Fragility-based seismic performance assessment of modular underground arch bridges

被引:13
|
作者
Nguyen, Van-Toan [1 ]
Ahn, Jin-Hee [2 ]
Haldar, Achintya [3 ]
Huh, Jungwon [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
[2] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Dept Civil & Infrastruct Engn, Jinju 52725, South Korea
[3] Univ Arizona, Dept Civil Engn & Engn Mech, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
Modular underground arch bridge; Seismic performance; Stratum-uncertainty characteristics; Damage states; Fragility-based analysis; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT; INTENSITY MEASURE; MOUNTAIN TUNNELS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; DAMAGE; PRECAST; METHODOLOGY; DESIGN; DAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.005
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Seismic performance assessment of modular underground arch bridges (MUABs) can help mitigate structural damage to MUABs during earthquakes. This study proposed an efficient procedure to evaluate the seismic performance of a three-hinge MUAB by using fragility-based analysis. Firstly, a novel proposal for damage states was presented using the relationship between the crack depth and thickness of the arch component. The relationship between ground motion intensity and structural failure probability was then described using stratum uncertainty characteristics. The multiple stripe analysis approach with the maximum likelihood function was introduced to detail the uncertainty characteristics of strata by allowing various ground motions at distinct seismic intensity levels. Finally, the collapse probability considering stratum-uncertainty characteristics was specified for seismic intensity and probability levels. The results revealed that the proposed procedure to randomly select ground motions from the strong-motion database of the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center is feasible for evaluating the seismic vulnerability of MUABs. Therefore, the seismic performance of MUABs can be reasonably predicted under earthquakes.
引用
收藏
页码:1218 / 1230
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fragility-Based Improvement of System Seismic Performance for Long-Span Suspension Bridges
    Lu, Guanya
    Wang, Kehai
    Qiu, Wenhua
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [2] Seismic fragility assessment of UHPC ribbed arch bridges
    Yan, Banfu
    Lai, Junjiang
    Wu, Suiwen
    Feng, Shipeng
    Meng, Xiangcheng
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2025, 190
  • [3] Fragility-based system performance assessment of critical power infrastructure
    Zhang, Jintao
    Bagtzoglou, Yiannis
    Zhu, Jin
    Li, Baikun
    Zhang, Wei
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 232
  • [4] Masonry arch bridges fragility assessment
    Tecchio, G.
    da Porto, F.
    Thiella, C.
    Dona, M.
    Modena, C.
    MAINTENANCE, MONITORING, SAFETY, RISK AND RESILIENCE OF BRIDGES AND BRIDGE NETWORKS, 2016, : 520 - 520
  • [5] Fragility-based robustness assessment of steel modular building systems: Connection and building height
    Emamikoupaei, Amirhossein
    Tsavdaridis, Konstantinos Daniel
    Bigdeli, Ali
    Saffarzadeh, Kimia
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2025, 226
  • [6] Fragility-based assessment of public buildings in Turkey
    Bilgin, Huseyin
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2013, 56 : 1283 - 1294
  • [7] Fragility-based sensitivity analysis on the seismic performance of pile-group-supported bridges in liquefiable ground undergoing scour potentials
    Wang, Xiaowei
    Ye, Aijun
    Ji, Bohai
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 198
  • [8] Seismic assessment of masonry arch bridges
    Pela, Luca
    Aprile, Alessandra
    Benedetti, Andrea
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2009, 31 (08) : 1777 - 1788
  • [9] Fragility-based probabilistic seismic safety assessment of RC frame structures with infilled masonry walls
    Yu, Xiaohui
    Li, Yanjun
    Lu, Dagang
    Jia, Mingming
    Fan, Feng
    Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 47 : 260 - 265
  • [10] Reliability-based seismic performance of masonry arch bridges
    Gonen, Semih
    Soyoz, Serdar
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2022, 18 (12) : 1658 - 1673