Which type of pollutants need to be controlled with priority in wastewater treatment plants: Traditional or emerging pollutants?

被引:122
|
作者
Zhou, Yunqiao [1 ,2 ]
Meng, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Meng [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Shuqin [1 ]
He, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Li, Qifeng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Sheng [1 ]
Wang, Tieyu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PFASs; PPCPs; Heavy metals; Wastewater treatment plant; Emission flux; Risk ranking; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES PFASS; MULTIPLE-CLASS PHARMACEUTICALS; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE GENES; RISK-ASSESSMENT; POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES; DRINKING-WATER; ACIDS PFAAS; FLUOROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIAL; REMOVAL EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2019.104982
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Although wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) can purify wastewater, they also discharge numerous contaminants into the environment through effluent discharge and sludge disposal. The occurrence, emission flux, and risk assessment of traditional pollutants (e.g., heavy metals [HMs]), and emerging pollutants (e.g., perfluoroalkyl substances [PFASs] and pharmaceutical and personal care products [PPCPs]) in WWTP emissions are of important concern. The present study analyzed 17 PFASs, 25 PPCPs, and 8 HMs in influent, effluent, and excess sludge from six WWTPs along the Yanghe River, North China. Samples were collected during four sampling campaigns from November 2016 to July 2017. The mean concentrations of PFASs and PPCPs in influent were 46.4 ng L-1 and 6.57 mu g L--1,L- respectively; while those in effluent were 38.5 ng L-1 and 2.14 mu g L-1, respectively. The highest concentrations of HMs was detected of Zn in influent (2,866 mu g L-1) and effluent (3,960 mu g L-1). According to the concentration composition, short-chain PFASs, fluoroquinolones (FQs), and Zn were the predominant components in both influents and effluents. The mean PFAS and PPCP concentrations in excess sludge were 5.95 ng g(-1) and 3.74 mu g g(-1) dry weight (dw). Zn was the most abundant HMs in excess sludge with the concentration range of 156-14,271 mu g g(-1) dw. The compositions of PFASs, PPCPs and HMs differed between wastewater and excess sludge. The estimated emission flux of these pollutants was ordered as HMs > PPCPs> PFASs through effluent discharge and sludge disposal. Sludge disposal discharged more PPCPs and HMs into the environment than effluent discharge, which was contrary for PFASs. Relative risk of each pollutant is calculated by comparing the mean effluent concentration with the median effective concentration. Algae and fish were selected as recipient organisms to calculate the relative risk of 23 selected pollutants towards aquatic organisms. The highest-risk pollutant was Zn on both algae and fish, while perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) and atenolol (ATE) posed the lowest risk. In general, HMs (regarded as traditional pollutants) presented higher risks in effluent, followed by the emerging pollutants (PPCPs and PFASs). Therefore, control of traditional pollutants should be prioritized in WWTPs in this region. This study presents an overall assessment of the current status of traditional and emerging pollutants in WWTPs and provides useful information for upgrading wastewater treatment processes.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Priority pollutants and other micropollutants removal in an MBR-RO wastewater treatment system
    Plevri, A.
    Noutsopoulos, C.
    Mamais, D.
    Makropoulos, C.
    Andreadakis, A.
    Lytras, E.
    Samios, S.
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2018, 127 : 121 - 131
  • [32] Ranking potential impacts of priority and emerging pollutants in urban wastewater through life cycle impact assessment
    Munoz, Ivan
    Gomez, M. Jose
    Molina-Diaz, Antonio
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    Fernandez-Alba, Amadeo R.
    Garcia-Calvo, Eloy
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2008, 74 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [33] Evaluation of pollutants removal efficiency in wastewater treatment plants in the light of EU municipal wastewater treatment directive
    Bonislawska, Malgorzata
    Szmukala, Magdalena
    Krzesniak, Tomasz
    Szaniawska, Daniela
    [J]. VII National Polish Scientific Conference on Complex and Detailed Problems of Environmental Engineering, 2005, (22): : 323 - 344
  • [34] Identification and screening of priority pollutants in printing and dyeing industry wastewater and the importance of these pollutants in environmental management in China
    Ding, Shuai
    Li, Xue
    Qiao, Xiaocui
    Liu, Yan
    Wang, Haiyan
    Ma, Chunmeng
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 362
  • [35] Occurrence of emerging and priority pollutants in municipal reverse osmosis concentrates
    Wei, Xiaozhu
    Gu, Ping
    Zhang, Guanghui
    Huang, Jianjun
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2015, 17 (02) : 488 - 494
  • [36] Assessment of toxicity and biodegradability on activated sludge of priority and emerging pollutants
    Tobajas, Montserrat
    Verdugo, Veronica
    Polo, Alicia M.
    Rodriguez, Juan J.
    Mohedano, Angel F.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 37 (06) : 713 - 721
  • [37] Kinetic of oxidation and mineralization of priority and emerging pollutants by activated persulfate
    Rodriguez, Sergio
    Santos, Aurora
    Romero, Arturo
    Vicente, Fernando
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2012, 213 : 225 - 234
  • [38] Spatial distribution and comprehensive evaluation of emerging organic pollutants in effluents from wastewater treatment plants in northern cities of China
    Liu, Yuan
    Ji, Min
    Wang, Rumeng
    Zhai, Hongyan
    Yu, Shanshan
    Liu, Boyue
    Zhao, Yingxin
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2019, 156 : 20 - 31
  • [39] Wastewater treatment: Beyond pollutants removal
    Zhang Guangming
    [J]. RESEARCH JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 15 (04): : 3 - 4
  • [40] Emerging Pollutants - Part II: Treatment
    [J]. 1876, John Wiley and Sons Inc (88):