One-year stability of preseason Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5 (SCAT5) values in university level collision and combative sport athletes

Objectives To determine the stability of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) 5 between consecutive seasons in uninjured collision and combative varsity athletes. Methods Thirty-six athletes (19 females) were recruited to participate (wrestling [n = 12], rugby [n = 14], and hockey [n = 10]). The SCAT5 was administration at the start of the 2017 and 2018 seasons. Median baseline demographics for 2017 were as follows: age (19 years [range: 17-24 years]), height (174 cm [range: 149-195 cm]), and weight (76 kg [range: 57-118 kg]). Outcome metrics included subcomponents of the SCAT5: symptom reporting, standardized assessment of concussion (SAC), neurological screening, and balance performance measured with the modified balance error scoring system (mBESS). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Cronbach's alpha (alpha) values were calculated to determine the stability between consecutive years for the SCAT5 variables in the same cohort of athletes. Bonferroni corrections were applied for Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, where alpha = 0.006 (0.05/9). Results Between the 2017 and 2018 seasons, no differences were noted in symptom reporting (p = 0.14), SAC (p = 0.32), neurological screening (p = 0.98), and balance performance on the mBESS (p = 0.01). The Cronbach's alpha displayed unacceptable to questionable levels of within-subject stability (range: alpha = 0.34-0.70) for all subcomponents, except months in reverse order (alpha = 0.92). Conclusions While no statistical differences were present for all SCAT5 subcomponent metrics between 2017 and 2018 baselines, all but one displayed unacceptable to questionable stability (alpha <= 0.70) when retested one year later. Further research is needed to understand the appropriate time duration baseline SCAT5 values can reliably be utilized within longitudinal studies; as well as the normal variation of SCAT5 reporting/scoring.