Performance Comparison between Particle Swarm Optimization and Differential Evolution Algorithms for Postman Delivery Routing Problem

被引:4
|
作者
Wisittipanich, Warisa [1 ]
Phoungthong, Khamphe [2 ]
Srisuwannapa, Chanin [3 ]
Baisukhan, Adirek [3 ]
Wisittipanit, Nuttachat [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Fac Engn, Ctr Healthcare Engn Syst, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[2] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Environm Management, Environm Assessment & Technol Hazardous Waste Man, Hat Yai 90112, Thailand
[3] Mae Fah Luang Univ, Sch Sci, Dept Mat Engn, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
[4] Mae Fah Luang Univ, Ctr Innovat Mat Sustainabil iMatS, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 06期
关键词
postman delivery; vehicle routing problem; particle swarm optimization algorithm; differential evolution algorithm; SOLVE;
D O I
10.3390/app11062703
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Generally, transportation costs account for approximately half of the total operation expenses of a logistics firm. Therefore, any effort to optimize the planning of vehicle routing would be substantially beneficial to the company. This study focuses on a postman delivery routing problem of the Chiang Rai post office, located in the Chiang Rai province of Thailand. In this study, two metaheuristic methods-particle swarm optimization (PSO) and differential evolution (DE)-were applied with particular solution representation to find delivery routings with minimum travel distances. The performances of PSO and DE were compared along with those from current practices. The results showed that PSO and DE clearly outperformed the actual routing of the current practices in all the operational days examined. Moreover, DE performances were notably superior to those of PSO.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimization for a Multicast Routing Problem
    Marinakis, Yannis
    Migdalas, Athanasios
    EXAMINING ROBUSTNESS AND VULNERABILITY OF NETWORKED SYSTEMS, 2014, 37 : 161 - 175
  • [32] A conceptual comparison of the Cuckoo-search, particle swarm optimization, differential evolution and artificial bee colony algorithms
    Civicioglu, Pinar
    Besdok, Erkan
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2013, 39 (04) : 315 - 346
  • [33] A conceptual comparison of the Cuckoo-search, particle swarm optimization, differential evolution and artificial bee colony algorithms
    Pinar Civicioglu
    Erkan Besdok
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2013, 39 : 315 - 346
  • [34] Quantum-Inspired Differential Evolution with Particle Swarm Optimization for Knapsack Problem
    Zouache, Djaafar
    Moussaoui, Abdelouahab
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 31 (05) : 1757 - 1773
  • [35] Particle swarm optimization algorithm with differential evolution
    Hao, Zhi-Feng
    Guo, Guang-Han
    Huang, Han
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2007, : 1031 - +
  • [36] Differential evolution based particle swarm optimization
    Omran, Mahamed G. H.
    Engelbrecht, Andries P.
    Salman, Ayed
    2007 IEEE SWARM INTELLIGENCE SYMPOSIUM, 2007, : 112 - +
  • [37] Clustering with Differential Evolution Particle Swarm Optimization
    Xu, Rui
    Xu, Jie
    Wunsch, Donald C., II
    2010 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2010,
  • [38] A Comparison on the Search of Particle Swarm Optimization and Differential Evolution on Multi-Objective Optimization
    Hernandez Dominguez, Jorge S.
    Pulido, Gregorio Toscano
    2011 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2011, : 1978 - 1985
  • [39] Performance Evaluation of Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms for Optimizing Power Loss in a Worm Gear Mechanism
    Sabarinath, P.
    Thansekhar, M. R.
    Saravanan, R.
    POWER ELECTRONICS AND RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2015, 326 : 433 - 441
  • [40] A Hybrid Algorithm based on Differential Evolution, Particle Swarm Optimization and Harmony Search Algorithms
    Ulker, Ezgi Deniz
    Haydar, Ali
    2013 FEDERATED CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS), 2013, : 417 - 421