Physical modeling of flue instruments: A review of lumped models

被引:0
|
作者
Fabre, B
Hirschberg, A
机构
[1] Univ Paris 06, Lab Acoust Musicale, F-75252 Paris 05, France
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Fluid Dynam Lab, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
来源
ACUSTICA | 2000年 / 86卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Physical modeling of flue instruments is a challenge that has been stimulated by interesting sound synthesis obtained by simple lumped models. Those models are based on a strange mixture of ad-hoc assumptions, theories and fit of experimental results. On the other hand, more formal integral models have also been proposed. They rely on drastic simplifications and are limited to a linear behavior such as expected during the initial phase of a slow attack transient. The sophisticated mathematics involved and the modest results of the more formal models have formed a barrier between the two approaches. Initially, lumped models were simplified to the point that they became numerical oscillators with control parameters having no relationship with the physics. While researchers are now trying to use more realistic lumped models, it would be a goal to use the formal integral models to provide a more solid theoretical basis to lumped models. The issue of such an approach is however still uncertain.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 610
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lumped element models of sound conduction in the human ear: A systematic review
    Wils, Irina
    Geerardyn, Alexander
    Putzeys, Tristan
    Denis, Kathleen
    Verhaert, Nicolas
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2023, 154 (03): : 1696 - 1709
  • [22] Modeling miniaturized piezoelectric ultrasound transducers: comparison of lumped and finite element models
    Ziarati, Pouriya Torkinejad
    Kullukcu, Berkay
    Beker, Levent
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2020,
  • [23] Modeling gain dynamics in EDFAs:: Space-resolved versus lumped models
    Karásek, M
    Menif, M
    Rusch, LA
    FIBER AND INTEGRATED OPTICS, 2001, 20 (06) : 601 - 615
  • [24] Lumped-parameter thermal modeling of an IPEM using thermal component models
    Ortiz-Rodríguez, JM
    Hefner, AR
    Berning, D
    Vélez-Reyes, M
    Hernández-Mora, M
    González, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 IEEE WORKSHOP ON COMPUTERS IN POWER ELECTRONICS, 2004, : 43 - 48
  • [25] Models as instruments for optimizing hospital processes: a systematic review
    van Sambeek, J. R. C.
    Cornelissen, F. A.
    Bakker, P. J. M.
    Krabbendam, J. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2010, 23 (04) : 356 - +
  • [26] FINITE ELEMENT SPINE MODELS AND SPINAL INSTRUMENTS: A REVIEW
    Akinci, Saliha Zeyneb
    Arslan, Yunus Ziya
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (04)
  • [27] Theoretical review of emotional intelligence: models and measuring instruments
    Mejia Diaz, Jhony Jalier
    REVISTA CIENTIFICA, 2013, (17): : 10 - 32
  • [28] Mathematical Models in Physical Modeling.
    Zhizhikov, Yu.M.
    Izvestia Akademii nauk SSSR. Metally, 1981, (01): : 109 - 114
  • [29] Scale-up of affinity membrane modules: comparison between lumped and physical models
    Dimartino, Simone
    Boi, Cristiana
    Sarti, Giulio C.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR RECOGNITION, 2015, 28 (03) : 180 - 190
  • [30] Academic Performance Measuring Instruments in Physical Education: A Systematic Review
    Zhang, Fan
    Erwin, Heather E.
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2023, 94 : A12 - A13