Effect of fiber digestibility and conservation method on feed intake and the ruminal ecosystem of growing steers

被引:10
|
作者
Sousa, D. O. [1 ]
Mesquita, B. S. [2 ]
Diniz-Magalhaes, J. [1 ]
Bueno, I. C. S. [3 ]
Mesquita, L. G. [1 ]
Silva, L. F. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Vet Med, Dept Anim Sci, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Ouro Fino Saude Anim, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Anim Sci & Food Engn, Dept Anim Sci, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
cellulolytic bacteria; conservation method; fiber digestibility; intake; passage rate; sugarcane; NEUTRAL DETERGENT FIBER; DRY-MATTER INTAKE; INERT RUMEN BULK; DAIRY-COWS; DIETARY FIBER; CORN-SILAGE; FIBROBACTER-SUCCINOGENES; NITROGEN-UTILIZATION; VOLUNTARY INTAKE; GRASS MATURITY;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2014-8016
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Fiber digestibility is an important factor regulating DMI in ruminants. Additionally, the ensiling process can also affect digestibility and chemical composition of the forage. The objective of this study was to investigate effects of sugarcane NDF digestibility (NDFD) and conservation method on intake, rumen kinetics, and the ruminal ecosystem of steers. Eight ruminally cannulated Nellore steers (275 +/- 22 kg BW) were used in a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square design with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Two sugarcane genotypes divergent for stalk NDFD were used: IAC86-2480 with high NDFD and SP91-1049 with low NDFD. Experimental diets were formulated with 40% sugarcane, either freshly cut or as silage, and 60% concentrate on a DM basis. Each experimental period lasted for 14 d, with the last 4 d used for determination of intake, ruminal evacuation, and ruminal fluid collection. The effect of fiber digestibility on DM and NDF intake was dependent on the forage conservation method (P = 0.01). High NDFD increased (P < 0.01) DMI only when sugarcane was offered as silage, having no effect (P = 0.41) on DMI when offered as freshly cut. Conservation method had no effect on total ruminal mass, with only a tendency (P < 0.10) for greater NDF and indigestible NDF ruminal mass in steers fed the low-NDFD genotype. The NDF turnover and passage rates were greater (P < 0.05) for the genotype with high NDFD but only when offered as silage. Liquid turnover rate in the rumen was greater (P = 0.02) for diets containing silage, with no effect of genotype (P = 0.87). There was no effect of NDFD genotype on ruminal pH (P = 0.77); however, diets containing sugarcane as silage increased (P < 0.01) ruminal pH. Total concentration of short chain fatty acids (P = 0.05) and proportions of propionate (P = 0.01) were greater for diets containing fresh sugarcane. Diets with fresh sugarcane increased the ruminal population of Streptococcus bovis (P < 0.01) and Ruminococcus albus (P = 0.03). The relative population of R. albus was also greater (P = 0.04) for diets containing the sugarcane genotype with high NDFD. Feeding diets containing the sugarcane genotype with high NDFD increased Fibrobacter succinogenes population but only when sugarcane was fed as freshly cut (P = 0.02). Using sugarcane genotypes with high NDFD can increase intake and benefit fiber-degrading bacteria in the rumen.
引用
收藏
页码:5622 / 5634
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EFFECT OF MONENSIN FED WITH FORAGE ON DIGESTION AND RUMINAL ECOSYSTEM OF STEERS
    DINIUS, DA
    SIMPSON, ME
    MARSH, PB
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1976, 42 (01) : 229 - 234
  • [22] Effect of parota (Enterolobium cyclocarpum) pod protein supplement on feed intake and digestibility and calf ruminal characteristics
    Ulises Carbajal-Márquez
    Paulino Sánchez-Santillán
    Adelaido R. Rojas-García
    Marco A. Ayala-Monter
    Mario A. Mendoza-Núñez
    Daniel Hernández-Valenzuela
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2021, 53
  • [23] Effect of parota (Enterolobium cyclocarpum) pod protein supplement on feed intake and digestibility and calf ruminal characteristics
    Carbajal-Marquez, Ulises
    Sanchez-Santillan, Paulino
    Rojas-Garcia, Adelaido R.
    Ayala-Monter, Marco A.
    Mendoza-Nunez, Mario A.
    Hernandez-Valenzuela, Daniel
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2021, 53 (02)
  • [24] Digesta passage and nutrient digestibility in Boran steers at low feed intake levels
    Ali, Asep I. M.
    Wassie, Shimels E.
    Korir, Daniel
    Goopy, John P.
    Merbold, Lutz
    Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus
    Dickhoefer, Uta
    Schlecht, Eva
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2019, 103 (05) : 1325 - 1337
  • [25] Effect of ruminal ammonia supply on lysine utilization by growing steers
    Hussein, A. H.
    Batista, E. D.
    Miesner, M. D.
    Titgemeyer, E. C.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 (02) : 656 - 664
  • [26] Effects of xylanase supplementation on feed intake, digestibility and ruminal fermentation in Rambouillet sheep
    Vallejo, L. H.
    Salem, A. Z. M.
    Camacho, L. M.
    Kholif, A. M.
    Mariezcurrena, M. D.
    Cipriano, M.
    Alonso, M. U.
    Olivares, J.
    Lopez, S.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2016, 154 (06): : 1110 - 1117
  • [27] Effect of Fodder Tree as Fiber Sources in Total Mixed Ration on Feed Intake, Nutrient Digestibility, Chewing Behavior and Ruminal Fermentation in Beef Cattle
    Chumpawadee, S.
    Pimpa, O.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES, 2009, 8 (07): : 1279 - 1284
  • [28] Effect of Method of Adding a Fibrolytic Enzyme to Dairy Cow Diets on Feed Intake Digestibility, Milk Production, Ruminal Fermentation, and Blood Metabolites
    Dean, D. B.
    Staples, C. R.
    Littell, R. C.
    Kim, S.
    Adesogan, A. T.
    ANIMAL NUTRITION AND FEED TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 13 (03) : 337 - 353
  • [29] EFFECT OF CONSERVATION METHOD ON DIGESTIBILITY, NITROGEN-BALANCE, AND INTAKE OF ALFALFA
    CLANCY, M
    WANGSNESS, PJ
    BAUMGARDT, BR
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1977, 60 (04) : 572 - 579
  • [30] Feed intake and ruminal fermentation of proteins as a function of energetic and proteic food supplementation of steers
    Barbosa, NGS
    Lana, RD
    Jham, GN
    Borges, AC
    Mâncio, AB
    Pereira, JC
    Oliveira, JS
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 30 (05): : 1558 - 1565