Dissemination and implementation research in dementia care: a systematic scoping review and evidence map

被引:49
|
作者
Lourida, Ilianna [1 ]
Abbott, Rebecca A. [1 ]
Rogers, Morwenna [1 ]
Lang, Iain A. [1 ]
Stein, Ken [1 ]
Kent, Bridie [2 ]
Coon, Jo Thompson [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula PenCLAHRC, St Lukes Campus, Exeter EX1 2LU, Devon, England
[2] Plymouth Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Plymouth, Devon, England
关键词
Dementia care; Implementation; Dissemination; Strategies; Scoping review; GUIDELINE IMPLEMENTATION; HEALTH-CARE; INTERVENTIONS; STRATEGIES; PEOPLE; RECOMMENDATIONS; COMPILATION; PREVALENCE; BARRIERS; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-017-0528-y
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: The need to better understand implementing evidence-informed dementia care has been recognised in multiple priority-setting partnerships. The aim of this scoping review was to give an overview of the state of the evidence on implementation and dissemination of dementia care, and create a systematic evidence map. Methods: We sought studies that addressed dissemination and implementation strategies or described barriers and facilitators to implementation across dementia stages and care settings. Twelve databases were searched from inception to October 2015 followed by forward citation and grey literature searches. Quantitative studies with a comparative research design and qualitative studies with recognised methods of data collection were included. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers with discrepancies resolved by a third where necessary. Data extraction was performed by one reviewer and checked by a second. Strategies were mapped according to the ERIC compilation. Results: Eighty-eight studies were included (30 quantitative, 34 qualitative and 24 mixed-methods studies). Approximately 60% of studies reported implementation strategies to improve practice: training and education of professionals (94%), promotion of stakeholder interrelationships (69%) and evaluative strategies (46%) were common; financial strategies were rare (15%). Nearly 70% of studies reported barriers or facilitators of care practices primarily within residential care settings. Organisational factors, including time constraints and increased workload, were recurrent barriers, whereas leadership and managerial support were often reported to promote implementation. Less is known about implementation activities in primary care and hospital settings, or the views and experiences of people with dementia and their family caregivers. Conclusion: This scoping review and mapping of the evidence reveals a paucity of robust evidence to inform the successful dissemination and implementation of evidence-based dementia care. Further exploration of the most appropriate methods to evaluate and report initiatives to bring about change and of the effectiveness of implementation strategies is necessary if we are to make changes in practice that improve dementia care.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dissemination and implementation research in dementia care: a systematic scoping review and evidence map
    Ilianna Lourida
    Rebecca A Abbott
    Morwenna Rogers
    Iain A Lang
    Ken Stein
    Bridie Kent
    Jo Thompson Coon
    [J]. BMC Geriatrics, 17
  • [2] Mapping the evidence on dementia care pathways - A scoping review
    Saragosa, Marianne
    MacEachern, Evan
    Chiu, Mary
    Weylie, Sean
    Schneider, Krista
    Maloney, Elaine R.
    Holland, Jordanne
    Kuluski, Kerry
    Orchanian-Cheff, Ani
    Nelson, Michelle L. A.
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [3] A systematic literature review of incontinence care for persons with dementia: the research evidence
    Hagglund, Doris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2010, 19 (3-4) : 303 - 312
  • [4] Implementation and dissemination of home and community-based interventions for informal caregivers of people living with dementia: a systematic scoping review
    Zhu, Eden M.
    Buljac-Samardzic, Martina
    Ahaus, Kees
    Sevdalis, Nick
    Huijsman, Robbert
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2023, 18
  • [5] Priority domains, aims, and testable hypotheses for implementation research: Protocol for a scoping review and evidence map
    Bryan R. Garner
    Sheila V. Patel
    M. Alexis Kirk
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [6] Priority domains, aims, and testable hypotheses for implementation research: Protocol for a scoping review and evidence map
    Garner, Bryan R.
    Patel, Sheila, V
    Kirk, M. Alexis
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [7] Implementation research in emergency medicine: a systematic scoping review
    Tavender, Emma J.
    Bosch, Marije
    Fiander, Michelle
    Knott, Jonathan C.
    Gruen, Russell L.
    O'Connor, Denise
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2016, 33 (09) : 652 - 659
  • [8] Implementation and dissemination of home- and community-based interventions for informal caregivers of people living with dementia: a systematic scoping review
    Eden Meng Zhu
    Martina Buljac-Samardžić
    Kees Ahaus
    Nick Sevdalis
    Robbert Huijsman
    [J]. Implementation Science, 18
  • [9] Implementation and dissemination of home and community-based interventions for informal caregivers of people living with dementia: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Zhu, Eden Meng
    Buljac-Samardzic, Martina
    Ahaus, Kees
    Sevdalis, Nick
    Huijsman, Robbert
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [10] Implementation and dissemination of home- and community-based interventions for informal caregivers of people living with dementia: a systematic scoping review
    Zhu, Eden Meng
    Buljac-Samardzic, Martina
    Ahaus, Kees
    Sevdalis, Nick
    Huijsman, Robbert
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2023, 18 (01)