Diagnostic Performance of Flat-Panel CT Arthrography for Cartilage Defect Detection in the Ankle Joint: Comparison With MDCT Arthrography With Gross Anatomy as the Reference Standard

被引:7
|
作者
Chemouni, David [1 ]
Champsaur, Pierre [1 ,2 ]
Guenoun, Daphne [1 ,2 ]
Desrousseaux, Julie [3 ]
Pauly, Vanessa [4 ]
Le Corroller, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hop St Marguerite, APHM, Dept Radiol, F-13009 Marseille, France
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM UMR 7287, Marseille, France
[3] Hop La Timone, APHM, Dept Radiotherapy, Marseille, France
[4] Hop St Marguerite, APHM, DIM, F-13009 Marseille, France
关键词
anatomy; ankle; arthrography; CT; flat-panel; MRI; MULTIDETECTOR-COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; MR-ARTHROGRAPHY; ARTICULAR-CARTILAGE; VOLUME CT; FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES; CADAVERS; KNEE; THICKNESS; LESIONS;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.13.12163
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance and radiation exposure of flat-panel CT arthrography for cartilage defect detection in the ankle joint to standard MDCT arthrography, using gross anatomy and thermoluminescent dosimetry as reference standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ten cadaveric ankle specimens were obtained from individuals who had willed their bodies to science. Five milliliters of a mixture of diluted ioxaglate and saline were injected. Specimens were examined consecutively with the use of flat-panel CT and MDCT. Radiation doses of flat-panel CT and MDCT were recorded using thermoluminescent dosimeters. Flat-panel CT and MDCT arthrography examinations were blinded and randomly evaluated by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus. In each ankle specimen, eight cartilage areas were assessed separately: medial talar surface, medial talar trochlea, lateral talar trochlea, lateral talar surface, tibial malleolus, medial tibial plafond, lateral tibial plafond, and fibular malleolus. Findings at flat-panel CT and MDCT arthrography were compared with macroscopic assessments in 80 cartilage areas. RESULTS. For the detection of cartilage lesions, flat-panel CT showed a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 98%, and accuracy of 94%, and MDCT arthrography showed a sensitivity of 55%, specificity of 98%, and accuracy of 88%. Flat-panel CT and MDCT arthrography showed almost perfect (kappa = 0.83) and substantial (kappa = 0.65) agreement, respectively, with anatomic examination. Radiation dose was significantly lower for flat-panel CT (mean, 2.1 mGy; range, 1.1-3.0 mGy) than for MDCT (mean, 47.2 mGy; range, 39.3-53.8 mGy) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION. Flat-panel CT arthrography is accurate for detecting cartilage defects in the ankle joint and is an alternative to MDCT arthrography that may have better diagnostic performance and may permit the use of a lower radiation dose.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1074
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Flat-panel CT arthrography for cartilage defect detection in the ankle joint: first results in vivo
    Pagliano, Sarah
    Chemouni, David
    Guggenberger, Roman
    Pauly, Vanessa
    Guenoun, Daphne
    Champsaur, Pierre
    Le Corroller, Thomas
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (08) : 1259 - 1265
  • [2] Flat-panel CT arthrography for cartilage defect detection in the ankle joint: first results in vivo
    Sarah Pagliano
    David Chemouni
    Roman Guggenberger
    Vanessa Pauly
    Daphné Guenoun
    Pierre Champsaur
    Thomas Le Corroller
    Skeletal Radiology, 2020, 49 : 1259 - 1265
  • [3] Correction to: Flat-panel CT arthrography for cartilage defect detection in the ankle joint: first results in vivo
    Sarah Pagliano
    David Chemouni
    Roman Guggenberger
    Vanessa Pauly
    Daphné Guenoun
    Pierre Champsaur
    Thomas Le Corroller
    Skeletal Radiology, 2020, 49 : 1267 - 1267
  • [4] Flat-Panel CT Arthrography Feasibility Study and Comparison to Multidetector CT Arthrography
    Guggenberger, Roman
    Fischer, Michael Alexander
    Hodler, Juerg
    Pfammatter, Thomas
    Andreisek, Gustav
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2012, 47 (05) : 312 - 318
  • [5] Cartilage lesions in the ankle joint: comparison of MR arthrography and CT arthrography
    Schmid, MR
    Pfirrmann, CWA
    Hodler, J
    Vienne, P
    Zanetti, M
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 32 (05) : 259 - 265
  • [6] Cartilage lesions in the ankle joint: comparison of MR arthrography and CT arthrography
    M. R. Schmid
    C. W. A. Pfirrmann
    J. Hodler
    P. Vienne
    M. Zanetti
    Skeletal Radiology, 2003, 32 : 259 - 265
  • [7] In Vitro High-Resolution Flat-Panel Computed Tomographic Arthrography for Artificial Cartilage Defect Detection Comparison With Multidetector Computed Tomography
    Guggenberger, Roman
    Winklhofer, Sebastian
    Spiczak, Jochen V.
    Andreisek, Gustav
    Alkadhi, Hatem
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (08) : 614 - 621
  • [8] C-arm flat-panel CT arthrography of the shoulder: Radiation dose considerations and preliminary data on diagnostic performance
    Roman Guggenberger
    Erika J. Ulbrich
    Tobias J. Dietrich
    Rosemarie Scholz
    Pascal Kaelin
    Christoph Köhler
    Thilo Elsässer
    Thomas Le Corroller
    Thomas Pfammatter
    Hatem Alkadhi
    Gustav Andreisek
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 454 - 463
  • [9] C-arm flat-panel CT arthrography of the shoulder: Radiation dose considerations and preliminary data on diagnostic performance
    Guggenberger, Roman
    Ulbrich, Erika J.
    Dietrich, Tobias J.
    Scholz, Rosemarie
    Kaelin, Pascal
    Koehler, Christoph
    Elsaesser, Thilo
    Le Corroller, Thomas
    Pfammatter, Thomas
    Alkadhi, Hatem
    Andreisek, Gustav
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (02) : 454 - 463
  • [10] High resolution flat-panel CT arthrography vs. MR arthrography of artificially created osteochondral defects in ex vivo upper ankle joints
    Poehler, Gesa H.
    Sonnow, Lena
    Ettinger, Sarah
    Rahn, Alexandra
    Klimes, Filip
    Becher, Christoph
    von Falck, Christian
    Wacker, Frank K.
    Plaass, Christian
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):