Modulation of human fibroblast gap junction intercellular communication by hyaluronan

被引:17
|
作者
Moyer, KE [1 ]
Ehrlich, HP [1 ]
机构
[1] Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Div Plast Surg, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/jcp.10288
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The composition of the extracellular matrix changes during dermal repair. Initially, hyaluronan (HA) concentration is high, however, by day 3, HA is eliminated. HA optimizes collagen organization within granulation tissue. One possible mechanism of HA modulation of collagen packing is through the promotion of gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC). Gap junctions are gated channels that allow rapid intercellular communication and synchronization of coupled cell activities. The gap junction channel is composed of connexin (Cx) proteins that form a gated channel between coupled cells. HA is reported to enhance Cx43 expression in transformed fibroblasts. GJIC was quantified by the scrape loading technique and reported as a coupling index. The coupling index for human dermal fibroblasts was 4.6 +/- 0.2, while the coupling index for fibroblasts treated with HA more than doubled to 10.6 +/- 0.7. By Western blot analysis no differences were appreciated in the protein levels of Cx43 or beta-catenin, a protein involved in the translocation of Cx to the cell surface. By immuno-histology Cx43 and beta-catenin were evenly distributed throughout the cell in controls, but in cells treated with HA these proteins were co-localized to the cell surface. Coupled fibroblasts are reported to enhance the organization of collagen fibrils. It is proposed that HA increases the accumulation of Cx43 and beta-catenin on the cell surface, leading to greater GJIC and enhanced collagen organization. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 170
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The modulation of gap-junctional intercellular communication by lipid rafts
    Defamie, Norah
    Mesnil, Marc
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES, 2012, 1818 (08): : 1866 - 1869
  • [32] Metabolites of benzene are potent inhibitors of gap-junction intercellular communication
    Edgar Rivedal
    Gisela Witz
    Archives of Toxicology, 2005, 79 : 303 - 311
  • [33] A MICROFLUIDIC CHIP FOR STUDYING INTERCELLULAR COMMUNICATION VIA GAP JUNCTION CHANNELS
    Bathany, Cedric
    Suchyna, Thomas
    Hua, Susan Z.
    NEMB2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME FIRST GLOBAL CONGRESS ON NANOENGINEERING FOR MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY - 2010, 2010, : 119 - 120
  • [34] Intercellular communication:: the Drosophila innexin multiprotein family of gap junction proteins
    Bauer, R
    Löer, B
    Ostrowski, K
    Martini, J
    Weimbs, A
    Lechner, H
    Hoch, M
    CHEMISTRY & BIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (05): : 515 - 526
  • [35] Using microfluidic approaches to study gap junction intercellular communication.
    Waxse, B.
    Hughes, A. J.
    Wojcik, M.
    Feliciano, D.
    van Engelenburg, S.
    Lippincott-Schwartz, J.
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2014, 25
  • [36] Gap junction intercellular communication propagates cell death in cancerous cells
    Krutovskikh, VA
    Piccoli, C
    Yamasaki, H
    ONCOGENE, 2002, 21 (13) : 1989 - 1999
  • [37] Gap junction intercellular communication propagates cell death signals in vitro
    Krutovskikh, VA
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 1999, 10 : 405A - 405A
  • [38] GAP JUNCTION MEDIATED INTERCELLULAR COMMUNICATION IS A FUNCTION OF CONTACTING CELL NUMBER
    WADE, MH
    SCHINDLER, M
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1988, 2 (04): : A320 - A320
  • [39] Gap Junction Intercellular Communication Mediates Ammonia-Induced Neurotoxicity
    Bobermin, Larissa Daniele
    Arus, Bernardo Assein
    Leite, Marina Concli
    Souza, Diogo Onofre
    Goncalves, Carlos-Alberto
    Quincozes-Santos, Andre
    NEUROTOXICITY RESEARCH, 2016, 29 (02) : 314 - 324
  • [40] Gap Junction Intercellular Communication Mediates Ammonia-Induced Neurotoxicity
    Larissa Daniele Bobermin
    Bernardo Assein Arús
    Marina Concli Leite
    Diogo Onofre Souza
    Carlos-Alberto Gonçalves
    André Quincozes-Santos
    Neurotoxicity Research, 2016, 29 : 314 - 324