The added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of indeterminate small solid renal masses and risk stratification of cystic renal lesions

被引:17
|
作者
Elbanna, Khaled Y. [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Hyun-Jung [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Tae Kyoung [1 ,2 ]
Khalili, Korosh [1 ,2 ]
Guimaraes, Luis S. [1 ,2 ]
Atri, Mostafa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Joint Dept Med Imaging, Univ Hlth Network, Sinai Hlth Syst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Womens Coll Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Imaging, Toronto Gen Hosp, 585 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
关键词
Carcinoma; renal cell; Ultrasonography; Contrast media; Tomography; X-ray computed; Magnetic resonance imaging; BOSNIAK CLASSIFICATION; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT; CT; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; US;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-021-07964-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to characterize indeterminate small solid renal masses (sSRMs), excluding lipid-rich AMLs, and cystic renal masses (CRMs) according to the proposed Bosniak Classification 2019 Materials and methods CEUS of pathology-proven CRMs and sSRMs (without definite enhancement or macroscopic fat on CT/MRI), and CRMs with >= 18 months follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists blindly categorized CRMs according to new Bosniak Classification on CT/MRI. On CEUS, two other radiologists evaluated arterial-phase enhancement of sSRMs relative to renal cortex and categorized CRMs following new Bosniak Classification. Fisher's exact/chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables, and Cohen kappa statistics for inter-observer agreement Results A total of 237 patients had 241 lesions: 161 pathology-proven sSRMs (122 malignant and 39 benign), 29 pathology-proven CRMs, 51 CRMs with adequate follow-up. Arterial-phase enhancement < renal cortex predicted malignancy with specificity of 97.4% (38/39) (CI 85.6-99.9%), and positive predictive value (PPV) of 98.2% (54/55) (CI 90.4-99.9%). Inter-observer kappa was 0.95. In pathology-proven CRMS, sensitivity of CEUS vs CT/MRI was 100% (15/15) (CI 79.6-100%) vs 60% (9/15) (CI 35.8-80.1%) (p value = .002) and negative predictive value (NPV) 100% (2/2) (CI 17.8-100%) vs 25% (2/8 ) (CI 4.4-59.1%) (p value < 0.0001), with similar specificity (50%) and PPV- 88.2% (15/17) (CI 65.7-97.9%) vs 81.8% (9/11) (CI 52.3-96.8%) ( p value = 0.586). Bosniak Classification inter-observer kappa was 0.92 for CEUS vs 0.68 for CT/MRI (p value = 0.009). Conclusion In our cohort, CEUS had high specificity and PPV to diagnose RCC in sSRMs excluding lipid-rich AML. CEUS had significantly higher sensitivity/NPV to diagnose malignancy in CRMs as compared to CT/MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:8468 / 8477
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of indeterminate small solid renal masses and risk stratification of cystic renal lesions
    Khaled Y. Elbanna
    Hyun-Jung Jang
    Tae Kyoung Kim
    Korosh Khalili
    Luís S. Guimarães
    Mostafa Atri
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 8468 - 8477
  • [2] Value contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnostic evaluation of complex cystic renal lesions
    Pallwein, Leo
    Mitterberger, Michael
    Gradl, Johannes
    Aigner, Friedrich
    Strasser, Hannes
    Peschel, Reinhard
    Bartsch, Georg
    Pinggera, Germar M.
    Frauscher, Ferdinand
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 415 - 415
  • [3] Evaluation of Cystic and Solid Renal Lesions with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Retrospective Study
    Najafi, Arash
    Wildt, Michael
    Hainc, Nicolin
    Hohmann, Joachim
    ULTRASOUND INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 07 (01) : E25 - E34
  • [4] COMPLEMENTARY VALUE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND (CEUS) AFTER CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CECT) IN EVALUATION OF INDETERMINATE SMALL HYPOVASCULAR RENAL MASSES
    Rocca, Giovanni Christian
    Tilli, Massimo
    Bernabei, Massimiliano
    Dall'ara, Sergio
    Ballista, Chiara
    Stela, Gamanji
    Benea, Giorgio
    Simone, Maurizio
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (06) : 3699 - 3699
  • [5] CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND FOR SMALL RENAL MASSES
    Oh, Tae Hoon
    Ahn, Seong Hoon
    Kwon, Whi An
    Lee, Jea Whan
    Han, Dong Youp
    Park, Seung Chul
    Jeong, Hee Jong
    Seo, Ill Young
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E109 - E110
  • [6] Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of indeterminate renal cysts on CT
    Cazals, X.
    Bleuzen, A.
    Tranquart, F.
    Aljishi, A.
    Bruyere, F.
    d'Arcier, B. Faivre
    Patat, F.
    Brunereau, L.
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2011, 92 (12): : 1081 - 1090
  • [7] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of cystic and solid renal lesions: a review
    Gulati, Mittul
    King, Kevin G.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Pham, Vivian
    Grant, Edward
    Duddalwar, Vinay A.
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (06): : 1982 - 1996
  • [8] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of cystic and solid renal lesions: a review
    Mittul Gulati
    Kevin G. King
    Inderbir S. Gill
    Vivian Pham
    Edward Grant
    Vinay A. Duddalwar
    Abdominal Imaging, 2015, 40 : 1982 - 1996
  • [9] Evaluation of Renal Masses with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
    Houtzager, S.
    Wijkstra, H.
    de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H.
    Laguna, M. P.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 14 (02) : 116 - 123
  • [10] Evaluation of Renal Masses with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
    S. Houtzager
    H. Wijkstra
    J. J. M. C. H. de la Rosette
    M. P. Laguna
    Current Urology Reports, 2013, 14 : 116 - 123