Performance of the 2015 US Preventive Services Task Force Screening Criteria for Prediabetes and Undiagnosed Diabetes

被引:8
|
作者
O'Brien, Matthew J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bullard, Kai McKeever [4 ]
Zhang, Yan [4 ]
Gregg, Edward W. [4 ]
Carnethon, Mercedes R. [3 ]
Kandula, Namratha R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ackermann, Ronald T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Inst Publ Hlth & Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Ctr Community Hlth, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Diabet Translat, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
diabetes screening; prediabetes; undiagnosed diabetes; diabetes; dysglycemia; LIFE-STYLE INTERVENTION; IMPAIRED GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; FOLLOW-UP; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; ADULTS; RISK; CARE; COMPLICATIONS; THRESHOLDS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-018-4436-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In 2015, The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening for prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes (collectively called dysglycemia) among adults aged 40-70 years with overweight or obesity. The recommendation suggests that clinicians consider screening earlier in people who have other diabetes risk factors. To compare the performance of limited and expanded screening criteria recommended by the USPSTF for detecting dysglycemia among US adults. Cross-sectional analysis of survey and laboratory data collected from nationally representative samples of the civilian, noninstitutionalized US adult population. A total of 3643 adults without diagnosed diabetes who underwent measurement of hemoglobin A1c (A1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-h plasma glucose (2-h PG). Screening eligibility according to the limited criteria was based on age 40 to 70 years old and overweight/obesity. Screening eligibility according to the expanded criteria was determined by meeting the limited criteria or having ae<yen> 1 of the following risk factors: family history of diabetes, history of gestational diabetes or polycystic ovarian syndrome, and non-white race/ethnicity. Dysglycemia was defined by A1c ae<yen> 5.7%, FPG ae<yen> 100 mg/dL, and/or 2-h PG ae<yen> 140 mg/dL. Among the US adult population without diagnosed diabetes, 49.7% had dysglycemia. Screening based on the limited criteria demonstrated a sensitivity of 47.3% (95% CI, 44.7-50.0%) and specificity of 71.4% (95% CI, 67.3-75.2%). The expanded criteria yielded higher sensitivity [76.8% (95% CI, 73.5-79.8%)] and lower specificity [33.8% (95% CI, 30.1-37.7%)]. Point estimates for the sensitivity of the limited criteria were lower in all minority groups and significantly different for Asians compared to non-Hispanic whites [29.9% (95% CI, 23.4-37.2%) vs. 49.8% (95% CI, 45.9-53.7%); P < .001]. Diabetes screening that follows the limited USPSTF criteria will identify approximately half of US adults with dysglycemia. Screening other high-risk subgroups defined in the USPSTF recommendation would improve detection of dysglycemia and may reduce associated racial/ethnic disparities.
引用
收藏
页码:1100 / 1108
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The new US Preventive Services Task Force
    Berg, AO
    Allan, J
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2001, 64 (12) : 1945 - 1946
  • [42] Recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Dickey, L
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1997, 55 (02) : 426 - &
  • [43] JAMA and the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Fontanarosa, Phil B.
    Golub, Robert M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 326 (24): : 2477 - 2477
  • [44] An Appreciation of the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Brawley, Otis W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 54 (01) : 151 - 152
  • [45] Detecting type 2 diabetes and prediabetes among asymptomatic adults in the United States: modeling American Diabetes Association versus US Preventive Services Task Force diabetes screening guidelines
    Dall, Timothy M.
    Narayan, K. M. Venkat
    Gillespie, Karin B.
    Gallo, Paul D.
    Blanchard, Tericke D.
    Solcan, Mihaela
    O'Grady, Michael
    Quick, William W.
    POPULATION HEALTH METRICS, 2014, 12
  • [46] Detecting type 2 diabetes and prediabetes among asymptomatic adults in the United States: modeling American Diabetes Association versus US Preventive Services Task Force diabetes screening guidelines
    Timothy M Dall
    K M Venkat Narayan
    Karin B Gillespie
    Paul D Gallo
    Tericke D Blanchard
    Mihaela Solcan
    Michael O’Grady
    William W Quick
    Population Health Metrics, 12
  • [47] US Preventive Services Task Force HIV Screening Guidelines: A Laboratory Perspective
    Slev, Patricia R.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 59 (08) : 1281 - 1282
  • [48] Screening for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia: A Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Zakher, Bernadette
    Cantor, Amy G.
    Pappas, Miranda
    Daeges, Monica
    Nelson, Heidi D.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 161 (12) : 884 - U81
  • [49] Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
    Krist, Alex H.
    Davidson, Karina W.
    Mangione, Carol M.
    Barry, Michael J.
    Cabana, Michael
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Davis, Esa M.
    Donahue, Katrina E.
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    Kubik, Martha
    Landefeld, C. Seth
    Li, Li
    Ogedegbe, Gbenga
    Owens, Douglas K.
    Pbert, Lori
    Silverstein, Michael
    Stevermer, James
    Tseng, Chien-Wen
    Wong, John B.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 325 (10): : 962 - 970
  • [50] Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Kulasingam, Shalini L.
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Ghebre, Rahel
    Myers, Evan R.
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2013, 17 (02) : 193 - 202