Inequality in Social Insurance Participation and Generosity: Do Firm Characteristics Matter?

被引:15
|
作者
Gao, Qin [1 ]
Rickne, Johanna [2 ]
机构
[1] Fordham Univ, New York, NY 10023 USA
[2] Res Inst Ind Econ, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Social insurance; Employer behaviour; Inequality; China; CHINESE FIRMS; URBAN CHINA; LEVEL DATA; SECURITY; GROWTH; PRODUCTIVITY; OBLIGATIONS; INVESTMENT; DETERMINES; SHANGHAI;
D O I
10.1111/spol.12195
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Income inequality in China has been much documented and debated. However, one important aspect of income inequality - social insurance inequality - has been largely understudied. We use a large national panel of firm data to examine the possible influence of various firm characteristics on the inequalities in social insurance participation and generosity in the period 2004-07. Our findings reveal substantial ownership sector and regional gaps in social insurance provision by firms, with the private domestic sector and those in the central region lagging behind. Unionized firms, larger firms, and firms with greater market shares also tend to provide better social insurance to their employees. While being an exporting firm is linked with greater social insurance participation and generosity, being a purely exporting firm, however, is associated with reduced social insurance generosity. Lastly, highly educated workers receive substantially better social insurance coverage than their less educated peers. These social insurance inequalities are highly relevant as China pushes forward with establishing a unified social insurance system across urban-rural boundaries, ownership sectors and industries.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 775
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Association between physical activity participation and perceived social isolation at older ages: Do social participation, age and sex differences matter?
    Gyasi, Razak M.
    Adu-Gyamfi, Samuel
    Obeng, Bernard
    Asamoah, Edward
    Kisiangani, Isaac
    Ochieng, Vollan
    Appiah, Kubi
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2021, 96
  • [32] Effect of social participation on the development of physical frailty: Do type, frequency and diversity matter?
    Xie, Boqin
    Ma, Chenjuan
    [J]. MATURITAS, 2021, 151 : 48 - 54
  • [33] The Participation Gap: Social Status and Political Inequality
    Webb, Paul
    [J]. PARTY POLITICS, 2020, 26 (05) : 692 - 693
  • [34] The Participation Gap: Social Status and Political Inequality
    Pasquino, Gianfranco
    [J]. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2018, 89 (02): : 336 - 337
  • [35] Social inequality and participation in aging urban societies
    Ruessler, H.
    Koester, D.
    Heite, E.
    Stiel, J.
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2013, 46 (04): : 306 - 311
  • [36] The inequality debate: Do financial markets matter?
    Azmat, Saad
    Ayub, Ahmad
    Brown, Kym
    Skully, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2020, 27
  • [37] Idiosyncratic risk puzzle and its pricing: Do firm characteristics matter? Evidence of BRICS countries
    Kausar, Saba
    Rashid, Abdul
    Shah, Zulfiqar Ali
    [J]. BORSA ISTANBUL REVIEW, 2023, 23 (01) : 149 - 168
  • [38] Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Do firm size and age matter? Empirical evidence from European listed companies
    D'Amato, Antonio
    Falivena, Camilla
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (02) : 909 - 924
  • [39] Social and environmental protection: the effects of social insurance generosity on the acceptance of material sacrifices for the sake of environmental protection
    Sjostrand, Sverker
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2024,
  • [40] Do Enclaves Remediate Social Inequality?
    Karpowitz, Christopher F.
    Mendelberg, Tali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2018, 80 (04): : 1134 - 1149