Incentive Mechanism Design for Crowdsourcing: An All-Pay Auction Approach

被引:56
|
作者
Luo, Tie [1 ]
Das, Sajal K. [2 ]
Tan, Hwee Pink [3 ]
Xia, Lirong [4 ]
机构
[1] ASTAR, Inst Infocomm Res, Singapore 138632, Singapore
[2] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
[3] Singapore Management Univ, Singapore 178902, Singapore
[4] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Troy, NY 12180 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Mobile crowd sensing; participatory sensing; incomplete information; risk aversion; Bayesian Nash equilibrium; shading effect; ALLOCATION; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1145/2837029
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Crowdsourcing can be modeled as a principal-agent problem in which the principal (crowdsourcer) desires to solicit a maximal contribution from a group of agents (participants) while agents are only motivated to act according to their own respective advantages. To reconcile this tension, we propose an all-pay auction approach to incentivize agents to act in the principal's interest, i.e., maximizing profit, while allowing agents to reap strictly positive utility. Our rationale for advocating all-pay auctions is based on two merits that we identify, namely all-pay auctions (i) compress the common, two-stage "bid-contribute" crowdsourcing process into a single "bid-cum-contribute" stage, and (ii) eliminate the risk of task nonfulfillment. In our proposed approach, we enhance all-pay auctions with two additional features: an adaptive prize and a general crowdsourcing environment. The prize or reward adapts itself as per a function of the unknown winning agent's contribution, and the environment or setting generally accommodates incomplete and asymmetric information, risk-averse (and risk-neutral) agents, and a stochastic (and deterministic) population. We analytically derive this all-pay auction-based mechanism and extensively evaluate it in comparison to classic and optimized mechanisms. The results demonstrate that our proposed approach remarkably outperforms its counterparts in terms of the principal's profit, agent's utility, and social welfare.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] All-pay war
    Hodler, Roland
    Yektas, Hadi
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2012, 74 (02) : 526 - 540
  • [42] Disclosure policy in a multi-prize all-pay auction with stochastic abilities
    Fu, Qiang
    Jiao, Qian
    Lu, Jingfeng
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2014, 125 (03) : 376 - 380
  • [43] Auctioning risk: the all-pay auction under mean-variance preferences
    Bettina Klose
    Paul Schweinzer
    Economic Theory, 2022, 73 : 881 - 916
  • [44] All-pay matching contests
    Sela, Aner
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GAME THEORY, 2023, 52 (02) : 587 - 606
  • [45] Going once, going twice, sold! The committee assignment process as an all-pay auction
    Lee, Daniel J.
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 2008, 135 (3-4) : 237 - 255
  • [46] Going once, going twice, sold! The committee assignment process as an all-pay auction
    Daniel J. Lee
    Public Choice, 2008, 135 : 237 - 255
  • [47] On equilibrium bidding strategy of the bidders with different attitudes toward risk in all-pay auction
    Wang, PP
    Sun, SR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (12TH), VOLS 1- 3, 2005, : 531 - 534
  • [48] Why do dictators like white elephants? An application of the all-pay auction.
    Magnani, Marco
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2013, 33 (03): : 2260 - 2269
  • [49] Incentive Mechanism and Protocol Design for Crowdsourcing Systems
    Xie, Hong
    Lui, John C. S.
    Jiang, Joe Wenjie
    Chen, Wei
    2014 52ND ANNUAL ALLERTON CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION, CONTROL, AND COMPUTING (ALLERTON), 2014, : 140 - 147
  • [50] All-pay auctions with ties
    Gelder, Alan
    Kovenock, Dan
    Roberson, Brian
    ECONOMIC THEORY, 2022, 74 (04) : 1183 - 1231