A systematic review of the costs and benefits of helicopter emergency medical services

被引:110
|
作者
Taylor, Colman B. [1 ]
Stevenson, Mark [1 ,2 ]
Jan, Stephen [1 ,2 ]
Middleton, Paul M. [4 ]
Fitzharris, Michael [5 ,6 ]
Myburgh, John A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] George Inst Int Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ New S Wales, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Ambulance Res Inst, Ambulance Serv NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Accid Res Ctr, Johannesburg, South Africa
[6] Monash Univ, Accid Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
Trauma; Injury; Critical care; Helicopter emergency medical services; Transport; Cost-effectiveness; TRAUMA PATIENTS; INJURED PATIENTS; TRANSPORT; MORTALITY; IMPACT; CARE; METAANALYSIS; TIMES; EMS; AIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2009.09.030
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) are popular in first world health systems despite inconsistent evidence in the scientific literature to support their use. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review of economic evaluations of HEMS, in order to determine the economic cost of HEMS and the associated patient-centered benefits. Method: A systematic review was performed of studies that provided a cost estimate of HEMS. The inclusion criteria consisted of English language articles that estimated both the costs and outcomes of a HEMS and fulfilled pre-specified criteria in relation to a cost analysis, cost-minimisation, cost effectiveness or cost-benefit evaluation. Identified studies were synthesised according to the patient diagnosis (trauma, non-trauma or non-specific) and the type of HEMS transport under review (primary scene retrieval or secondary inter-facility transport). All costs were converted to US dollars and indexed for inflation. Results: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Among all studies the annual cost of HEMS ranged from $115,777 to $5,571,578. Five studies showed HEMS to be a more expensive transport alternative without an associated benefit while eight studies provided cost-effectiveness ratios of $ 3292 and $ 2227 per life year saved for trauma, $ 3258 per life saved and $ 7138 and $ 12,022 per quality adjusted life year for non-trauma and $ 30,365 and $ 91,478 per beneficial mission for non-specific patient populations. One study also evaluated the cost of HEMS to societal benefit, producing a ratio of 1:6. Interpretation: The cost and effectiveness of HEMS varied considerably between studies. Despite generally being more expensive than ground transport, a number of studies found HEMS to be cost-effective. However, given the variation in the intervention design, context and study methods between studies it was not possible to assess the cost-effectiveness of HEMS in general. Given the variation inherent in the health systems in which HEMS operate, synthesis and extrapolation of study findings across differing health environments is difficult. To address economic and clinical evidence in relation to HEMS, future research that is tailored to account for local system factors is required. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 20
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Emergency Medical Services dispatcher recognition of stroke: A systematic review
    Wenstrup, Jonathan
    Hestoy, Bartal Hofgaard
    Sagar, Malini Vendela
    Blomberg, Stig Nikolaj Fasmer
    Christensen, Hanne
    Christensen, Helle Collatz
    Kruuse, Christina
    [J]. EUROPEAN STROKE JOURNAL, 2024, 9 (02) : 283 - 294
  • [32] Performance measurement in British Helicopter Emergency Medical Services and Australian Air Medical Services
    Simpson, Nicholas
    Bartley, Bruce
    Corfield, Alasdair R.
    Hearns, Stephen
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2012, 29 (03) : 243 - 246
  • [33] The impact of helicopter emergency medical service on acute ischemic stroke patients: A systematic review
    Tal, Shachar
    Mor, Saban
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 42 : 178 - 187
  • [34] Criteria for cancelling helicopter emergency medical Services (HEMS) dispatches
    Giannakopoulos, Georgios F.
    Bloemers, Frank W.
    Lubbers, Wouter D.
    Christiaans, Herman M. T.
    van Exter, Pieternel
    de Lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M.
    Zuidema, Wietse P.
    Goslings, J. Carel
    Bakker, Fred C.
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2012, 29 (07) : 582 - 586
  • [35] Front of neck airway in Finnish helicopter emergency medical services
    Ljungqvist, Harry
    Tommila, Miretta
    Setala, Piritta
    Raatiniemi, Lasse
    Pulkkinen, Ilkka
    Toivonen, Pamela
    Nurmi, Jouni
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2024, 55 (08):
  • [36] Aeromedical Transport in EMS (Including Helicopter Emergency Medical Services)
    Mardsen, Andrew
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2008, 23 : S80 - S80
  • [37] Willingness to Pay for Lives Saved by Helicopter Emergency Medical Services
    Ringburg, Akkie N.
    Buljac, Martina
    Stolk, Elly A.
    van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
    van Beeck, Ed F.
    Patka, Peter
    Schipper, Inger B.
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2009, 13 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [38] Mechanical chest compression: an alternative in helicopter emergency medical services?
    Holger Gässler
    Simone Kümmerle
    Marc-Michael Ventzke
    Lorenz Lampl
    Matthias Helm
    [J]. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2015, 10 : 715 - 720
  • [39] Mechanical chest compression: an alternative in helicopter emergency medical services?
    Gaessler, Holger
    Kuemmerle, Simone
    Ventzke, Marc-Michael
    Lampl, Lorenz
    Helm, Matthias
    [J]. INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 10 (06) : 715 - 720
  • [40] IS THE FLIGHT PHYSICIAN NEEDED IN HELICOPTER EMERGENCY MEDICAL-SERVICES
    RHEE, KJ
    BURNEY, RE
    MACKENZIE, JR
    STROZESKI, M
    LAGRECAREIBLING, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1984, 24 (07): : 680 - 680