Comparing and combining biomarkers as principle surrogates for time-to-event clinical endpoints

被引:17
|
作者
Gabriel, Erin E. [1 ]
Sachs, Michael C. [2 ]
Gilbert, Peter B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Vaccine & Infect Dis Div, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] NCI, Biometr Res Branch, Washington, DC USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
causal inference; surrogate endpoint evaluation; survival analysis; accuracy measures; multivariate principal stratification; MARKERS;
D O I
10.1002/sim.6349
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Principal surrogate endpoints are useful as targets for phase I and II trials. In many recent trials, multiple post-randomization biomarkers are measured. However, few statistical methods exist for comparison of or combination of biomarkers as principal surrogates, and none of these methods to our knowledge utilize time-to-event clinical endpoint information. We propose a Weibull model extension of the semi-parametric estimated maximum likelihood method that allows for the inclusion of multiple biomarkers in the same risk model as multivariate candidate principal surrogates. We propose several methods for comparing candidate principal surrogates and evaluating multivariate principal surrogates. These include the time-dependent and surrogate-dependent true and false positive fraction, the time-dependent and the integrated standardized total gain, and the cumulative distribution function of the risk difference. We illustrate the operating characteristics of our proposed methods in simulations and outline how these statistics can be used to evaluate and compare candidate principal surrogates. We use these methods to investigate candidate surrogates in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 395
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dynamic path analysis for exploring treatment effect mediation processes in clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints
    Kormaksson, Matthias
    Lange, Markus Reiner
    Demanse, David
    Strohmaier, Susanne
    Duan, Jiawei
    Xie, Qing
    Carbini, Mariana
    Bossen, Claudia
    Guettner, Achim
    Maniero, Antonella
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [42] Time-to-event endpoints in operable non-small-cell lung cancer randomized clinical trials
    Fiteni, Frederic
    Paillard, Marie-Justine
    Westeel, Virginie
    Bonnetain, Franck
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2017, 17 (02) : 167 - 173
  • [43] Efficient analysis of time-to-event endpoints when the event involves a continuous variable crossing a threshold
    Lin, Chien-Ju
    Wason, James M. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2020, 208 : 119 - 129
  • [44] Methods for Using Aggregate Historical Control Data in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Trials With Time-to-Event Endpoints
    Holzhauer, Bjorn
    [J]. STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 12 (01): : 107 - 116
  • [45] Kernel hazard estimation for visualisation of the effect of a continuous covariates on time-to-event endpoints
    Jackson, Richard J.
    Cox, Trevor F.
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2022, 21 (03) : 514 - 524
  • [46] Comparison of Time-to-Event Data for Clinical Trials
    Nadarajah, Saralees
    [J]. MONTE CARLO METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, 13 (01): : 21 - 35
  • [47] Comparative assessment of trial-level surrogacy measures for candidate time-to-event surrogate endpoints in clinical trials
    Shi, Qian
    Renfro, Lindsay A.
    Bot, Brian M.
    Burzykowski, Tomasz
    Buyse, Marc
    Sargent, Daniel J.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2011, 55 (09) : 2748 - 2757
  • [48] An evaluation of statistical methods for predicting timelines for reaching target number of events in clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints
    Clark, Emma
    Helms, Hans-Joachim
    Stanzel, Sven
    Xia, Fan
    [J]. TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [49] A robust method for comparing two treatments in a confirmatory clinical trial via multivariate time-to-event methods that jointly incorporate information from longitudinal and time-to-event data
    Saville, Benjamin R.
    Herring, Amy H.
    Koch, Gary G.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (01) : 75 - 85
  • [50] Comparing statistical methods in assessing the prognostic effect of biomarker variability on time-to-event clinical outcomes
    Feng Gao
    Jingqin Luo
    Jingxia Liu
    Fei Wan
    Guoqiao Wang
    Mae Gordon
    Chengjie Xiong
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22