Beyond the Paris Agreement: Intellectual Property, Innovation Policy, and Climate Justice

被引:9
|
作者
Rimmer, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Law, Intellectual Property & Innovat, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
关键词
intellectual property; technology transfer; innovation law; innovation policy; climate law; climate justice; climate finance;
D O I
10.3390/laws8010007
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The multidisciplinary field of climate law and justice needs to address the topic of intellectual property, climate finance, and technology transfer to ensure effective global action on climate change. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 1992 (UNFCCC) established a foundation for the development, application and diffusion of low-carbon technologies. Against this background, it is useful to analyse how the Paris Agreement 2015 deals with the subject of intellectual property, technology transfer, and climate change. While there was discussion of a number of options for intellectual property and climate change, the final Paris Agreement 2015 contains no text on intellectual property. There is text, though, on technology transfer. The Paris Agreement 2015 relies upon technology networks and alliances in order to promote the diffusion and dissemination of green technologies. In order to achieve technology transfer, there has been an effort to rely on a number of formal technology networks, alliances, and public-private partnerships-including the UNFCCC Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN); the World Intellectual Property Organization's WIPO GREEN; Mission Innovation; the Breakthrough Energy Coalition; and the International Solar Alliance. There have been grand hopes and ambitions in respect of these collaborative and co-operative ventures. However, there have also been significant challenges in terms of funding, support, and operation. In a case of innovation policy pluralism, there also seems to be a significant level of overlap and duplication between the diverse international initiatives. There have been concerns about whether such technology networks are effective, efficient, adaptable, and accountable. There is a need to better align intellectual property, innovation policy, and technology transfer in order to achieve access to clean energy and climate justice under the framework of the Paris Agreement 2015. At a conceptual level, philosophical discussions about climate justice should be grounded in pragmatic considerations about intellectual property and technology transfer. An intellectual property mechanism is necessary to provide for research, development, and deployment of clean technologies. There is a need to ensure that the technology mechanism of the Paris Agreement 2015 can enable the research, development, and diffusion of clean technologies at a scale to address the global challenges of climate change.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing the Policy gaps for achieving China's climate targets in the Paris Agreement
    Gallagher, Kelly Sims
    Zhang, Fang
    Orvis, Robbie
    Rissman, Jeffrey
    Liu, Qiang
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [32] Assessing the Policy gaps for achieving China’s climate targets in the Paris Agreement
    Kelly Sims Gallagher
    Fang Zhang
    Robbie Orvis
    Jeffrey Rissman
    Qiang Liu
    Nature Communications, 10
  • [33] The Paris agreement and key actors' domestic climate policy mixes: comparative patterns
    Skjaerseth, Jon Birger
    Andresen, Steinar
    Bang, Guri
    Heggelund, Gorild M.
    INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2021, 21 (01) : 59 - 73
  • [34] The Paris agreement and key actors’ domestic climate policy mixes: comparative patterns
    Jon Birger Skjærseth
    Steinar Andresen
    Guri Bang
    Gørild M. Heggelund
    International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2021, 21 : 59 - 73
  • [35] A Climate Policy Shock? - Measuring the Impact of the Paris Agreement on the Oil and Gas Industry
    Universidade NOVA de Lisboa
    1600,
  • [36] Global health and Brazilian foreign policy: the negotiations on innovation and intellectual property
    da Silva Lima, Jordao Horacio
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2017, 22 (07): : 2213 - 2221
  • [37] Working Within the Boundaries of Intellectual Property - Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society
    Ullrich, Hanns
    IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2011, 42 (02) : 248 - 250
  • [38] Outbound Open Innovation Policy for Unexploited Public Funded Intellectual Property
    Hashim, Haswira Nor Mohamad
    Zuallcobley, Rohazar Wati
    Mahmood, Anida
    Zakuan, Zeti Zuryani Mohd
    Ahmad, Adizul
    2018 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING EDUCATION (ICEED), 2018, : 105 - 110
  • [39] INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND CORRECTIVE JUSTICE
    COLEMAN, JL
    VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1992, 78 (01) : 283 - 292
  • [40] The unavoidability of justice - and order - in international climate politics: From Kyoto to Paris and beyond
    Falkner, Robert
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2019, 21 (02): : 270 - 278