An analysis of interplanetary sources of geomagnetic storm during November 7-8, 1998

被引:2
|
作者
Le GuiMing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tang YuHua [1 ]
Zheng Liang [5 ]
Liu LianGuang [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Dept Astron, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China
[2] China Meteorol Adm, Natl Ctr Space Weather, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] China Meteorol Adm, Key Lab Radiometr Calibrat & Validat Environm Sat, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] N China Elect Power Univ, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Univ, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
来源
CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN | 2010年 / 55卷 / 09期
基金
国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划); 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
geomagnetic storm; magnetic cloud; interplanetary shock; sheath; south component of interplanetary magnetic field; SOLAR-WIND;
D O I
10.1007/s11434-009-0228-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We analyzed the properties of the solar wind appeared during November 7-8, 1998. Results show that the spaceship ACE spotted a shock (hereinafter referred to as the first shock) at 07:33 UT, November 7. The sheath appeared from the first shock to 22:00 UT November 7. A magnetic cloud-like (MCL) was observed during the period from 22:00 UT November 7 to 11:50 UT, November 8. Another shock was observed at 04:19 UT, November 8 (the second shock). It is apparent that the second shock has entered the rear part of the MCL (MCL_2), though the former part of the MCL (MCL_1) was not affected by the second shock. The main phase of the geomagnetic storm is split into three steps for the convenience of SYM-H index analysis. Step I covers the period from the sudden storm commence (SSC) at 08:15 UT, November 7 to the moment of 22:44 UT, November 7. Step 2 starts from 22:44 UT, November 7 and ends at 04:51 UT, November 8. The last step runs from 04:51 UT, November 8 to 06:21 UT, November 8. Step 2 has played a key role in the main development phase of the geomagnetic storm. Analysis of the solar wind properties associated with the main phase shows that the three steps in the main phase have sheath, MCL_1, and MCL_2 as their respective interplanetary source. Specifically, the sheath is covered by the solar wind data from 07:33 UT to 22:00 UT, November 7, MCL1 by the solar wind data from 22:00 UT, November 7 to 04:19 UT November 8, and MCL_2 by the solar wind data from 04:19 UT to 05:57 UT, November 8. MCL_1 had a strong and long lasting so UTh directed magnetic field, allowing it to play a key role in the development of the main phase. MCL_2 made a much smaller contribution to the main development phase, compared with MCL_1.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 856
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SUPPLEMENTARY SOURCES OF GEOMAGNETIC DEPRESSION DURING THE GEOMAGNETIC STORM OF 8-9 FEBRUARY 1986
    BELOVA, EG
    MALTSEV, YP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 1994, 56 (08): : 1011 - 1015
  • [22] Characteristics of GNSS Total Electron Content Enhancements Over the Midlatitudes During a Geomagnetic Storm on 7 and 8 November 2004
    Sori, T.
    Shinbori, A.
    Otsuka, Y.
    Tsugawa, T.
    Nishioka, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2019, 124 (12) : 10376 - 10394
  • [23] Daytime Low and Middle Latitudes Plasma Density Enhancements Observed by Swarm Constellation during the 7-8 September 2017 Geomagnetic Storm
    Liu, Ruoxiao
    Zou, Yuhua
    [J]. 2019 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPACE SCIENCE AND COMMUNICATION (ICONSPACE2019), 2019, : 14 - 18
  • [24] Ionospheric Response at Conjugate Locations During the 7-8 September 2017 Geomagnetic Storm Over the Europe-African Longitude Sector
    Habarulema, John Bosco
    Katamzi-Joseph, Zama T.
    Buresova, Dalia
    Nndanganeni, Rendani
    Matamba, Tshimangadzo
    Tshisaphungo, Mpho
    Buchert, Stephan
    Kosch, Michael
    Lotz, Stefan
    Cilliers, Pierre
    Mahrous, Ayman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2020, 125 (10)
  • [25] Large Magnetic Storm on September 7-8, 2017: High-Latitude Geomagnetic Variations and Geomagnetic Pc5 Pulsations
    Kleimenova, N. G.
    Gromova, L. I.
    Gromov, S. V.
    Malysheva, L. M.
    [J]. GEOMAGNETISM AND AERONOMY, 2018, 58 (05) : 597 - 606
  • [26] Energy dissipation during a geomagnetic storm: May 1998
    Pulkkinen, TI
    Ganushkina, NY
    Kallio, EI
    Lu, G
    Baker, DN
    Turner, NE
    Fritz, TA
    Fennell, JF
    Roeder, J
    [J]. ADVANCES IN GLOBAL MAGNETOSPHERIC STRUCTURE, DYNAMICS, AND REGION COUPLING, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 30 (10): : 2231 - 2240
  • [27] Impact of geomagnetic storm of September 7-8, 2017 on ionosphere and HF propagation: A multi-instrument study
    Blagoveshchensky, D. V.
    Sergeeva, M. A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (01) : 239 - 256
  • [28] CAWSES November 7-8, 2004, superstorm: Complex solar and interplanetary features in the post-solar maximum phase
    Tsurutani, Bruce T.
    Echer, Ezequiel
    Guarnieri, Fernando L.
    Kozyra, J. U.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [29] Solar sources of interplanetary shocks on November 7–11, 2004
    K. G. Ivanov
    [J]. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2011, 51 : 23 - 27
  • [30] Analysis of Large Geomagnetically Induced Currents During the 7-8 September 2017 Storm: Geoelectric Field Mapping
    Wawrzaszek, Anna
    Gil, Agnieszka
    Modzelewska, Renata
    Tsurutani, Bruce T. T.
    Wawrzaszek, Roman
    [J]. SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 21 (03):