Oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists for treating endometriosis-associated pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Yan, Hailan [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Jinghua [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaoyan [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Yushi [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Gu, Zhiyue [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Chenyu [1 ,2 ]
Leng, Jinhua [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Clin Res Ctr Obstet & Gynecol Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Endometriosis; oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists; pain; Bayesian; network meta-analysis; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GNRH ANTAGONIST; DOUBLE-BLIND; INCONSISTENCY; ELAGOLIX; CONSENSUS; AGONISTS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.856
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To review the use of oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists and synthesize their efficacy and safety parameters for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Premenopausal women with endometriosis who had experienced moderate or severe pain. Intervention(s): The Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and MEDLINE were searched until April 10, 2022. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was used to perform indirect comparisons. I-2 was used to assess the global heterogeneity. Relative treatment estimates were performed. Treatment ranking was performed through the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Main Outcome Measure(s): Endometriosis-associated pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and noncyclic pelvic pain reduction. Result: (s): Five studies and 6 randomized controlled trials, including a total of 2,796 women and 10 different doses of oral GnRH antagonist treatments, were eligible for inclusion. All studies were considered to have a low risk of bias. Almost all efficacy- and safety-related outcomes showed a dose-response relationship. Regarding endometriosis-associated pain, the top 3 treatments were elagolix 400 mg, linzagolix 75 mg, and linzagolix 200 mg, with mean differences of -1.26 (95% credible interval [CrI], -1.70 to -0.79), -0.98 (95% CrI, -1.84 to -0.15), and -0.98 (95% CrI, -1.90 to -0.064), respectively. The top 3 treatments to decrease dysmenorrhea were relugolix 40 mg, elagolix 400 mg, and relugolix 20 mg, with mean differences of -1.60 (95% CrI, -2.07 to -1.14), -1.25 (95% CrI, -1.56 to -0.95), and -1.10 (95% CrI, -1.59 to -0.62), respectively. However, only high-dose treatments were significantly associated with most quality of life- and adverse effect-related outcomes. Relugolix 40 and 20 mg and elagolix 400 mg, with odds ratios of 6.88 (95% CrI, 2.18-24.58), 1.60 (95% CrI, 0.62-4.13), and 1.85 (95% CrI, 1.05-3.30), had a significantly increased incidence of adverse events. Conclusion: (s): Oral GnRH antagonists are effective for endometriosis-associated pain and dysmenorrhea and the patient global impression. The incidence of ovarian hypoestrogenic effects in a short-term duration was significant in a dose-effect response, particularly the highest dose. (C) 2022 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1102 / 1116
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Maintenance therapy involving a tapering dose of danazol or mid/low doses of oral contraceptive after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain
    Kitawaki, Jo
    Ishihara, Hiroaki
    Kiyomizu, Miyo
    Honjo, Hideo
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 89 (06) : 1831 - 1835
  • [32] The effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiao, Jinsong
    Chang, Shuang
    Chen, Shuangyun
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (06) : 1594 - +
  • [33] Ovarian protection and safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist after cervical cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yuan, Jialing
    Lai, Yi
    Li, Tao
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (07)
  • [34] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog cotreatment for preservation of ovarian function during gonadotoxic chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bedaiwy, Mohamed A.
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
    Desai, Nina
    Hurd, William
    Starks, David
    El-Nashar, Sherif A.
    Al-Inany, Hesham G.
    Falcone, Tommaso
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (03) : 906 - U94
  • [35] Why do oestrogens matter: systematic review and meta-analysis assessing GnRH antagonists, considering add-back therapy, for endometriosis-associated pain
    Viviano, Manuela
    Benagiano, Giuseppe
    Guo, Sun-Wei
    Pluchino, Nicola
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2024, 49 (04)
  • [36] Effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists on intrauterine insemination cycles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis
    Luo, Shan
    Li, Shangwei
    Li, Xiaohong
    Bai, Yu
    Jin, Song
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 30 (04) : 255 - 259
  • [37] Clinical Pharmacology of Elagolix: An Oral Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonist for Endometriosis
    Mohamad Shebley
    Akshanth R. Polepally
    Ahmed Nader
    Juki W. Ng
    Insa Winzenborg
    Cheri E. Klein
    Peter Noertersheuser
    Megan A. Gibbs
    Nael M. Mostafa
    [J]. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2020, 59 : 297 - 309
  • [38] Differences between gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and oral contraceptives for the treatment of endometriosis
    Aisaka, K
    Doi, M
    Ikezuki, Y
    Obata, S
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (04): : 63S - 63S
  • [39] Clinical Pharmacology of Elagolix: An Oral Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonist for Endometriosis
    Shebley, Mohamad
    Polepally, Akshanth R.
    Nader, Ahmed
    Ng, Juki W.
    Winzenborg, Insa
    Klein, Cheri E.
    Noertersheuser, Peter
    Gibbs, Megan A.
    Mostafa, Nael M.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2020, 59 (03) : 297 - 309
  • [40] Laparoscopic Excision Versus Ablation for Endometriosis-Associated Pain: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (Expression of Concern of 2017)
    Pundir, J.
    Omanwa, K.
    Kovoor, E.
    Pundir, V
    Lancaster, G.
    Barton-Smith, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 31 (01) : 69 - 69