An operational, diagnostic surface energy budget model

被引:0
|
作者
Crawford, TM [1 ]
Bluestein, HB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Meteorol, Norman, OK 73019 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY | 2000年 / 39卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<1196:AODSEB>2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In recent years, there has been a growing appreciation of the importance of land-atmosphere interactions in determining the state of the boundary layer To examine this phenomenon in more detail, a new technique has been developed to evaluate the surface energy budget during the daytime from standard meteorological observations. Using only Oklahoma Mesonetwork (Mesonet) data at 5- and 30-min intervals as input, the technique calculates net radiation (R-n), ground heat flux (G), and latent heat Bur (LE). The sensible heat flux (H) is calculated as a residual. The R-n term is calculated using observed values of downwelling shortwave radiation, an improved method of estimating downwelling longwave radiation, and simple parameterizations of upwelling shortwave and longwave radiation. The modeled values of R-n are unbiased and are consistently within 25 W m(-2) of observed values. Ground heat flux, which is the combination of a 5-cm soil flux term and a storage term, was difficult to verify without prior knowledge of vegetation height. Latent heat Bur is calculated from the Penman-Monteith equation, in which surface resistance is estimated. Using data from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program, simple parameterizations were developed (one each for eastern and western Oklahoma) for this term, based on observations of temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, soil moisture, and estimates of leaf age. Net radiation and G are calculated, and then their sum is partitioned into H and LE. Because there were no observations of LE at the Mesonet sites, the preexisting reliable estimates of H were used to verify the new estimates of both H and LE. Because there were problems with the soil moisture data from some of the sites, data from only two Mesonet sites were available for verification. The estimates of H were unbiased and within 60 W m(-2) (rmse) at the sites in both eastern and western Oklahoma. Because of the limited verification data currently available, the model results are preliminary and in need of further testing.
引用
收藏
页码:1196 / 1217
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On the Kinetic Energy Budget of the Unstable Atmospheric Surface Layer
    K. G. Mcnaughton
    Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2006, 118 : 83 - 107
  • [42] The Influence of Changes in Vegetation Type on the Surface Energy Budget
    Runhua Yang
    J. Shukla
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 1994, (02) : 139 - 161
  • [43] The Surface Energy Budget of a Wheat Crop: Estimates of Storage
    J. R. Garratt
    Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2023, 189 : 235 - 250
  • [44] Characterizing heatwaves based on land surface energy budget
    Tian, Yinglin
    Kleidon, Axel
    Lesk, Corey
    Zhou, Sha
    Luo, Xiangzhong
    Ghausi, Sarosh Alam
    Wang, Guangqian
    Zhong, Deyu
    Zscheischler, Jakob
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 5 (01):
  • [45] Role of tropical clouds in surface and atmospheric energy budget
    Tian, Baijun
    Ramanathan, V.
    Journal of Climate, 2002, 15 (01) : 296 - 305
  • [46] Estimating the effect of clouds on the arctic surface energy budget
    Beesley, JA
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D8) : 10103 - 10117
  • [47] Analysis of the surface energy budget during supercooling in rivers
    Boyd, Sean
    Ghobrial, Tadros
    Loewen, Mark
    COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 205
  • [48] On the kinetic energy budget of the unstable atmospheric surface layer
    McNaughton, KG
    BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2006, 118 (01) : 83 - 107
  • [49] WINTER SURFACE-ENERGY BUDGET IN DENVER, COLORADO
    RUFFIEUX, D
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 29 (13) : 1579 - 1587
  • [50] Role of tropical clouds in surface and atmospheric energy budget
    Tian, BJ
    Ramanathan, V
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2002, 15 (03) : 296 - 305