The added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of indeterminate small solid renal masses and risk stratification of cystic renal lesions

被引:17
|
作者
Elbanna, Khaled Y. [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Hyun-Jung [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Tae Kyoung [1 ,2 ]
Khalili, Korosh [1 ,2 ]
Guimaraes, Luis S. [1 ,2 ]
Atri, Mostafa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Joint Dept Med Imaging, Univ Hlth Network, Sinai Hlth Syst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Womens Coll Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Imaging, Toronto Gen Hosp, 585 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
关键词
Carcinoma; renal cell; Ultrasonography; Contrast media; Tomography; X-ray computed; Magnetic resonance imaging; BOSNIAK CLASSIFICATION; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT; CT; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; US;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-021-07964-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to characterize indeterminate small solid renal masses (sSRMs), excluding lipid-rich AMLs, and cystic renal masses (CRMs) according to the proposed Bosniak Classification 2019 Materials and methods CEUS of pathology-proven CRMs and sSRMs (without definite enhancement or macroscopic fat on CT/MRI), and CRMs with >= 18 months follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists blindly categorized CRMs according to new Bosniak Classification on CT/MRI. On CEUS, two other radiologists evaluated arterial-phase enhancement of sSRMs relative to renal cortex and categorized CRMs following new Bosniak Classification. Fisher's exact/chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables, and Cohen kappa statistics for inter-observer agreement Results A total of 237 patients had 241 lesions: 161 pathology-proven sSRMs (122 malignant and 39 benign), 29 pathology-proven CRMs, 51 CRMs with adequate follow-up. Arterial-phase enhancement < renal cortex predicted malignancy with specificity of 97.4% (38/39) (CI 85.6-99.9%), and positive predictive value (PPV) of 98.2% (54/55) (CI 90.4-99.9%). Inter-observer kappa was 0.95. In pathology-proven CRMS, sensitivity of CEUS vs CT/MRI was 100% (15/15) (CI 79.6-100%) vs 60% (9/15) (CI 35.8-80.1%) (p value = .002) and negative predictive value (NPV) 100% (2/2) (CI 17.8-100%) vs 25% (2/8 ) (CI 4.4-59.1%) (p value < 0.0001), with similar specificity (50%) and PPV- 88.2% (15/17) (CI 65.7-97.9%) vs 81.8% (9/11) (CI 52.3-96.8%) ( p value = 0.586). Bosniak Classification inter-observer kappa was 0.92 for CEUS vs 0.68 for CT/MRI (p value = 0.009). Conclusion In our cohort, CEUS had high specificity and PPV to diagnose RCC in sSRMs excluding lipid-rich AML. CEUS had significantly higher sensitivity/NPV to diagnose malignancy in CRMs as compared to CT/MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:8468 / 8477
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Evaluation of Cystic Renal Mass
    Das, Chandan J.
    Agarwal, Keshav
    Sharma, Sanjay
    Seth, Amlesh
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (12) : 2873 - 2881
  • [33] Diagnostic evaluation of small renal masses: Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison to multidetector helical computed tomography
    Frauscher, F
    Klauser, A
    Pallwein, L
    Gradl, J
    Pinggera, GM
    Mitterberger, M
    Peschel, R
    Bartsch, G
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 551 - 551
  • [34] Evaluation of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound for investigation of complex cystic Renal masses
    Shahzad, K.
    Simms, M. S.
    Byass, O.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 : 31 - 31
  • [35] Evaluation of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound for investigation of complex cystic renal masses
    Shahzad, K.
    Simms, M. S.
    Byass, O.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2011, 4 (06) : 253 - 258
  • [36] Application of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Bosniak Classification to the Diagnosis of Cystic Renal Masses
    Huang, Mei-Feng
    Zhang, Zhi
    Xia, Qing-Qing
    Zhou, Xi-Ling
    Yuan, Xin-Chun
    Zhou, Zhi-Yu
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 18 (14) : 1470 - 1478
  • [37] Indeterminate cystic renal masses: Evaluation with contrast-enhanced power Doppler US and comparision with CT and MRI findings
    Kim, SH
    Hwang, S
    Kim, A
    Sim, JS
    Lee, HJ
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 580 - 580
  • [38] Small renal masses: Value of contrast-enhanced color Doppler imaging
    Klauser, A
    Frauscher, F
    Hoeltl, L
    Janetschek, G
    Bartsch, G
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 360 - 360
  • [39] Small renal masses: the value of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler imaging
    Pallwein, Leo
    Mitterberger, Michael
    Aigner, Friedrick
    Pinggera, Germar M.
    Gradl, Johann
    Klauser, Andrea
    Halpern, Ethan J.
    Strasser, Hannes
    Bartsch, Georg
    Frauscher, Ferdinand
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 99 (03) : 579 - 585
  • [40] Small renal masses: Value of contrast-enhanced color Doppler imaging
    Frauscher, F
    Klauser, A
    Hoeltl, L
    Pallwein, L
    Halpern, EJ
    Zur Nedden, D
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 441 - 441