Response of beams on a tensionless extensible geosynthetic-reinforced earth bed subjected to moving loads

被引:32
|
作者
Maheshwari, P [1 ]
Chandra, S [1 ]
Basudhar, PK [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
geosynthetic; tensionless foundation; reinforced granular fill; infinite beam; moving load; winkler foundation; extensible reinforcement;
D O I
10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.07.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper analysis of an infinite beam resting on reinforced granular bed overlying a soft soil strata subjected to a moving load with constant velocity is presented. The separation between the beam and ground surface is taken into the account while analyzing the system. The upper reinforced granular bed is modeled by a rough membrane embedded in Pasternak shear layer overlying a series of compressible Winkler springs representing the underlying soft soil. The extensible geosynthetic is assumed to deform such that at interface the geosynthetic and the soil have same deformation. This condition eliminates the two interfacial shear stress parameters and at the same time also incorporates the stiffness of geosynthetic in the model. The lift up of the beam and mobilized tension in the geosynthetic layer are observed to be more for the tensionless foundation as compared to that reacting in tension and compression. It has been further observed that the flexural response of the infinite beam as well as of the reinforcement, are greatly affected by the velocity, intensity of load, relative compressibility of granular fill and stiffness of the geosynthetic. For the range of parameters studied the shear moduli of granular layers do not significantly affect the response of the beam. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 548
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Model tests of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with marginal backfill subjected to rainfall
    Yang, Kuo-Hsin
    Wu, Hsin-Ming
    Tseng, Ting -Ling
    Yoo, Chungsik
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2023, 51 (02) : 342 - 359
  • [42] Seismic response analysis of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining wall
    Bathurst, RJ
    Hatami, K
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 5 (1-2) : 127 - 166
  • [43] Limit Equilibrium Analysis of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Retaining Walls Subjected to Footing Loading
    Rahmaninezhad, S. Mustapha
    Han, Jie
    Al-Naddaf, Mahdi
    ENGINEERING, MONITORING, AND MANAGEMENT OF GEOTECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (GEO-CONGRESS 2020 ), 2020, (316): : 464 - 471
  • [44] Energy analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced slope in unsaturated soils subjected to steady flow
    Xu Jing-shu
    Du Xiu-li
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY, 2019, 26 (07) : 1769 - 1779
  • [45] Deformation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Beam Subjected to Localized Sinkholes by the Winkler Model
    Zhou, Yitao
    Chen, Fuquan
    SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING, 2022, 59 (02) : 119 - 125
  • [46] Deformation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Beam Subjected to Localized Sinkholes by the Winkler Model
    Yitao Zhou
    Fuquan Chen
    Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2022, 59 : 119 - 125
  • [47] Analytical study of the dynamic response of a double-beam model for a geosynthetic-reinforced embankment under traffic loads
    Zhang, Ling
    Ou, Qiang
    Zhou, Shuai
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2020, 118
  • [48] A Mechanical Model and Solution for Dynamic Response of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Pile-Supported Embankment under Traveling Loads
    Hou, Ru-Yi
    Zheng, Jun-Jie
    Fang, Hao
    Yang, Wen-Yu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [49] Response of fractionally damped beams with general boundary conditions subjected to moving loads
    Abu-Mallouh, R.
    Abu-Alshaikh, I.
    Zibdeh, H. S.
    Ramadan, Khaled
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2012, 19 (03) : 333 - 347
  • [50] An Assessment of the Factors that Contribute to the Poor Performance of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Earth Retaining Walls
    Valentine, R. J.
    DESIGN AND PRACTICE OF GEOSYNTHETIC-REINFORCED SOIL STRUCTURES, 2013, : 318 - 327