Inclusive versus exclusive: A cross-national comparison of the effects of subnational, national, and supranational identity

被引:38
|
作者
Curtis, K. Amber [1 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
关键词
Common Ingroup Identity Model; European identity; European Union; immigration attitudes; superordinate identification; COMMON INGROUP IDENTITY; SOCIAL IDENTITY; EUROPEAN INTEGRATION; PUBLIC-OPINION; INTERGROUP CONTACT; ANTI-IMMIGRANT; CUTTING CLEAVAGES; ATTITUDES; SUBGROUP; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1177/1465116514528058
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
A superordinate identity reduces bias and facilitates intergroup cooperation. This suggests that getting European Union (EU) citizens to identify with Europe will decrease outgroup hostility. Is European identity thus a superordinate identity? Using Eurobarometer data, I determine which level of identification is the most inclusive for individuals' immigration attitudes. Those who feel European hold more favorable views toward immigrantsan effect that is amplified under conditions of cross-cutting cleavages and where country length of European Union membership is greatest. In contrast, strong national identity is associated with more negative immigration attitudes; regional identity has no effect. A subsequent test confirms that the benefits of identifying with Europe extend most strongly to immigrants of European Union origin, although positive effects are observed toward non-European Union migrants as well.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 546
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条