Dissemination and implementation research in dementia care: a systematic scoping review and evidence map

被引:49
|
作者
Lourida, Ilianna [1 ]
Abbott, Rebecca A. [1 ]
Rogers, Morwenna [1 ]
Lang, Iain A. [1 ]
Stein, Ken [1 ]
Kent, Bridie [2 ]
Coon, Jo Thompson [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula PenCLAHRC, St Lukes Campus, Exeter EX1 2LU, Devon, England
[2] Plymouth Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Plymouth, Devon, England
关键词
Dementia care; Implementation; Dissemination; Strategies; Scoping review; GUIDELINE IMPLEMENTATION; HEALTH-CARE; INTERVENTIONS; STRATEGIES; PEOPLE; RECOMMENDATIONS; COMPILATION; PREVALENCE; BARRIERS; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-017-0528-y
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: The need to better understand implementing evidence-informed dementia care has been recognised in multiple priority-setting partnerships. The aim of this scoping review was to give an overview of the state of the evidence on implementation and dissemination of dementia care, and create a systematic evidence map. Methods: We sought studies that addressed dissemination and implementation strategies or described barriers and facilitators to implementation across dementia stages and care settings. Twelve databases were searched from inception to October 2015 followed by forward citation and grey literature searches. Quantitative studies with a comparative research design and qualitative studies with recognised methods of data collection were included. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers with discrepancies resolved by a third where necessary. Data extraction was performed by one reviewer and checked by a second. Strategies were mapped according to the ERIC compilation. Results: Eighty-eight studies were included (30 quantitative, 34 qualitative and 24 mixed-methods studies). Approximately 60% of studies reported implementation strategies to improve practice: training and education of professionals (94%), promotion of stakeholder interrelationships (69%) and evaluative strategies (46%) were common; financial strategies were rare (15%). Nearly 70% of studies reported barriers or facilitators of care practices primarily within residential care settings. Organisational factors, including time constraints and increased workload, were recurrent barriers, whereas leadership and managerial support were often reported to promote implementation. Less is known about implementation activities in primary care and hospital settings, or the views and experiences of people with dementia and their family caregivers. Conclusion: This scoping review and mapping of the evidence reveals a paucity of robust evidence to inform the successful dissemination and implementation of evidence-based dementia care. Further exploration of the most appropriate methods to evaluate and report initiatives to bring about change and of the effectiveness of implementation strategies is necessary if we are to make changes in practice that improve dementia care.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What hinders and facilitates the implementation of nurse-led interventions in dementia care? A scoping review
    Karrer, Melanie
    Hirt, Julian
    Zeller, Adelheid
    Saxer, Susi
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [42] What influences the implementation of natural climate solutions? A systematic map and review of the evidence
    Schulte, Ingrid
    Eggers, Juliana
    Nielsen, Jonas O.
    Fuss, Sabine
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [43] Evidence Gap and Knowledge Map of Physical Activity Research in Diabetes in Iran: A Scoping Review
    Sanjari, Mahnaz
    Esmaeili, Shahnaz
    Yarmohammadi, Hossein
    Atlasi, Rasha
    Aalaa, Maryam
    Larijani, Bagher
    Nasli-Esfahani, Ensieh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2021, 19 (02)
  • [44] Protocol for conducting scoping reviews to map implementation strategies in different care settings: focusing on evidence-based interventions for preselected phenomena in people with dementia
    Manietta, Christina
    Quasdorf, Tina
    Rommerskirch-Manietta, Mike
    Braunwarth, Jana Isabelle
    Purwins, Daniel
    Roes, Martina
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [45] A systematic scoping review and synthesis of dementia and communication theory
    Ennis, Liam
    Mansell, Warren
    McEvoy, Phil
    Tai, Sara
    [J]. DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 18 (06): : 2261 - 2281
  • [46] The Culture of Research: A Systematic Scoping Review
    Tikhonova, Elena
    Raitskaya, Lilia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2024, 10 (01): : 5 - 24
  • [47] Gender, citizenship and dementia care: a scoping review of studies to inform policy and future research
    Bartlett, Ruth
    Gjernes, Trude
    Lotherington, Ann-Therese
    Obstefelder, Aud
    [J]. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2018, 26 (01) : 14 - 26
  • [48] Pharmacological Treatment of Dementia: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews
    van de Glind, Esther M. M.
    van Enst, Wynanda A.
    van Munster, Barbara C.
    Rikkert, Marcel G. M. Olde
    Scheltens, Philip
    Scholten, Rob J. P. M.
    Hooft, Lotty
    [J]. DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2013, 36 (3-4) : 211 - 228
  • [49] Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Paterson, Charlotte
    Leduc, Caleb
    Maxwell, Margaret
    Aust, Birgit
    Amann, Benedikt L.
    Cerga-Pashoja, Arlinda
    Coppens, Evelien
    Couwenbergh, Chrisje
    O'Connor, Cliodhna
    Arensman, Ella
    Greiner, Birgit A.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [50] Framework of policy recommendations for implementation of evidence-based practice: a systematic scoping review
    Ubbink, Dirk T.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Vermeulen, Hester
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (01):