An integrated assessment of the municipal buildings' use including sustainability criteria

被引:28
|
作者
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [1 ]
Turskis, Zenonas [1 ]
Sliogeriene, Jurate [2 ]
Vilutiene, Tatjana [2 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Inst Sustainable Construct, Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Construct Management & Real Estate, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Sustainability and resiliency of cities; Municipal buildings; Social benefit; Multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); CoCoSo-F method; FDERT method;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2021.102708
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The harmonious and sustainable development of modern societies is inseparable from the efficient use of resources to meet the population's needs. Optimising governance through sound resource management and protecting the needs of society is particularly important and challenging in terms of sustainable development. Stakeholders, therefore, need a new public building management model based on sustainability criteria. The proposed model helps to assess buildings' end-use efficiency making an emphasis on sustainability and including criteria of social benefit. Decision-makers can assess the end-use efficiency of municipal buildings and make equitable solutions using this model. Public sector organisations, especially local governments, need these results to manage large amounts of public assets. The hybrid solution model proposed for decision-making integrates four different methods and several fuzzy criteria values. Policymakers determine the weights of the criteria based on the Delphi method. In the next phase, decision-makers solve the problem with a new fuzzy extended approach to multi-criteria issues and a fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo-F). This model helps decisionmakers meet a wide range of challenges without the precise knowledge that describes the options, as well as the expertise and technical solutions needed to make decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Criteria Methodology for Integrated Health and Sustainability Assessment
    Green, Jackson
    Stevenson, Anna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2015, 2 (02) : S6 - S6
  • [2] MULTI-CRITERIA ASSESSMENT OF AGRICULTURAL BUILDINGS SUSTAINABILITY BEHAVIOR
    Drejeris, Rolandas
    [J]. MANAGEMENT THEORY AND STUDIES FOR RURAL BUSINESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 36 (02): : 264 - 274
  • [3] Including culture in sustainability: an assessment of Canada's Integrated Community Sustainability Plans
    Duxbury, Nancy
    Jeannotte, M. Sharon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 4 (01): : 1 - 19
  • [4] Sustainability Assessment of Buildings
    Bastert, Heinrich
    [J]. MAUERWERK, 2011, 15 (01) : 8 - 12
  • [5] Investigation of the Sustainability and Resilience Characteristics of Buildings Including Existing and Potential Assessment Metrics
    Hasik, V.
    Chhabra, J. P. S.
    Warn, G. P.
    Bilec, M. M.
    [J]. AEI 2017: RESILIENCE OF THE INTEGRATED BUILDING, 2017, : 1019 - 1033
  • [6] Assessment of environmental sustainability with entropy-based indicators for integrated buildings
    Sogut, M. Ziya
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2023, 29 (1-2) : 89 - 107
  • [7] Including sustainability criteria into inventory models
    Bouchery, Yann
    Ghaffari, Asma
    Jemai, Zied
    Dallery, Yves
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 222 (02) : 229 - 240
  • [8] Assessment and Certification of the Sustainability of Buildings
    Graubner, Carl-Alexander
    Lutzkendorf, Thomas
    [J]. MAUERWERK, 2008, 12 (02) : 53 - 60
  • [9] Sustainability Assessment of Buildings Indicators
    Rodrigues, Leonardo
    Delgado, Joao M. P. Q.
    Mendes, Adelio
    Lima, Antonio G. B.
    Guimaraes, Ana S.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [10] An integrated approach to assessing the sustainability of buildings
    Hassan, Osama A. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 14 (04) : 835 - 850