Therapeutic results in low-rectal cancer patients treated with abdominosacral resection are similar to those obtained by means of anterior resection in mid- and upper-rectal cancer cases

被引:23
|
作者
Bebenek, M. [1 ]
Pudelko, M. [1 ]
Cisarz, K. [1 ]
Balcerzak, A. [1 ]
Tupikowski, W. [1 ]
Wojciechowski, L. [1 ]
Stankowska, A. [1 ]
Tarkowski, R. [1 ]
Szulc, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Reg Comprehens Canc Ctr, PL-53413 Wroclaw, Poland
来源
EJSO | 2007年 / 33卷 / 03期
关键词
rectal cancer; abdominal resection; abdominosacral resection; survival; recurrence;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2006.09.012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: To present the experiences of the Regional Comprehensive Cancer Center in Wroclaw with abdominosacral resection (ASR) carried out in low-rectal cancer patients. Methods: Rectal cancer patients (n = 294) were operated on by the same surgical team using the standardized TME technique between May 5, 1998 and February 23, 2001. Depending on the distance from the anal verge, the primary tumor was removed by means of standard abdominal resection (AR-mid- and upper-rectal cancers) or abdominosacral resection (ASR-low-rectal cancers). The patients who underwent the different operative procedures were comparable in terms of distributions of age, gender, tumor infiltration depth and regional lymph node involvement with no significant statistical difference between the groups. Results: Ninety-seven cases were excluded from the analysis of survival based on exclusion criteria defined. Consequently, 197 cases were left for further analysis, including 154 patients operated on by AR and 43 who underwent ASR. AR and ASR patients did not differ significantly in terms of postoperative morbidity (11% and 14%, respectively), observed (57.1% vs. 60.4%) and relative 5-year survivals (74.3% vs. 73.2%) and the cumulative 5-year local recurrence rate (5.8% vs. 4.7%). Conclusion: The combined use of the modem TME technique and the "historical" abdominosacral excision of the rectum seems to give new, potentially attractive perspectives for successful surgical treatment of low-rectal cancers. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 323
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic Versus Open Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: Results from the National Cancer Data Base
    Nussbaum, Daniel P.
    Speicher, Paul J.
    Ganapathi, Asvin M.
    Englum, Brian R.
    Keenan, Jeffrey E.
    Mantyh, Christopher R.
    Migaly, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (01) : 124 - 132
  • [42] Comparison of three-year oncological results after restorative low anterior resection, non-restorative low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer
    Hol, Jeroen C.
    Burghgraef, Thijs A.
    Rutgers, Marieke L. W.
    Crolla, Rogier M. P. H.
    van Geloven, Nanette A. W.
    Leijtens, Jeroen W. A.
    Polat, Fatih
    Pronk, Apollo
    Smits, Anke B.
    Tuynman, Jurriaan B.
    Verdaasdonk, Emiel G. G.
    Consten, Esther C. J.
    Hompes, Roel
    Sietses, Colin
    [J]. EJSO, 2023, 49 (04): : 730 - 737
  • [43] High complication rate after low anterior resection for mid and high rectal cancer; results of a population-based study
    Bakker, I. S.
    Snijders, H. S.
    Wouters, M. W.
    Havenga, K.
    Tollenaar, R. A. E. M.
    Wiggers, T.
    Dekker, J. W. T.
    [J]. EJSO, 2014, 40 (06): : 692 - 698
  • [44] Assessment of the relation between the distal resection margin and incidence of local recurrence after low anterior resection in cases of low rectal cancer
    Mohamed, Mostafa A.
    Ouf, Tarek I.
    Ahmed, Tarek Y.
    Abdelmotal, Ahmed S. I.
    Khalil, Ahmed A.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 40 (04): : 1300 - 1309
  • [45] Pelvic dimensions on preoperative imaging can identify poor-quality resections after laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid- and low rectal cancer
    Johnny Chau
    Joshua Solomon
    A. Sender Liberman
    Patrick Charlebois
    Barry Stein
    Lawrence Lee
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 4609 - 4615
  • [46] Pelvic dimensions on preoperative imaging can identify poor-quality resections after laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid- and low rectal cancer
    Chau, Johnny
    Solomon, Joshua
    Liberman, A. Sender
    Charlebois, Patrick
    Stein, Barry
    Lee, Lawrence
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (10): : 4609 - 4615
  • [47] Ultra-low anterior resection with upper sphincter excision (USE) for low-lying rectal cancer
    Park, JG
    [J]. Proceedings of the 10th Congress of Asian Federation of Coloproctology: Controversies in Colorectal Surgery, 2005, : 5 - 10
  • [48] Long-term Quality of Life After Surgery for Mid- and High Rectal Cancer: Hartmann's Procedure Versus Anterior Resection and Abdominoperineal Resection
    Lindskold, Marcus
    Mariusdottir, Elin
    Wikstrom, Jens
    Lydrup, Marie-Louise
    Jorgen, Fredrik
    Buchwald, Pamela
    [J]. IN VIVO, 2024, 38 (04): : 1783 - 1789
  • [49] COLORECTAL ANASTOMOTIC BREAKDOWN 3 MONTHS AFTER LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION FOR AN UPPER RECTAL CANCER.
    White, L. R.
    Jose, A.
    Martinez, R.
    Pena, A. A.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (06) : E256 - E256
  • [50] A nomogram for predicting feasibility of laparoscopic anterior resection with trans-rectal specimen extraction (NOSES) in patients with upper rectal cancer
    Zhang, Zhen-Yu
    Zhu, Zhe
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    Ni, Li
    Lu, Bing
    [J]. BMC SURGERY, 2021, 21 (01)