Heijboer, H
van Asperen, CJ
Cornelisse, CJ
Devilee, P
Tollenaar, RAEM
Klijn, JGM
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Decis Making, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[6] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[7] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Human Genet, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jmg.2004.019737
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: The germline CHEK2*1100delC variant has been associated with breast cancer in multiple case families where involvement of BRCA1 and BRCA2 has been excluded. Methods: We have investigated the tumour characteristics and prognosis of carriers of this germline variant by means of a prospective cohort study in an unselected cohort of 1084 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer. Data were collected for 34 patients with a germline CHEK2*1100delC mutation and for 102 patients without this mutation, stratified by age and date of diagnosis of the first primary breast cancer (within 1 year). Results: Carriers developed steroid receptor positive tumours (oestrogen receptor (ER): 91%; progesterone receptor (PR): 81%) more frequently than non-carriers (ER: 69%; PR: 53%; p = 0.04). Mutation carriers more frequently had a female first or second degree relative with breast cancer (p = 0.03), or had any first or second degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer (p = 0.04). Patients with the CHEK2 variant had a more unfavourable prognosis regarding the occurrence of contralateral breast cancer (relative risk (RR) = 5.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67 to 19.65), distant metastasis-free survival (RR = 2.81; 95% CI 1.20 to 6.58), and disease-free survival (RR = 3.86; 95% CI 1.91 to 7.78). As yet, no difference with respect to overall survival has been found at a median follow up of 3.8 years. Conclusion: We conclude that carrying the CHEK2*1100delC mutation is an adverse prognostic indicator for breast cancer. If independently confirmed by others, intensive surveillance, and possibly preventive measures, should be considered for newly diagnosed breast cancer cases carrying the CHEK2*1100delC variant.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 735
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CHEK2*1100delC homozygosity in the Netherlands—prevalence and risk of breast and lung cancer
    Petra EA Huijts
    Antoinette Hollestelle
    Brunilda Balliu
    Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat
    Caro M Meijers
    Jannet C Blom
    Bahar Ozturk
    Elly MM Krol-Warmerdam
    Juul Wijnen
    Els MJJ Berns
    John WM Martens
    Caroline Seynaeve
    Lambertus A Kiemeney
    Henricus F van der Heijden
    Rob AEM Tollenaar
    Peter Devilee
    Christi J van Asperen
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2014, 22 : 46 - 51
  • [32] CHEK2 1100delC is present in familial breast cancer cases of the Basque Country
    Martinez-Bouzas, Cristina
    Beristain, Elena
    Guerra, Isabel
    Gorostiaga, Javier
    Mendizabal, Jose-Luis
    De-Pablo, Jose-Luis
    Garcia-Alegria, Eva
    Sanz-Parra, Arantza
    Tejada, Maria-Isabel
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 103 (01) : 111 - 113
  • [33] Tumour subtype and age-specific breast cancer risk estimates for CHEK2*1100delC carriers
    Schmidt, M. K.
    Hogervorst, F.
    Cornelissen, S.
    Van der Kolk, L.
    Adank, M.
    Nevanlinna, H.
    Bojesen, S.
    Doerk, T.
    Easton, D. F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 57 : S36 - S37
  • [34] CHEK2*1100delC homozygosity is associated with a high breast cancer risk in women
    Adank, Muriel A.
    Jonker, Marianne A.
    Kluijt, Irma
    van Mil, Saskia E.
    Oldenburg, Rogier A.
    Mooi, Wolter J.
    Hogervorst, Frans B. L.
    van den Ouweland, Ans M. W.
    Gille, Johan J. P.
    Schmidt, Marjanka K.
    van der Vaart, Aad W.
    Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne
    Waisfisz, Quinten
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2011, 48 (12) : 860 - 863
  • [35] Increased CHEK2 1100delC genotype frequency (also) in unselected breast cancer patients.
    De Jong, MM
    Van der Graaf, WTA
    Nolte, IM
    Meerman, GJT
    Oosterwijk, JC
    Van der Steege, G
    Boezen, M
    Schaapveld, M
    Kleibeuker, JH
    De Vries, EGE
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 844S - 844S
  • [36] CHEK2* 1100delC screening of Asian women with a family history of breast cancer is unwarranted
    Lee, Ann S. G.
    Ang, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (14) : 2419 - 2419
  • [37] CHEK2*1100delC and risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia
    Sellick, Gabrielle S.
    Sullivan, Kate
    Catovsky, Daniel
    Houlston, Richard S.
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2006, 47 (12) : 2659 - 2660
  • [38] Sensitivity to systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer in CHEK2 1100delC mutation carriers
    Mieke Kriege
    Agnes Jager
    Antoinette Hollestelle
    Els M. J. J. Berns
    Jannet Blom
    Marion E. Meijer-van Gelder
    Anieta M. Sieuwerts
    Ans van den Ouweland
    J. Margriet Collée
    Judith R. Kroep
    John W. M. Martens
    Maartje J. Hooning
    Caroline Seynaeve
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2015, 141 : 1879 - 1887
  • [39] CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity predicts increased risk of breast cancer and poor outcome
    Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2007, 4 (4): : 212 - 213
  • [40] The CHEK2 1100delC mutation identifies families with a hereditary breast and colorectal cancer phenotype
    Meijers-Heijboer, H
    Wijnen, J
    Vasen, H
    Wasielewski, M
    Wagner, A
    Hollestelle, A
    Elstrodt, F
    van den Bos, R
    de Snoo, A
    Fat, GTA
    Brekelmans, C
    Jagmohan, S
    Franken, P
    Verkuijlen, P
    van den Ouweland, A
    Chapman, P
    Tops, C
    Möslein, G
    Burn, J
    Lynch, H
    Klijn, J
    Fodde, R
    Schutte, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) : 1308 - 1314