Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy:: Results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized contours

被引:380
|
作者
Viswanathan, Akila N.
Dimopoulos, Johannes
Kirisits, Christian
Berger, Daniel
Potter, Richard
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiotherapy & Radiobiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
cervical cancer; brachytherapy; computed tomography; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.021
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the contours and dose-volume histograms (DVH) of the tumor and organs at risk (OAR) with computed tomography (CT) vs. magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical cancer brachytherapy. Methods and Materials: Ten patients underwent both MRI and CT after applicator insertion. The dose received by at least 90% of the volume (D-90), the minimal target dose (D-100), the volume treated to the prescription dose or greater for tumor for the high-risk (HR) and intermediate-risk (IR) clinical target volume (CTV) and the dose to 0.1 cm(3), 1 cm(3), and 2 cm(3) for the OARs were evaluated. A standardized approach to contouring on CT (CTStd) was developed, implemented (HR- and IR-CTVCTStd), and compared with the MRI contours. Results: Tumor height, thickness, and total volume measurements, as determined by either CT or CTStd were not significantly different compared with the MRI volumes. In contrast, the width measurements differed in HR-CTVCTStd (p = 0.05) and IR-CTVCTStd(p = 0.01). For the HR-CTVCTStd, this resulted in statistically significant differences in the volume treated to the prescription dose or greater (MRI, 96% vs. CTStd, 86 %, p = 0.01), D-100 (MRI, 5.4 vs. CTStd, 3.4, p < 0.01), and D-90 (MRI, 8.7 vs. CTStd, 6.7, p < 0.01). Correspondingly, the IR-CTV DVH values on MRI vs. CTStd, differed in the D-100 (MRI, 3.0 vs. CTStd, 2.2, p = 0.01) and D-90 (MRI, 5.6 vs. CTStd, 4.6, p = 0.02). The MRI and CT DVH values of the dose to 0.1 cm(3), 1 cm(3), and 2 cm(3) for the OARs were similar. Conclusion: Computed tomography-based or MRI-based scans at brachytherapy are adequate for OAR DVH analysis. However, CT tumor contours can significantly overestimate the tumor width, resulting in significant differences in the D90, D100, and volume treated to the prescription dose or greater for the HR-CTV compared with that using MRI. MRI remains the standard for CTV definition. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 498
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Changes in cervical cancer stage with the incorporation of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Botswana
    Anchondo, Magdalena
    Macduffie, Emily
    George, Jessica
    Kassick, Megan
    Ketlametswe, Rebecca
    Monare, Barati
    Bazzett-Matabele, Lisa
    Vulysteke, Peter
    Grover, Surbhi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (SUPPL_3) : A19 - A20
  • [22] Prospective comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in colorectal cancer staging
    Koh, Frederick H. X.
    Tan, Ker-Kan
    Teo, Lynette L. S.
    Ang, Bertrand W. L.
    Thian, Yee-Liang
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 88 (06) : E498 - E502
  • [23] Comparison of impact of target delineation of computed tomography- and magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy on dose distribution in cervical cancer
    Tuntipumiamorn, Lalida
    Lohasammakul, Suphalerk
    Dankulchai, Pittaya
    Nakkrasae, Pitchayut
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2018, 10 (05) : 418 - 424
  • [24] Use of 3D transabdominal ultrasound imaging for treatment planning in cervical cancer brachytherapy: Comparison to magnetic resonance and computed tomography
    St-Amant, Patricia
    Foster, William
    Froment, Marie-Anne
    Aubini, Sylviane
    Lavallee, Marie-Claude
    Beaulieu, Luc
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 16 (04) : 847 - 854
  • [25] Results of Definitive (Chemo)radiotherapy Using Computed Tomography-based Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer
    Aoshika, Tomomi
    Noda, Shin-ei
    Abe, Takanori
    Kumazaki, Yu
    Hirai, Ryuta
    Igari, Mitsunobu
    Saito, Satoshi
    Ryuno, Yasuhiro
    Iino, Misaki
    Takeda, Yuga
    Ohta, Tomohiro
    Watanabe, Jun
    Tsukahara, Keita
    Kato, Shingo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 44 (04) : 1583 - 1589
  • [26] Positron emission tomography versus computed tomography -guided intracavitary brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A prospective randomized study
    Sarawagi, Rashmi
    Sharma, Daya Nand
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Subramani, Vellaiyan
    Kumar, Sunesh
    Pandey, Rambha
    Binjola, Ashish
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2025, 21 (01) : 151 - 155
  • [27] Prospective, blinded trial of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography positron emission tomography in staging primary and recurrent cancer of the head and neck
    O'Neill, J. P.
    Moynagh, M.
    Kavanagh, E.
    O'Dwyer, T.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2010, 124 (12): : 1274 - 1277
  • [28] Magnetic resonance imaging-based pseudo computed tomography using anatomic signature and joint dictionary learning
    Lei, Yang
    Shu, Hui-Kuo
    Tian, Sibo
    Jeong, Jiwoong Jason
    Liu, Tian
    Shim, Hyunsuk
    Mao, Hui
    Wang, Tonghe
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    Curran, Walter J.
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 5 (03)
  • [29] Computed Tomography Alone Versus Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Identification of Occult Injuries to the Cervical Spine: A Meta-Analysis
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Bono, Christopher M.
    McGuire, Kevin J.
    Warholic, Natalie
    Harris, Mitchel B.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 68 (01): : 109 - 113
  • [30] MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-GUIDED INTRACAVITARY BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CANCER OF CERVIX: PRELIMINARY RESULTS.
    Iturre, E. Villafranca
    Romero, P.
    Sola, A.
    Asin, G.
    Rico, M.
    Vila, M.
    Lozares, S.
    Pellejero, S.
    Sanchez, C.
    Muruzabal, J. C.
    Aguirre, S.
    Chicata, V.
    Manterola, A.
    Martinez, E.
    Arias, F.
    Dominguez, M. A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 91 : S37 - S37